Infected Doctor Transmits Hep B to Patients
Cleveland, OH (Law Firm Newswire) March 13, 2013 – It had to happen. A surgeon infects a patient with Hepatitis B.
“When someone goes to the hospital for an operation, they do not expect to come home and find out later they have Hepatitis B. That is what happened to several patients in Virginia, after having joint replacement surgery. Evidently, the surgeon became aware he was infected on submitting to routine blood tests after sticking himself with a needle,” explained Tom Robenalt, a Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer.
In this instance, the doctor had no symptoms, despite having emigrated from a country where there was a higher than usual incidence of Hepatitis B among the population. The negligence part of this case is the surgeon, once made aware of his chronic and infectious disease, kept practicing and ultimately infecting at least two of his patients. Tests are underway to determine if there are more of his patients infected.
“Apparently at least six other patients had been infected previously with the virus, but on testing recently, the disease was not found, making it questionable as to whether or not doctor was the original source of the infection. In a trial situation, the plaintiff’s attorney would make much of the point that past patients of the same doctor were infected, as were current patients of the doctor; not so much of a coincidence,” said Robenalt.
The main question at trial would be how the surgeon could justify putting patients at risk to contract a potentially deadly disease known for causing liver cancer. A medical professional with this type of infectious agent onboard has no place in an operating theater, which is painfully clear given the fact that two patients were definitely infected by the man, even with the usual safety procedures in place.
“Even though the man wore gloves, the disease was still passed to an unsuspecting, innocent patient who got more than they bargained for during surgery,” added Robenalt. A surgeon’s duty is to care for their patients and keep them safe, to follow the accepted standard of care that all surgeons in the same field would provide. “Operating on someone knowing you may pass on a fatal disease is egregious in the extreme.”
Patients that suspect they may have been infected by their doctors need to consult with an experienced medical malpractice lawyer. Do not wait too long. There is a statute of limitations, and if a lawsuit is not filed in time, any action is barred.
Mellino Robenalt LLC
200 Public Sq., Suite 2900
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Call: (216) 241-1901
- Morcellator Used During Hysterectomy May Spread Cancer
Did a doctor use a power morcellator during your hysterectomy or fibroid removal surgery? If so, attorney Chris Mellino welcomes you to contact our Cleveland office with any questions you may have. Anesthesiologist Brings Morcellator Danger to Light In October 2013, Dr. Amy Reed, an anesthesiologist and mother of six, underwent a laparoscopic hysterectomy to have fibroids removed. As umm.edu has stated, “Fibroids are the most common type of tumor found in female reproductive organs.” Typically, the word ‘tumor’ sends a patient into a panic, said WebMD. “But when it’s a fibroid tumor, experts say there is little to fear.” […]
- Anesthesia Malpractice Claims Suggest Increase in Surgical Fires
July 14, 2014, Crain’s reported that “a series of operating room fires” burned patients at the Cleveland Clinic in 2009 and 2010. Staff members were forced to undergo extensive training on how to prevent such incidents in the future, but hospitals in general are reluctant to change their procedures unless something happens in their own OR. In June 2013, a patient at another facility suffered second-degree burns to his neck and shoulders during an emergency tracheostomy. The surgical team violated the FDA’s Preventing Surgical Fires Initiative by using an alcohol-based cleanser to prep the patient’s skin, administering 100 percent oxygen, […]
- Military Hospital Malpractice Statistics
June 28, 2014, nytimes.com reported that military hospitals have “consistently had higher than expected rates of harm and complications in two central parts of its business — maternity care and surgery.” Since punishing doctors for medical malpractice hadn’t affected these statistics, in 2001, the Pentagon instructed military hospitals to conduct an investigation, or “root-cause analysis,” within 45 days of a debilitating injury or death. These reports were to be forwarded to the Pentagon’s patient-safety office where analysts would review what happened and come up with a solution to prevent it from happening again. “Unfortunately, R.C.A.s are used relatively infrequently,” a […]
See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: Cleveland medical malpractice, Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer, Cleveland whistleblower lawyer, Personal Injury Law Cleveland malpractice lawyer