» Sobriety Checkpoints Are Not Just About Sobriety

Sobriety Checkpoints Are Not Just About Sobriety

Lakeland, FL (Law Firm Newswire) December 14, 2012 – Sobriety checkpoints exist to check for a wide variety of offenses.

“Sobriety checkpoints are not just about catching drunk drivers. They are also designed to check drivers for drug-impaired driving, not to mention equipment violations, proper registration, proper insurance coverage, and whether they have a valid driver’s license,” said Thomas Grajek, a Polk County criminal defense lawyer.

Consider a recent sobriety checkpoint operation held in a neighboring county, in which County Sheriffs halted at least 200 vehicles, and in the process, arrested and charged one individual for not having a valid driver’s license, possessing a controlled substance he planned to sell and possessing marijuana. “It was apparently a fairly busy operation, with narcotics deputies, K-9 units and regular deputies manning the checkpoint,” Grajek added.

“If you get stopped at a checkpoint such as this, make sure you know your rights,” Grajek cautioned. For instance, those stopped on the suspicion of driving while intoxicated are not obligated to take a field sobriety test, or carry out any other type of test requested by law enforcement. They are also not required to speak to a police officer.

“When it comes right down to it, if someone is charged with DUI/DWI, or thinks they will be, it is best if they say nothing, and insist on calling criminal defense counsel. Do not say anything to the police. Do not volunteer why you may have been driving while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, because your words will come back to haunt you later. Why you were driving under the influence is something to discuss only with your lawyer, and do not let anyone tell you otherwise,” Grajek added.

Ultimately, it would be a good idea not to drink and drive, or drive while under the influence of a drug. However, life happens, and sometimes an unexpected reaction to a drug, or an inadvertent combination of two substances causes a person to drive erratically. This is when the skilled assistance of a criminal defense attorney is mandatory in order to get justice.

Thomas C. Grajek
206 Easton Drive, Suite 102
Lakeland, FL 33803
Phone: 863.688.4606


View Larger Map

  • Arrest made in Polk County "SWAT"ting incident involving "anonymous" calls to police to lure SWAT team to high school.
    A Canadian juvenile was arrested in the recent Polk County “swatting” case.  “SWATting” is when an individual attempts to lure the SWAT time to respond to a location for a fake threat of some type. Polk County deputies allege the teen anonymously placed hoax calls to law enforcement officials in an effort to lure SWAT teams to respond to Ft. Meade high school over the past four-months.  Deputies say the investigation began in September, when an unidentified male called the sheriff’s office and Fort Meade High School and said he was going to “drive to Fort Meade High School in […]
  • Just in time for Christmas, Polk Sheriff Grady Judd's prostitution sting results in 61 arrests.
    Sheriff Grady Judd will hold a press conference today to announce the results of the latest Polk Prostitution sting from last week.  The sting was part of a  undercover operation targeting individuals who respond to online advertisements on Backpage.com.  The online ads are usually listings for escort or massage services, but once the person responds to the hotel, the undercover deputies try to make an arrest for an illegal activity.  These undercover officers can be very aggressive and often do most of the talking.  The sheriff was also targeting human trafficking which is a much more serious felony offense. There are some harsh […]
  • Medical marijuana amendment fails in Florida, pot still illegal to possess. What defenses do you have to a possession of cannabis case?
    Florida’s medical marijuana amendment did not pass yesterday in the election.  Even though a majority of the voters voted in favor of passing the medical marijuana amendment, receiving 58% of the vote, it fell 2% shy needed to pass.  In 2006, Florida voters decided all constitutional amendments needed a “super majority” to pass (60% instead of 50%). Ironically, that amendment that now requires a super majority, only passed with 57.8% of the vote.  Whether or not the issue is placed back on the ballot is unknown at this time.  John Morgan of Morgan & Morgan who spearheaded the campaign had previously […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required