» Austin Business Litigation Attorney Gregory Jordan comments on Texas Shareholder Dispute over $7 Billion Takeunder Merger

Austin Business Litigation Attorney Gregory Jordan comments on Texas Shareholder Dispute over $7 Billion Takeunder Merger

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) April 26, 2011 - Breach of fiduciary duties and shareholder disputes take center stage in the class action lawsuit between a Frontier Oil Corporation shareholder and Frontier’s Board of Directors as it tries to merge with the Holly Corporation.

Austin Business Litigation Lawyer and Employment Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin Business Litigation Lawyer and Employment Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Frontier Oil Corporation and the Holly Corporation have signed a $7 billion agreement to merge to become one of the biggest U.S. oil refiners. Frontier’s shareholder Walter Ryan, Jr. alleges they would become minority shareholders in the new company and the deal is really a takeunder because Holly is buying Frontier for less than its market price.

The complaint slams the merger, alleging that, “Frontier’s shareholders will be permanently and incurably harmed if the proposed transaction is allowed to be consummated.” The dispute includes allegations of preclusive deal protection devices with a no-shop clause that prohibits Frontier from seeking alternative merger offers, an excessive termination fee of $80 million that Holly Corp. will charge if another offer arises, and selling Frontier at a low, unfair price.

As Ryan and apparently some other Frontier shareholders view the dispute, the directors of Frontier have a fiduciary duty to “obtain the highest value reasonably available for the corporation’s shareholders” as well as not to receive financial benefit or “preferential treatment at the expense of public shareholders.”

This lawsuit in the District Court of Harris County, Texas points to the fact that sometimes directors, partners, and shareholders need legal representation to ensure all parties will act reasonably and as promised.

“Whether it is a dispute over $7 billion or a few hundred thousand, businesses and partnerships do not always operate smoothly,” said Austin business lawyer Gregory D. Jordan. “Counsel must understand business partnerships and shareholder obligations. In a dispute such as this, it is critical to have legal counsel that will effectively and efficiently pursue your best interests. It will be very interesting to see whether the court finds those obligations were breached in this case.”

The Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan has handled numerous disputes involving partnerships and shareholders. As an Austin shareholder attorney and Austin partnership attorney, Jordan has more than 20 years of experience with businesses in oil and gas production and exploration, medicine and dentistry, restaurants, wholesale products distribution, real estate and property development, sales and retail establishments, airplane sales and leasing, intellectual property licensing, franchises, software development and hardware, and a wealth of other business ventures.

To learn more, contact Austin employment attorney and Austin business attorney, Gregory D. Jordan or visit http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com.

Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684

Other Practice Areas offered by the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan

  • Restaurant Law
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Hospital Retaliation
  • Overtime and Wage Claims
  • Personal Injury
    • Eight ex-employees of Texas sanitation company claim racial discrimination
      Eight African American employees of a Texas sanitation company have filed a lawsuit claiming discrimination and retaliation. Dantrell Patterson, Lamonte Young, Demetrius Patterson, Tadarious Dixon, Keithdrick Patterson, Jarvis Hill, Jermaine Bell and Derrick Robert filed the lawsuit against Sanitation Solutions Inc. in the Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas on April 20. The [...]
    • Pipeline owners file $300 million breach of contract lawsuit against midstream operator
      An amended breach of contract lawsuit was filed by Magellan Midstream Partners and Plains All American Pipeline against Stampede Energy, seeking over $300 million in damages over an oil transport deal. The lawsuit claims that Stampede did not meet minimum volume obligations on the BridgeTex pipeline from March 2015 through 2016, breaching its contract. The [...]
    • Texas appeals court’s decision shows importance of wording in noncompete agreements
      A recent decision by a Texas appeals court demonstrates that the wording of a noncompete agreement must be precise. In the case, East Texas Copy Systems, Inc. v. Player, the Court of Appeals in Texarkana ruled that a noncompete agreement was nonbinding due to the language used in the agreement. As part of the sale [...]

    See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,



    Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

    * indicates required