Austin Oil and Gas Attorney Emphasizes Importance of Quickly Investigating Royalty Disputes
Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) April 2, 2012 - "A recent Texas Supreme Court oil and gas case shows the importance of quickly looking into suspect royalty payments if an owner feels he or she is being underpaid. In Shell Oil v. Ralph Ross a royalty owner learned the hard way about not taking action on royalty payments within the statute of limitations. The Rosses were owed a one-sixteenth royalty along with the State of Texas as part of a pooling and unitization agreement with Shell. The Court found that even though Shell had underpaid Ross, Ross could not collect the underpaid funds because Ross did not exercise due diligence within the four-year statute of limitations period.
“This ruling shows how important it is for royalty owners to act on concerns about shortchanged royalty payments or missing ones,” said Austin oil and gas attorney Gregory D. Jordan. “If you think you’re seeing something questionable occurring in the accounting when you receive a royalty payment, do something about it. If you cannot get a satisfactory answer to your questions from the oil company, your best bet may be to contact a knowledgeable Texas oil and gas lawyer,” advised Jordan.
In Ross, the Texas Supreme Court noted that public information records showed the state was being adequately paid whereas the Rosses were not. The Court stated that the Rosses could have researched prices in the El Paso Permian Basin Index or the Texas General Land Office. The Court also suggested the Rosses could have asked companies who bought the gas from Shell what they paid or gone to Shell directly to inquire about prices.
The Texas Supreme Court found that Shell paid the Rosses an arbitrary price for the production from the lease wells and a weighted average for the unit wells. All of this did not matter, however, because the Court said the Rosses did not bring their claim within the legal time limit to do so.
“It is easy to become preoccupied with other matters and try to justify why you did not make or investigate a claim of unpaid royalties in a timely manner,” said Jordan. “But don’t shortchange yourself or get convinced by a company rep or land man to not pursue your instincts about not being fully paid. It is better to know than forfeit your rights.”
Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Other Practice Areas offered by the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan:
- Texas Appeals Court rules against lessee in offset well dispute
The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas found that a lessee had failed to prove that it had drilled an offset well as required by oil and gas leases. In the case, Shirley Adams et al. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA, the lessors and royalty owners sued lessee Murphy for breach of [...]
- Texas oil networking company files lawsuit for tortious interference, unfair competition
A lawsuit has been filed by a networking website for oil workers, claiming that a Texas man who founded the company stole data to launch a competing business. Rigzone.com claims to host the resumes of over 2 million workers in the oil and gas industry. Workers post their resumes for free, and recruiters pay a [...]
- Texas jury awards 1.5 million dollars to mineral rights owner
A Harris County, Texas jury awarded $1.5 million to Jack Grynberg and his family, finding that Exxon Mobil did not act in good faith in determining the mineral royalties the company owed him. Grynberg says he is owed even more and is considering appealing the verdict. Grynberg says his royalties compensation could have been nearly [...]
See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: Austin business attorney, Austin business lawyer, Austin business litigation attorney, Austin business litigation lawyer, austin employment attorney, austin employment lawyer