» Contributory Liability Is an Increasingly Outdated Clause

Contributory Liability Is an Increasingly Outdated Clause

Brunswick, GA (Law Firm Newswire) September 5, 2012 - For the past decade in Maryland, plaintiffs have been barred from recovering medical liability damages if they were found to have contributed to their injury.

All of that could change, as Maryland’s high court has agreed to examine that state's contributory liability clause, which states that parties found even partly responsible for being harmed may not collect damages from another culpable party.

The legal dispute prompting the examination started when a Maryland-based assistant soccer coach swung from a goal post, which then fell on him, causing multiple facial injuries. He sued the local soccer association, claiming that representatives failed to properly inspect and secure the goal post and failed to warn him about the potential danger of swinging from it.

In 2011, jurors found in favor of the plaintiff, deciding that the soccer association's negligence caused his injuries. However, they also found that the plaintiff's actions did contribute to his accident. Maryland has a contributory negligence clause, which prevented the plaintiff from receiving any award.

During the plaintiff's appeal, his attorney argued that contributory negligence is an “antiquated doctrine" and should be changed to comparative negligence, which would allow jurors to decide the level of responsibility of each party and then allocate the appropriate amount of liability to each side. The Court of Appeals of Maryland has agreed to review the case, although a date for oral arguments has not yet been scheduled.

"What we tend to see when contributory negligence is applied is unfair verdicts," said Brunswick personal injury attorney Nathan Williams. "Comparative negligence, on the other hand, is a way to match responsibly and fault. For example, the plaintiff could be considered 15 percent at fault, while the soccer association is deemed 85 percent liable. The damage award would be adjusted or reduced, depending on the level of responsibility."

Currently, the contributory negligence clause is used in Alabama, the District of Columbia, Maryland, North Carolina and Virginia, while other states apply comparative negligence. Meanwhile, physicians argue that uprooting the law would allow patients to recover significant damages, even when their own lack of compliance aided their outcome.

Nathan Williams is a Brunswick divorce attorney, Brunswick personal injury lawyer, Brunswick criminal defense attorney and Brunswick DUI lawyer in Southeast Georgia. Visit http://www.thewilliamslitigationgroup.com or call 1.912.264.0848.

The Williams Litigation Group
5 St. Andrews Court
Brunswick, GA 31520
Phone: 912.264.0848
Toll Free: 877.307.4537
Fax: 912-264-6299

View Larger Map

  • $1,500,000 Jury Verdict in a Case Against a Hotel
    My firm, along with attorney Chris Stewart and Eugene Felton, recently received a verdict for $1,500,000 in a case against a hotel in Camden County, Georgia. The case involved a hotel front-desk clerk giving out our client’s room key to an unknown individual who ultimately used the key to enter the client’s room and sexually assault her. During the course of discovery it was discovered that the hotel did not have a written policy requiring individuals to present identification before recoding keys and the hotel employees essentially had no training in this regard. Nathan Williams www.TheWilliamsLitigationGroup.com
  • $330,000 Jury Verdict in Case Against Wal-Mart
    We recently received a $330,000 jury verdict in a case against Wal-Mart. The jury found that Wal-Mart had incorrectly filled our client’s medication with Warfarin, which is a blood thinner. Client had multiple hospital admissions directly caused by his unknowingly taking the wrong medication. Despite Wal-Mart’s repeated denial of the mistake, the jury found otherwise and held them accountable. A good result for a wonderful client. Nathan Williams www.TheWilliamsLitigationGroup.com
  • How Common are Pharmacy Errors?
    Very. You should check every prescription you have filled to confirm that you have the correct medication – this especially true with your children’s medication. Many chain pharmacies (CVS, Walgreens, etc.) actually have a “pill identifier” label on the outside of the bottle. This label describes the shape and color of the pill that is supposed to be in the bottle. Some chain pharmacies (i.e. Wal-Mart) don’t currently provide this label. You should always confirm that both the label on the outside of your bottle is correct as well as the shape, size, and inscription on the pill is correct. […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , ,

Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required