» Judge Says Plaintiff Not Likely to Acquire Cancer from Procedure, But Awards Millions in Damages

Judge Says Plaintiff Not Likely to Acquire Cancer from Procedure, But Awards Millions in Damages

Cleveland, OH (Law Firm Newswire) January 23, 2013 - There are some medical malpractice cases that have an unusual outcome. This is one of them.

Mellino Robenalt LLC has Cleveland Medical Malpractice and Personal Injury Attorneys

Mellino Robenalt LLC has Cleveland Medical Malpractice and Personal Injury Attorneys

“It’s not often a patient is awarded damages for maybe being a victim of medical malpractice. This case was quite unusual, and the chances of it happening again are likely questionable, but cannot be completely ruled out,” indicated Christopher Mellino, a Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer.

The story begins with a 70-year-old U.S. Air Force vet and his wife, who sued the U.S. government for medical malpractice. It seems that the veteran and his wife, sought damages of $30 million after alleging he came down with Hepatitis C, as a result of a colonoscopy conducted with less-than-sterile equipment. The procedure was done at a local VA hospital.

“The outcome of the trial was that the couple was awarded $1.25 million for their medical malpractice lawsuit,” said Mellino. “And there may be more cases to follow across the nation, as over 11,000 veterans had colonoscopies using equipment that had not been cleaned properly during a five year period in various VA facilities.”

Even though an expert medical witness, specializing in internal medicine, suggested at trial that there was a zero percent chance of the plaintiff acquiring hepatitis as a result of the colonoscopy, the judge ruled that the plaintiff could well be that one person in a large group who did get the virus, even though he had no other risk factors.

“Medical malpractice cases can certainly be unpredictable, as most of them are based on opinions of medical experts. The one thing to remember though, if you have been a victim of medical negligence, is that the results speak for themselves. Not all cases are like this one, and in others, the causal relationship between a medical error and a bad outcome is relatively clear. Someone then needs to be held accountable for their mistake,” Mellino added.

For individuals that feel they have been a victim of medical negligence, take the time to consult with an experienced medical malpractice lawyer. They understand the courts, the terminology, and know how to navigate the system to ensure a client gets justice.

To learn more or to contact a Cleveland whistleblower attorney, or visit http://www.mellinorobenalt.com.

Mellino Robenalt LLC
200 Public Sq., Suite 2900
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Call: (216) 241-1901

  • What Is the Difference Between a Coma and Brain Death?
    When someone suffers traumatic brain injury, coma and brain death are two possible outcomes. Although coma sometimes progresses to brain death, the two injured states are distinct and characterized by very different symptoms. Coma and Vegetative State Coma is a state of deep unconsciousness that lasts for an indeterminate length of time. While in this state, the brain continues to emit electrical impulse signals to the rest of the body, but it is working at the lowest possible level. A vegetative state is a coma from which the patient has recovered brain stem function but not higher cognitive abilities. Such […]
  • Study Analyzes Use of Simvastatin and Environmental Enrichment on TBI Patients
    A recent study published in the medical journal Brain Injury explored the use of Simvastatin and environmental enrichment on brain injury patients and the outcomes of each treatment. The target group of the study was patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injuries that affected their temporal order memory and spontaneous object recognition. Researchers used male Wistar rats in the study, and compared the therapeutic effects of both Simvastatin and environmental enrichment to see whether they improved memory and recognition and, if so, by how much. Here’s how they conducted the study: The rats arrived at the research facility. Seven […]
  • Study Assesses Using Vyvanse to Treat Brain Injured People with ADHD
    Attention deficit disorder is one of the most common and debilitating results of traumatic brain injuries. A recent study published in the journal Brain Injury looked at the effectiveness of Vyvanse in terms of treating attention deficit disorder caused by moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries. This is the first study of its kind among traumatic brain injury patients, being unique in that no other study has examined how stimulant medications can affect this disorder, rather than the typical methylphenidate. The study was conducted over 12 weeks and utilized a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind test with cross-over. Twenty-two patients were […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required