Group Sues Arizona Over Policy to Deny Drivers Licenses to Deferred Action Young Immigrants
Dallas, TX (Law Firm Newswire) January 4, 2013 – An Arizona policy to deny state driver's licenses to some people is garnering protest.
A coalition of civil rights groups filed suit on November 29, 2012 to block an Arizona policy that denies driver's licenses to certain foreign nationals who are granted Deferred Action status and deemed temporarily eligible to remain and work in the U.S. by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
In a statement on the matter, Dallas immigration attorney Stewart Rabinowitz said, "Beyond mean-spiritedness, it is hard to see what Arizona's interest is in prohibiting issuance of state driver's licenses to beneficiaries of a federal program to permit certain, young, qualifying foreign nationals to remain in the U.S. and have employment authorization for a two-year period."
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer issued Arizona Executive Order 2012-06 on August 15 in the wake of the Department of Homeland Security's implementation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. The program allows certain young undocumented immigrants who have been in the United States for at least five years and who arrived prior to turning 16 to live and work in the U.S. for a renewable period of two years without threat of deportation. It does not confer lawful immigration status or provide a path to citizenship.
The Executive Order directs state agencies to prevent Deferred Action recipients from obtaining eligibility “for any taxpayer-funded public benefits and state identification, including a driver's license.”
The lawsuit claims that the state policy violates the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause by contradicting federal immigration law and violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by discriminating against certain foreign nationals.
Mr. Rabinowitz continued by adding, "If Arizona Republicans want to further alienate Hispanics, and frustrate federal immigration policy which has provided a reprieve from removal for such persons, this action will be an effective tool. Hispanics are one of the fastest growing minorities in the U.S. who were a critical voting block in the 2012 Presidential election, and their clout is likely to only grow. That fact does not portend well for Republicans."
Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C.
14901 Quorum Drive, Suite 580
Dallas, Texas 75254
- Two courts enjoin President Trump’s modified executive order
President Trump issued a new executive order on March 6, 2017 blocking citizens of six predominantly Muslim nations from entering the United States. Nine days later on March 15, 2017, a federal court in Hawaii issued an order enjoining the new travel ban followed by a Maryland federal court ruling against a core provision of ...
- USCIS Announces Suspension of H-1B Petition Premium Processing
In a surprise announcement on March 3, 2017, USCIS advised that it will suspend its premium processing service for all H-1B petitions starting April 3, 2017. April 3, 2017 is the earliest date that U.S. employers can file cap subject H-1B petitions for FY 2018, which begins on October 1, 2017. The suspension applies to ...
- Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upholds TRO against President Trump’s January 27, 2017 executive order
On February 9, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously upheld a temporary restraining order (TRO) against President Trump’s January 27 executive order preventing travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S. President Trump’s executive order banned for 90 days entry of individuals from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, ...