» Electronic I-9 Software Vendor Dispute Puts Certain Employers in a Bind

Electronic I-9 Software Vendor Dispute Puts Certain Employers in a Bind

Dallas, TX (Law Firm Newswire) September 20, 2011 – The Department of Homeland Security’s enhanced worksite enforcement efforts and its electronic I-9 regulations have raised several issues since their inception, but a new lawsuit raises questions about employers’ private data.

“Now more than ever, employers considering a software vendor for paperless I-9 and E-Verify processing must perform their due diligence,” said Stewart Rabinowitz, a Dallas immigration attorney with the firm Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz.

LexisNexis Screening Solutions, Inc., a background check company, struck a five year deal with USVerify, Inc. in June 2006, where USVerify would provide electronic I-9 and E-Verify services. LexisNexis customers who contracted for those services received them through USVerify, and LexisNexis agreed to pay USVerify a fee.

In April 2011, LexisNexis sent USVerify a notice stating it would not be renewing its contract when the current one expired in June 2011. LexisNexis also sought to receive its customers’ I-9 data from USVerify after the contract expired. USVerify said that returning the data would be “additional work”, and that LexisNexis would be required to pay a fee to get the information back. USVerify also contacted LexisNexis customers directly to see if they would be interested in receiving its services.

As a result, LexisNexis filed a suit against USVerify to return its clients’ data and to cease and desist from disclosing any confidential information that US Verify still held.

This case raises compliance issues. LexisNexis customers appear not to have direct access to their I-9 data, which means that a LexisNexis customer would have been out of regulatory compliance because DHS I-9 regulations require the electronic storage system where the I-9 data is held to not be a part of an agreement or contract that could limit access to it.

“This litigation points out critical issues as to who owns and has unrestricted access to the data, and what procedures are in place for the employer to obtain backups of its data,” Rabinowitz said. “These and other issues must be satisfactorily addressed to assure that an employer can comply with any ICE Notice of Inspection without running afoul of DHS’ electronic I-9 regulations.”

Employers and companies who seek to outsource I-9 and E-Verify services must ensure their agreements comply with the strict guidelines in place, or risk potential DHS penalties.

Stewart Rabinowitz is President of Dallas-based Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C. Mr. Rabinowitz is Board Certified in Immigration and Nationality Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. To learn more, contact a Dallas immigration lawyer or Dallas immigration attorney at Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C., call 1.972.233.6200 or visit http://www.rabinowitzrabinowitz.com.

Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C.
14901 Quorum Drive, Suite 580
Dallas, Texas 75254
Phone: 972.233.6200

  • CBP to use facial recognition software in biometric exit processing
    Facial recognition biometric exit technology will be deployed at Washington Dulles International Airport., U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced in early June, 2017. The technology will be used daily for one flight to Dubai from the United States, building upon an earlier pilot program at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. Additional airports will be added ...
  • Department of State publishes rule to ask security risk applicants for in-depth information
    The Department of State has published a proposal to increase the amount of information collected from certain visa applicants. The proposal for information collection was published May 4, 2017 in the Federal Register, under emergency review procedures. The Department stated that the information collection would implement a March 6, 2017 memorandum issued by President Trump ...
  • The CRS Issues Report on Sanctuary Cities
    The Congressional Research Service (CRS) has issued a report on sanctuary cities, addressing the issue of how to define a sanctuary city, specific limitations that states and localities have placed on immigration enforcement activity, and measures that the federal government has taken to counteract sanctuary policies. The CRS report comes at a time when the ...

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required