» Right to Counsel Compromised When Aliens are Arrested Without Warrant

Right to Counsel Compromised When Aliens are Arrested Without Warrant

Dallas, TX (Law Firm Newswire) September 22, 2011 – When an alien is arrested without a warrant, immigration officers are not required to advise the person arrested of the right to counsel or the right to remain silent. So holds the Board of Immigration Appeals in Matter of E-R-M-F & A-R-M decided in August 2011. Only after ICE files its Notice to Appear (“NTA”) with the Immigration Court do the customary advisories of the right to remain silent and right to counsel come into play. But an arrest without warrant under this decision leaves statements made in a subsequent interrogation as admissible in removal proceedings until the NTA is filed.

"The BIA decision that permits Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) free rein to question aliens first and advise them later that they did not have to speak is fundamentally unfair,” said Dallas immigration attorney Stewart Rabinowitz, of the law firm of Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C. “This invites ICE to intimidate with impunity. All persons should be advised of the fundamental right to remain silent when faced with police interrogation." The holding flies in the face of fundamental fairness in American jurisprudence – that a person should know before answering that any statements made can be used against him or her and that he or she has a right to counsel before speaking, which is by now a basic concept in our law. “It just does not pass the sniff test,” says Rabinowitz.

Stewart Rabinowitz is President of Dallas-based Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C. Mr. Rabinowitz is Board Certified in Immigration and Nationality Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. To learn more, contact a Dallas immigration lawyer or Dallas immigration attorney at Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C., call 1.972.233.6200 or visit http://www.rabinowitzrabinowitz.com.

Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C.
14901 Quorum Drive, Suite 580
Dallas, Texas 75254
Phone: 972.233.6200

  • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upholds TRO against President Trump’s January 27, 2017 executive order
    On February 9, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously upheld a temporary restraining order (TRO) against President Trump’s January 27 executive order preventing travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S. President Trump’s executive order banned for 90 days entry of individuals from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, ...
  • USCIS sets out new standard for National Interest Waiver petitions
    In a recent decision by the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the AAO set out a new standard to adjudicate National Interest Waiver (NIW) employment based immigrant visa petitions. As background, an employment based immigrant visa petition in the advanced degree or exceptional ability category requires an employer ...
  • Bipartisan bill introduced to protect DACA recipients
    A bipartisan group of senators in this lame duck session of Congress has introduced legislation to protect undocumented young immigrants who were brought to the United States as children – a group whose status may be threatened if President-elect Trump cancels President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Senators Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and ...

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required