» Texas Oil and Gas Attorney Comments on Recent Suit by Texans For Unpaid Royalties

Texas Oil and Gas Attorney Comments on Recent Suit by Texans For Unpaid Royalties

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) February 6, 2013 – Texas residents have filed suit, alleging they are owed hydrocarbon royalty payments.

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Several Texas residents have filed a lawsuit against two companies alleging they were denied millions of dollars in royalty payments for hydrocarbons produced from a tract of land in Jefferson County, Texas.

“Title issues involving ownership of mineral rights and rights to royalty payments can be a complicated area of law. Disputes such as this one, involving the right to receive royalty payments, are not uncommon,” said Texas oil and gas attorney Gregory D. Jordan.

In the lawsuit, a half-dozen plaintiffs claim they are owed one-sixteenth of the revenue from oil produced by BP America Production Co. and Cimarex Energy, on land where the plaintiffs claim to own mineral rights. The suit was filed in Jefferson County Civil District Court in Beaumont, Texas.

The plaintiffs claim that under the 1933 deeds for the land, their predecessors were entitled to a one-sixteenth non-participating royalty interest in any oil produced from the property. According to the lawsuit, the deeds are still in effect and are now owned by the plaintiffs. Austin oil and gas attorney Jordan notes that “Interestingly, there are often circumstances through which royalty owners can recover payments that should have been made to them many years ago.”

The lawsuit states that Cimarex Energy has produced oil and gas from wells on property in which the plaintiffs have a royalty interest, that Cimarex and BP have made more than $100 million from the sale of oil produced from the lands, and that the companies have refused to pay the plaintiffs royalties, denying that any are owed.

The complaint alleges breach of contract against the defendants and asks the court to quiet title. The plaintiffs seek declaratory relief, damages within the jurisdictional limits of the court, interest and attorney’s fees. The case has been assigned to Judge Gary Sanderson of the 60th District Court.

BP, based in London, is the third-largest oil and gas company in the world, and the fourth-largest company of any kind. BP’s operations in the United States account for one-third of its business interests. Cimarex Energy is based in Denver.

The Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan has handled many business and employment disputes involving non-compete agreements, unfair competition, confidentiality agreements and breaches of contract. To learn more visit, http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com.

Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684

Other Practice Areas offered by the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan:

  • Business litigation
  • Employment law
  • Oil and gas law
  • Patent, trademark and copyright litigation
  • Real estate and construction litigation
    • Nigerian Oil Company Sues Rivals in Texas State Court, Alleging Tortious Interference
      A Nigerian oil company has filed a lawsuit in Texas state court, claiming that competing companies spread false information to derail a $1 billion lease offer the company made to Chevron. Brittania-U Nigeria Ltd. said that after its bids had been accepted by Chevron, Belema Oil Producing Ltd., Amni International Petroleum Development Co. Ltd. and [...]
    • Royalty owners ask Texas Supreme Court to allow lawsuit to proceed against Exxon Mobil
      Royalty owners have asked the Texas Supreme Court to allow litigation to move forward in their $21 million royalty lawsuit against Exxon Mobil after a new trial was granted on appeal. The royalty owners accuse Exxon of falsely informing them that the productivity of their wells was diminishing. This allegedly caused them to sell the [...]
    • Texas jury hears anti-trust claim
      A federal jury in Texas has heard opening arguments from a defunct steel distributor claiming that it was run out of business by a group of suppliers and manufacturers, including Nucor Corp. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. During opening arguments of the antitrust lawsuit, MM Steel LP’s attorney said that the larger companies had [...]

    See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

    Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

    * indicates required