Whistleblower Fall Out Dogs Penn State University’s Mike McQueary
Cleveland, OH (Law Firm Newswire) December 5, 2012 - Being a whistleblower is not fun. It typically has a variety of consequences.
“Many whistleblowers face distain and are ostracized not only in their workplace, if they are still employed, but from other sources as well. One of the most high profile cases dealing with the fall out of being a whistleblower is the case filed by former Penn State assistant football coach, Mike McQueary,” said Tom Robenalt, a Cleveland whistleblower lawyer. Many will recognize the McQueary name from the Jerry Sandusky child molestation case.
This case was a hot potato to begin with, given the highly inflammatory nature of the allegations against Sandusky. And because it was such a high profile case, the judges in the country where the suit was filed all ended up removing themselves from hearing the matter, since they either had connections to the Second Mile charity or Penn State itself. Getting justice was beginning to look like a difficult proposition.
An out-of-county judge was assigned to handle this whistleblower case; a case that is asking the court of millions of dollars in damages from Penn State. McQueary’s statement of claim alleges the university defamed him when he blew the whistle on Sandusky, and in doing so, had made it impossible for him to continue his football career. McQueary told the court during the Sandusky trial he had seen some form of sexual encounter in 2001, in the campus showers.
He further stated that once he reported what he witnessed to the head-coach, he was relieved to hear the information had been passed on to the university president, vice president and the athletic director. It appears the buck stopped there, and in subsequent news releases, Penn State University president, Graham Spanier, supported the actions of his vice president and the athletic director. “The lawsuit states the releases were intended to pin the tail on the whistleblower by making him a scapegoat,” added Robenalt.
As a result of the fallout at Penn State, McQueary’s coaching contract was not renewed; a move that suggests he was being penalized for talking to and cooperating with investigators. He also lost back pay, benefits, and a bowl bonus and wishes to be reinstated.
Does this whistleblower lawsuit stand a chance in court? “It may,” indicated Robenalt,” if there is a clear connection between McQueary’s contract being terminated and his having spoken up and out about what he saw in the showers one day. That, of course, is for the court to decide.”
“Whistleblower lawsuits are far from easy and straightforward, and for this reason, if you are in a situation like this one, you need to seek competent legal counsel before filing a lawsuit. In fact, most courts will not hear a whistleblower lawsuit without an experienced attorney handling the matter,” Robenalt added.
Mellino Robenalt LLC
200 Public Sq., Suite 2900
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Call: (216) 241-1901
- What Is the Difference Between a Coma and Brain Death?
When someone suffers traumatic brain injury, coma and brain death are two possible outcomes. Although coma sometimes progresses to brain death, the two injured states are distinct and characterized by very different symptoms. Coma and Vegetative State Coma is a state of deep unconsciousness that lasts for an indeterminate length of time. While in this state, the brain continues to emit electrical impulse signals to the rest of the body, but it is working at the lowest possible level. A vegetative state is a coma from which the patient has recovered brain stem function but not higher cognitive abilities. Such […]
- Study Analyzes Use of Simvastatin and Environmental Enrichment on TBI Patients
A recent study published in the medical journal Brain Injury explored the use of Simvastatin and environmental enrichment on brain injury patients and the outcomes of each treatment. The target group of the study was patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injuries that affected their temporal order memory and spontaneous object recognition. Researchers used male Wistar rats in the study, and compared the therapeutic effects of both Simvastatin and environmental enrichment to see whether they improved memory and recognition and, if so, by how much. Here’s how they conducted the study: The rats arrived at the research facility. Seven […]
- Study Assesses Using Vyvanse to Treat Brain Injured People with ADHD
Attention deficit disorder is one of the most common and debilitating results of traumatic brain injuries. A recent study published in the journal Brain Injury looked at the effectiveness of Vyvanse in terms of treating attention deficit disorder caused by moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries. This is the first study of its kind among traumatic brain injury patients, being unique in that no other study has examined how stimulant medications can affect this disorder, rather than the typical methylphenidate. The study was conducted over 12 weeks and utilized a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind test with cross-over. Twenty-two patients were […]
See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: Cleveland medical malpractice, Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer, Cleveland whistleblower lawyer, Personal Injury Law Cleveland malpractice lawyer