» Texas Landowners Sue Oil Companies for Water Contamination During Hydraulic Fracking

Texas Landowners Sue Oil Companies for Water Contamination During Hydraulic Fracking

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) January 21, 2011 - Gregory D. Jordan, an experienced Austin oil and gas attorney, Austin business lawyer and business litigation lawyer offers commentary on recent suits.

Austin Business Litigation Lawyer and Employment Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin Business Litigation Lawyer and Employment Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Two recently filed lawsuits in Texas argue that hydraulic fracturing in the Barnett Shale has caused significant groundwater contamination. One suit has been filed pertaining to property in Tarrant County and a similar suit has been filed covering property in Denton County. The Tarrant County suit names Chesapeake Energy and Encana Oil & Gas as Defendants. Devon Energy is named as a Defendant in the Denton County suit. Both the Denton County lawsuit and the Tarrant County lawsuit are pending before U.S. District Judge Sam Lindsay in Dallas.

The Barnett Shale field is a massive natural gas producer, but because the shale is an almost impermeable formation, essentially all of the wells in the field must undergo a process of hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” in order to produce gas. Fracking is the process in which millions of gallons of water are mixed with chemicals and other materials and are injected under extremely high pressure into the wellbore. This fractures the rock and allows channels to develop through which the gas can migrate to the wellbore.

In each of these recently filed suits, the Plaintiffs have alleged that the fracking of gas wells contaminated the groundwater that supplied water wells to the landowners. Austin oil and gas attorney, Gregory D. Jordan notes “if these allegations are true, then the oil companies may be liable for the pollution they have caused. The companies should be able to conduct their operations in such a manner that they do not contaminate groundwater supplies.”

Texas oil and gas attorney Jordan continues, “Oil and gas companies have an obligation to avoid polluting groundwater supplies. While the Barnett Shale formation is an extremely important producer of natural gas, development must be done responsibly.”

These two fracking lawsuits are particularly interesting because they follow closely behind allegations from the United States Environmental Protection Agency that water wells in Parker County, Texas were contaminated as a result of natural gas drilling done by Range Resources.

To learn more, contact Austin employment lawyer and Austin business attorney, Gregory D. Jordan or visit http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com.

Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684

Other Practice Areas offered by the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan

  • Restaurant Law
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Hospital Retaliation
  • Overtime and Wage Claims
  • Personal Injury
    • Eight ex-employees of Texas sanitation company claim racial discrimination
      Eight African American employees of a Texas sanitation company have filed a lawsuit claiming discrimination and retaliation. Dantrell Patterson, Lamonte Young, Demetrius Patterson, Tadarious Dixon, Keithdrick Patterson, Jarvis Hill, Jermaine Bell and Derrick Robert filed the lawsuit against Sanitation Solutions Inc. in the Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas on April 20. The [...]
    • Pipeline owners file $300 million breach of contract lawsuit against midstream operator
      An amended breach of contract lawsuit was filed by Magellan Midstream Partners and Plains All American Pipeline against Stampede Energy, seeking over $300 million in damages over an oil transport deal. The lawsuit claims that Stampede did not meet minimum volume obligations on the BridgeTex pipeline from March 2015 through 2016, breaching its contract. The [...]
    • Texas appeals court’s decision shows importance of wording in noncompete agreements
      A recent decision by a Texas appeals court demonstrates that the wording of a noncompete agreement must be precise. In the case, East Texas Copy Systems, Inc. v. Player, the Court of Appeals in Texarkana ruled that a noncompete agreement was nonbinding due to the language used in the agreement. As part of the sale [...]

    See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , , , ,



    Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

    * indicates required