» Austin Employment Attorney Comments on Nurse’s Lawsuit Over Termination

Austin Employment Attorney Comments on Nurse’s Lawsuit Over Termination

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) March 22, 2013 - A nurse has sued her former employer, saying she was fired for reporting patient neglect.

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Susan J. Rapp, a licensed vocational nurse who worked for Maxim Healthcare Services Inc., has filed a lawsuit against the company. Rapp claims that she was terminated after she reported another nurse's neglect of a patient to her supervisors. Maxim Healthcare is an in-home health care provider.

“The State of Texas has stringent laws to protect healthcare workers from certain forms of retaliation,” said Austin employment attorney Gregory D. Jordan. “One goal is to protect patients by preventing retaliation against workers that report substandard care.”

According to the lawsuit, Rapp was assigned to provide nursing services during the late shift at a patient's home. She claims she found that the day shift nurse repeatedly failed to provide the patient with proper care. Rapp claims that she reported the neglect to her supervisors, but the situation was not resolved and she was instructed not to document what she had observed in the patient's medical records. Rapp was terminated approximately two weeks later, allegedly for unprofessional behavior, inappropriate documentation in medical records, and crossing professional boundaries.

Austin employment lawyer Jordan notes, “Where substandard care is allegedly involved, any form of retaliation against the reporting individual should be dealt with swiftly and firmly.”

The lawsuit was filed in Denton County District Court, and the defendant removed it to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Richard A. Schell in the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division.

Although Rapp's original complaint alleged violation of the Texas Health & Safety Code, the amended complaint alleges violation of the Texas Occupations Code. Rapp claims to have made a report required or authorized, or reasonably believed to be required or authorized, by the Code, and to be protected from retaliation under its provisions.

The amended complaint requests damages for mental anguish, exemplary damages, court costs, attorney's fees and compensation for lost wages. Rapp also requests reinstatement to her former position or three months' severance pay.

The Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan has handled many business and employment disputes involving non-compete agreements, unfair competition, confidentiality agreements and breaches of contract. To learn more visit, http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com.

Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684

Other Practice Areas offered by the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan:

  • Business litigation
  • Employment law
  • Oil and gas law
  • Patent, trademark and copyright litigation
  • Real estate and construction litigation
    • Texas Appeals Court rules against lessee in offset well dispute
      The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas found that a lessee had failed to prove that it had drilled an offset well as required by oil and gas leases. In the case, Shirley Adams et al. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA, the lessors and royalty owners sued lessee Murphy for breach of [...]
    • Texas oil networking company files lawsuit for tortious interference, unfair competition
      A lawsuit has been filed by a networking website for oil workers, claiming that a Texas man who founded the company stole data to launch a competing business. Rigzone.com claims to host the resumes of over 2 million workers in the oil and gas industry. Workers post their resumes for free, and recruiters pay a [...]
    • Texas jury awards 1.5 million dollars to mineral rights owner
      A Harris County, Texas jury awarded $1.5 million to Jack Grynberg and his family, finding that Exxon Mobil did not act in good faith in determining the mineral royalties the company owed him. Grynberg says he is owed even more and is considering appealing the verdict. Grynberg says his royalties compensation could have been nearly [...]

    See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , , , , , ,



    Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

    * indicates required