» Texas Landowners Sue Oil Companies for Water Contamination During Hydraulic Fracking

Texas Landowners Sue Oil Companies for Water Contamination During Hydraulic Fracking

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) January 21, 2011 - Gregory D. Jordan, an experienced Austin oil and gas attorney, Austin business lawyer and business litigation lawyer offers commentary on recent suits.

Austin Business Litigation Lawyer and Employment Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin Business Litigation Lawyer and Employment Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Two recently filed lawsuits in Texas argue that hydraulic fracturing in the Barnett Shale has caused significant groundwater contamination. One suit has been filed pertaining to property in Tarrant County and a similar suit has been filed covering property in Denton County. The Tarrant County suit names Chesapeake Energy and Encana Oil & Gas as Defendants. Devon Energy is named as a Defendant in the Denton County suit. Both the Denton County lawsuit and the Tarrant County lawsuit are pending before U.S. District Judge Sam Lindsay in Dallas.

The Barnett Shale field is a massive natural gas producer, but because the shale is an almost impermeable formation, essentially all of the wells in the field must undergo a process of hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” in order to produce gas. Fracking is the process in which millions of gallons of water are mixed with chemicals and other materials and are injected under extremely high pressure into the wellbore. This fractures the rock and allows channels to develop through which the gas can migrate to the wellbore.

In each of these recently filed suits, the Plaintiffs have alleged that the fracking of gas wells contaminated the groundwater that supplied water wells to the landowners. Austin oil and gas attorney, Gregory D. Jordan notes “if these allegations are true, then the oil companies may be liable for the pollution they have caused. The companies should be able to conduct their operations in such a manner that they do not contaminate groundwater supplies.”

Texas oil and gas attorney Jordan continues, “Oil and gas companies have an obligation to avoid polluting groundwater supplies. While the Barnett Shale formation is an extremely important producer of natural gas, development must be done responsibly.”

These two fracking lawsuits are particularly interesting because they follow closely behind allegations from the United States Environmental Protection Agency that water wells in Parker County, Texas were contaminated as a result of natural gas drilling done by Range Resources.

To learn more, contact Austin employment lawyer and Austin business attorney, Gregory D. Jordan or visit http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com.

Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684

Other Practice Areas offered by the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan

  • Restaurant Law
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Hospital Retaliation
  • Overtime and Wage Claims
  • Personal Injury
  • [mappress mapid="39"]

    • Texas appeals court rules on consent provision in oil lease case
      A Texas appeals court eliminated a $27.7 million judgment against an oil and gas company in a dispute over a drilling farmout agreement, ruling that the contract permitted the company to withhold consent to an assignment of the agreement. Carrizo Oil & Gas Inc. had appealed a jury verdict finding it liable for fraud, breach [...]
    • Texas telecommunications company sues Comcast claiming tortious interference
      A small Texas telecommunications company has filed a lawsuit against cable giant Comcast, alleging tortious interference with contract. In the lawsuit, Anthony Luna claims Comcast dug up and destroyed cables owned by his company, Telecom Cable. Luna alleges that Comcast workers cut cables and disrupted service to his customers in the Houston area. The complaint [...]
    • Texas appellate court rules against owner of royalty interest in fraudulent inducement lawsuit
      A Texas appellate court held that the owner of a royalty interest could not claim fraudulent inducement with regard to its settlement with a Shell Oil affiliate that operated the oil and gas property. In 2014, a Texas state court jury found that the Syrian American Oil Corp. (Samoco) was fraudulently induced into entering a [...]

    See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , , , ,



    Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

    * indicates required