Infected Doctor Transmits Hep B to Patients
Cleveland, OH (Law Firm Newswire) March 13, 2013 - It had to happen. A surgeon infects a patient with Hepatitis B.
“When someone goes to the hospital for an operation, they do not expect to come home and find out later they have Hepatitis B. That is what happened to several patients in Virginia, after having joint replacement surgery. Evidently, the surgeon became aware he was infected on submitting to routine blood tests after sticking himself with a needle,” explained Tom Robenalt, a Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer.
In this instance, the doctor had no symptoms, despite having emigrated from a country where there was a higher than usual incidence of Hepatitis B among the population. The negligence part of this case is the surgeon, once made aware of his chronic and infectious disease, kept practicing and ultimately infecting at least two of his patients. Tests are underway to determine if there are more of his patients infected.
“Apparently at least six other patients had been infected previously with the virus, but on testing recently, the disease was not found, making it questionable as to whether or not doctor was the original source of the infection. In a trial situation, the plaintiff’s attorney would make much of the point that past patients of the same doctor were infected, as were current patients of the doctor; not so much of a coincidence,” said Robenalt.
The main question at trial would be how the surgeon could justify putting patients at risk to contract a potentially deadly disease known for causing liver cancer. A medical professional with this type of infectious agent onboard has no place in an operating theater, which is painfully clear given the fact that two patients were definitely infected by the man, even with the usual safety procedures in place.
“Even though the man wore gloves, the disease was still passed to an unsuspecting, innocent patient who got more than they bargained for during surgery,” added Robenalt. A surgeon’s duty is to care for their patients and keep them safe, to follow the accepted standard of care that all surgeons in the same field would provide. “Operating on someone knowing you may pass on a fatal disease is egregious in the extreme.”
Patients that suspect they may have been infected by their doctors need to consult with an experienced medical malpractice lawyer. Do not wait too long. There is a statute of limitations, and if a lawsuit is not filed in time, any action is barred.
Mellino Robenalt LLC
200 Public Sq., Suite 2900
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Call: (216) 241-1901
- What Is the Difference Between a Coma and Brain Death?
When someone suffers traumatic brain injury, coma and brain death are two possible outcomes. Although coma sometimes progresses to brain death, the two injured states are distinct and characterized by very different symptoms. Coma and Vegetative State Coma is a state of deep unconsciousness that lasts for an indeterminate length of time. While in this state, the brain continues to emit electrical impulse signals to the rest of the body, but it is working at the lowest possible level. A vegetative state is a coma from which the patient has recovered brain stem function but not higher cognitive abilities. Such […]
- Study Analyzes Use of Simvastatin and Environmental Enrichment on TBI Patients
A recent study published in the medical journal Brain Injury explored the use of Simvastatin and environmental enrichment on brain injury patients and the outcomes of each treatment. The target group of the study was patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injuries that affected their temporal order memory and spontaneous object recognition. Researchers used male Wistar rats in the study, and compared the therapeutic effects of both Simvastatin and environmental enrichment to see whether they improved memory and recognition and, if so, by how much. Here’s how they conducted the study: The rats arrived at the research facility. Seven […]
- Study Assesses Using Vyvanse to Treat Brain Injured People with ADHD
Attention deficit disorder is one of the most common and debilitating results of traumatic brain injuries. A recent study published in the journal Brain Injury looked at the effectiveness of Vyvanse in terms of treating attention deficit disorder caused by moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries. This is the first study of its kind among traumatic brain injury patients, being unique in that no other study has examined how stimulant medications can affect this disorder, rather than the typical methylphenidate. The study was conducted over 12 weeks and utilized a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind test with cross-over. Twenty-two patients were […]
See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: Cleveland medical malpractice, Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer, Cleveland whistleblower lawyer, Personal Injury Law Cleveland malpractice lawyer