Florida Supreme Court Stands By Restraints on Medical Malpractice Defendants
Tampa, FL (Law Firm Newswire) March 25, 2013 - The Florida Supreme Court recently handed a defeat to medical malpractice defense attorneys.
In a move seen as protecting patient confidentiality, the Court ruled that medical malpractice defendants are prohibited from meeting privately with plaintiffs' other doctors even if they do not attempt to acquire privileged medical information.
Tampa personal injury lawyer Robert Joyce, who is not involved in the case, commented, “This is an important reinforcement to an existing statute and Supreme Court decision already on the books. Medical malpractice defense attorneys cannot be permitted to endanger doctor-patient confidentiality, nor to improperly influence the outcomes of their cases.”
The case involved Ramsey Hasan, who sued his former dentist, Dr. Lanny Garvar. Hasan claimed Garvar neglected to properly diagnose his dental condition, which resulted in an infection that caused Hasan pain and suffering.
Garvar's malpractice insurance provider also provides insurance for Dr. Jennifer Schaumberg, an oral surgeon who treated Hasan after Garvar. Schaumberg's lawyer, who was chosen and hired by the insurer, sought to meet privately with Schaumberg to discuss the Garvar case with her. The attorney claimed not to seek access to Garvar's confidential medical information.
In a 5-2 decision, the Court negated two lower court rulings that would have permitted Schaumberg and her attorney to discuss the case.
Writing for the majority, Justice R. Fred Lewis said that permitting such discussions endangered patient confidentiality and characterized Garvar's attorney as “attempt[ing] to skirt the protections” of a 1988 law protecting doctor-patient privilege. He also cited a relevant Supreme Court decision from 1996 in which the justices said that such conferences would clearly violate the “purpose and spirit” of the 1988 law.
The lower courts said that the ruling did not apply to Garvar's case because it involved defense attorneys meeting with doctors they did not represent, whereas Schaumberg's attorney merely wished to discuss the matter with his own client. Garvar claimed Schaumberg's attorney would only discuss with Schaumberg the legal and professional implications of her involvement in the case and her potential need to testify.
The two dissenting justices said that the decision prevented doctors from obtaining legal advice to which they are entitled.
Joyce and Reyes Law Firm, P.A.
307 S Hyde Park Ave,
Tampa, FL 33606
View Larger Map
- Florida appeals court rules against some medical malpractice damages caps
In a victory for the rights of injured people, a Florida appeals court ruled that limits on certain damages for pain and suffering in personal injury cases are unconstitutional. In 2003, the Florida legislature set limits of $500,000 in “non-economic damages,” such as damages for pain and suffering, in personal injury cases. In 2014, the […]
- Administration proposes new rules to help prevent nursing home abuse
The Obama administration has proposed modernizing federal safety rules that nursing homes must abide by in order to receive Medicaid and Medicare payments. Sylvia Burwell, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, said that the proposed changes set high standards for safety and quality in nursing homes. The proposals were announced as part of the […]
- Father and son hit by boat propeller settle brain injury lawsuit for $12 million
A father and son who were seriously injured when a boat backed over them while they were scuba diving have settled their lawsuit against the scuba diving center for $12 million. Jared Adkins and his son settled the lawsuit against the Florida Keys Dive Center in Tavernier, after the dive center initially argued that it […]
See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: auto accident, brain injury, medical malpractice, Nursing home abuse, Tampa personal injury attorney, Tampa personal injury lawyer, wrongful death