» Florida Killer’s Stay of Execution Upheld by U.S. Supreme Court

Florida Killer’s Stay of Execution Upheld by U.S. Supreme Court

Lakeland, FL (Law Firm Newswire) November 7, 2012 - The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a stay of execution granted by a federal appeals court to John Errol Ferguson, aged 64.

Ferguson is on Florida's death row for eight killings near Miami in the late 1970s. His lawyers argue that he is mentally ill and should not be executed.

“In cases like this, people might feel like justice is being delayed,” Polk County criminal defense attorney Thomas Grajek said in a statement, “but it is important that every defendant's rights be protected.”

The stay of execution came just hours before Ferguson was scheduled to be executed by lethal injection. The appeals court scheduled motions that apparently will delay the execution for at least two weeks. Ferguson was first sentenced to death 34 years ago.

Ferguson is convicted of shooting eight people execution-style in a botched robbery attempt at a Carol City, Fla. home in late 1977. It was the the worst mass killing in Miami-Dade County history up to that point. He is also convicted of killing a teenage couple in Hialeah, Fla. in 1978.

Ferguson's lawyers say he is a paranoid schizophrenic who believes he is the “Prince of God.” He was sentenced to die in both of his murder trials, with defense attorneys unsuccessfully arguing his insanity as a defense in the teens' murders.

A panel of mental health experts appointed by Gov. Rick Scott convinced a court that Ferguson was mentally competent to face execution. The Florida Supreme Court upheld that ruling, saying that Ferguson understands his situation, and officials then scheduled the execution. However, the latest federal appeals court ruling said that the Florida Supreme Court may have made an “unreasonable determination of the facts” regarding Ferguson's mental health and delayed the execution.

“Our justice system protects those who do not know the difference between right and wrong,” added Mr. Grajek, “and any questions of a defendant's sanity must be thoroughly addressed.”

Thomas C. Grajek
206 Easton Drive, Suite 102
Lakeland, FL 33803
Phone: 863.688.4606


View Larger Map

  • Prostitution and Solicitation for a Lewd Act sting by Pasco Sheriff Nocco results in 28 arrests. Some charged are facing a $5,000.00 “civil penalty” that is currently on appeal with the 2nd District Court of Appeal.
    The Pasco County Sheriff announced the results of a four day Prostitution sting operation today that resulted in 28 arrests.  Pasco Sheriff Chris Nocco stated the females were arrested after advertising on the internet.  This usually means the women posted an ad on “Backpage.com” under “Escort Services” or “Massage”.  The Lewdness/Prostitution statute has different sections depending on whether the individual was the alleged “prostitute” or the alleged “john”.  It is only the “johns”, the person seeking the services of a prostitute that are assessed an additional $5,000.00 “civil penalty” regardless of whether the person is “adjudicated guilty” or the person […]
  • Winter Haven man arrested for DUI after driving wrong way on I-4.
    The Florida Highway Patrol arrested a Winter Haven man in Polk County early this morning for DUI after he was allegedly stopped driving the wrong way on I-4.  FHP has dash cams on most of their patrol cars so part of the traffic stop was captured on video.  It appears the driver was initially spotted by another motorist who called 911 to report the alleged incident.  By the time troopers caught up with the alleged vehicle, it allegedly had turned around and was driving the correct direction, but with no headlights on. A good DUI lawyer will get copy of […]
  • Being Around Marijuana is not a Crime, but Conspiring to Commit a Prohibited Act Is
    If a person is caught smoking Marijuana with someone else, but the stash does not belong to the first person, they will not be charged with a crime. The law says that possession of marijuana is a crime, but being in the same room as the drug is not. While the distinction may seem to be vague, it may make a difference to an accused if they are able to prove they were merely in the presence of marijuana, but the drug was not theirs. It is easier yet if the person who did own the stash admits to owning […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required