» Florida Killer’s Stay of Execution Upheld by U.S. Supreme Court

Florida Killer’s Stay of Execution Upheld by U.S. Supreme Court

Lakeland, FL (Law Firm Newswire) November 7, 2012 – The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a stay of execution granted by a federal appeals court to John Errol Ferguson, aged 64.

Ferguson is on Florida’s death row for eight killings near Miami in the late 1970s. His lawyers argue that he is mentally ill and should not be executed.

“In cases like this, people might feel like justice is being delayed,” Polk County criminal defense attorney Thomas Grajek said in a statement, “but it is important that every defendant’s rights be protected.”

The stay of execution came just hours before Ferguson was scheduled to be executed by lethal injection. The appeals court scheduled motions that apparently will delay the execution for at least two weeks. Ferguson was first sentenced to death 34 years ago.

Ferguson is convicted of shooting eight people execution-style in a botched robbery attempt at a Carol City, Fla. home in late 1977. It was the the worst mass killing in Miami-Dade County history up to that point. He is also convicted of killing a teenage couple in Hialeah, Fla. in 1978.

Ferguson’s lawyers say he is a paranoid schizophrenic who believes he is the “Prince of God.” He was sentenced to die in both of his murder trials, with defense attorneys unsuccessfully arguing his insanity as a defense in the teens’ murders.

A panel of mental health experts appointed by Gov. Rick Scott convinced a court that Ferguson was mentally competent to face execution. The Florida Supreme Court upheld that ruling, saying that Ferguson understands his situation, and officials then scheduled the execution. However, the latest federal appeals court ruling said that the Florida Supreme Court may have made an “unreasonable determination of the facts” regarding Ferguson’s mental health and delayed the execution.

“Our justice system protects those who do not know the difference between right and wrong,” added Mr. Grajek, “and any questions of a defendant’s sanity must be thoroughly addressed.”

Thomas C. Grajek
206 Easton Drive, Suite 102
Lakeland, FL 33803
Phone: 863.688.4606


View Larger Map

  • Arrest made in Polk County "SWAT"ting incident involving "anonymous" calls to police to lure SWAT team to high school.
    A Canadian juvenile was arrested in the recent Polk County “swatting” case.  “SWATting” is when an individual attempts to lure the SWAT time to respond to a location for a fake threat of some type. Polk County deputies allege the teen anonymously placed hoax calls to law enforcement officials in an effort to lure SWAT teams to respond to Ft. Meade high school over the past four-months.  Deputies say the investigation began in September, when an unidentified male called the sheriff’s office and Fort Meade High School and said he was going to “drive to Fort Meade High School in […]
  • Just in time for Christmas, Polk Sheriff Grady Judd's prostitution sting results in 61 arrests.
    Sheriff Grady Judd will hold a press conference today to announce the results of the latest Polk Prostitution sting from last week.  The sting was part of a  undercover operation targeting individuals who respond to online advertisements on Backpage.com.  The online ads are usually listings for escort or massage services, but once the person responds to the hotel, the undercover deputies try to make an arrest for an illegal activity.  These undercover officers can be very aggressive and often do most of the talking.  The sheriff was also targeting human trafficking which is a much more serious felony offense. There are some harsh […]
  • Medical marijuana amendment fails in Florida, pot still illegal to possess. What defenses do you have to a possession of cannabis case?
    Florida’s medical marijuana amendment did not pass yesterday in the election.  Even though a majority of the voters voted in favor of passing the medical marijuana amendment, receiving 58% of the vote, it fell 2% shy needed to pass.  In 2006, Florida voters decided all constitutional amendments needed a “super majority” to pass (60% instead of 50%). Ironically, that amendment that now requires a super majority, only passed with 57.8% of the vote.  Whether or not the issue is placed back on the ballot is unknown at this time.  John Morgan of Morgan & Morgan who spearheaded the campaign had previously […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required