» Contract Breaches and Ignored Non-compete Agreements Cost a Houston Hospital Millions

Contract Breaches and Ignored Non-compete Agreements Cost a Houston Hospital Millions

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) June 15, 2011 - The University General Hospital in Houston and its affiliated companies – Ascension Physician Solutions and Luxxus Health Systems – are under scrutiny after a jury slammed a hefty verdict against them in Houston's 270th State District Court. Prexus Health LLC was awarded $7.86 million in the complex lawsuit.

Austin Business Litigation Lawyer and Employment Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin Business Litigation Lawyer and Employment Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Luxxus was found to have interfered with confidentiality and noncompete agreements by employing past Prexus executives and workers to perform similar jobs at the Houston hospital. University General Hospital was found to have wrongfully terminated and breached contractual agreements with Prexus.

The contractual agreements involved management and administrative services at the hospital. The 72-bed specialty hospital is part of Houston’s massive Texas Medical Center. University General Hospital is no stranger to lawsuits. Over the last couple of years, it has settled disputes involving alleged contract breaches, unpaid equipment leases and rents, and other matters, according to its March 28, 2011 filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

“Businesses must be diligent about meeting their contractual obligations or they potentially face stiff consequences,” said Austin business litigation attorney and Austin non-compete attorney Gregory D. Jordan. “Texas law on non-compete agreements has changed dramatically in the last five years. Expert legal counsel is often advisable when a business faces questions regarding its hiring policies and non-compete agreements or wants to hire workers from inside an industry.”

Non-compete agreements may be critical to businesses seeking to protect their trade secrets, confidential business information, client and vendor lists, as well as sales and marketing strategies. “You see many types of non-compete agreements,” said Jordan, who has extensive experience representing employers and employees in disputes involving these types of agreements. “Some of them are enforceable and some are not. It usually pays to have a knowledgeable attorney review a non-compete agreement as it can have a long-term impact on both the business and the employee.”

The movement of employees between businesses can provide fertile grounds for disputes. Sometimes the disputes are warranted and sometimes they are not. The issue with the University General Hospital in Houston was obviously a dispute where the jury found inappropriate conduct had occurred. To learn more, please contact Austin non-compete attorney, Austin business litigation lawyer and Austin business attorney Gregory D. Jordan at http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com or call (512) 419-0684.

To learn more, contact Austin employment attorney and Austin business attorney, Gregory D. Jordan or visit http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com.
Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684


Other Practice Areas offered by the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan

  • Restaurant Law
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Hospital Retaliation
  • Overtime and Wage Claims
  • Personal Injury
  • [mappress mapid="39"]

    • Texas appellate court rules against owner of royalty interest in fraudulent inducement lawsuit
      A Texas appellate court held that the owner of a royalty interest could not claim fraudulent inducement with regard to its settlement with a Shell Oil affiliate that operated the oil and gas property. In 2014, a Texas state court jury found that the Syrian American Oil Corp. (Samoco) was fraudulently induced into entering a [...]
    • Eight ex-employees of Texas sanitation company claim racial discrimination
      Eight African American employees of a Texas sanitation company have filed a lawsuit claiming discrimination and retaliation. Dantrell Patterson, Lamonte Young, Demetrius Patterson, Tadarious Dixon, Keithdrick Patterson, Jarvis Hill, Jermaine Bell and Derrick Robert filed the lawsuit against Sanitation Solutions Inc. in the Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas on April 20. The [...]
    • Pipeline owners file $300 million breach of contract lawsuit against midstream operator
      An amended breach of contract lawsuit was filed by Magellan Midstream Partners and Plains All American Pipeline against Stampede Energy, seeking over $300 million in damages over an oil transport deal. The lawsuit claims that Stampede did not meet minimum volume obligations on the BridgeTex pipeline from March 2015 through 2016, breaching its contract. The [...]

    See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,



    Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

    * indicates required