»  Social Security Changes Its Position on Reimbursements

Social Security Changes Its Position on Reimbursements

Moorestown, NJ (Law Firm Newswire) March 26, 2012 - The Special Needs Task Force worked with Social Security to change how it reimburses third parties.

Historically, the Social Security Administration (SSA) permitted parents or other family members of disabled beneficiaries of special needs trusts to buy items for the beneficiary and be reimbursed from the special needs trust. Of course, the family members were required to keep receipts and records of these purchases and furnish them to the trustee. Items might include clothing and other relatively small items that were easier for the parent to pick up and pay for than to request a distribution from the trustee directly to the provider of the goods or services.

In the spring of 2012, the SSA stated that such items of reimbursement were “unearned income” to the trust beneficiary. This had the effect of reducing the SSI payment to the trust beneficiary dollar-for-dollar and, if the reimbursement items exceeded the maximum federal benefit rate (2013 rate is $710 per month for an individual), then the SSI payment was lost. If the trust beneficiary’s Medicaid was linked to SSI, then Medicaid was lost as well.

On May 21, 2012, SSA contended that it was “clarifying” the Program Operating Manual System (POMS) and began reducing and eliminating benefits of the disabled. It is the document that Social Security eligibility workers look to for guidance. While technically, the POMS do not have the force of law, they are given great deference by the courts and are followed scrupulously by eligibility workers. The effect of this clarification by SSA was chaos for trust beneficiaries with disabilities, as well as parents and trustees.

"In response, an advocacy group was assembled, led by the Special Needs Alliance," stated Thomas D. Begley, Jr., New Jersey estate planning attorney and founding president of the Special Needs Alliance. "The Task Force held a series of meetings with SSA and was able to convince SSA that the policy enunciated in the spring made little sense and worked a hardship on all involved."

On February 8, 2013, the POMS were changed, authorizing a special needs trust to reimburse a third party, such as a parent or other family member, for expenditures made on behalf of the special needs trust beneficiary with disabilities. Such distributions for reimbursement are no longer considered unearned income. The changes are found at POM SI 01120.200.E.1.d and POMS SI 01120.201.I.1.f.

This change brings a sigh of relief to trust lawyers, beneficiaries and trustees alike. The Task Force continues to work with SSA in identifying primary issues such as this and advocate for the clients it serves.

To learn more about Begley Law Group call 1.800.533.7227 or visit www.begleylawgroup.com.

Begley Law Group, P.C.
509 S. Lenola Road, Building 7
Moorestown, NJ 08057
Tel: 800.533.7227


  • ESTABLISHING A DISABILITY ANNUITY TRUST FOR A BENEFICIARY RECEIVING SSDI OR SSI
    by Thomas D. Begley, Jr., CELA A Disability Annuity Trust (“DAT”) can be established for a disabled child or any disabled individual.[1] However, in considering the use of a DAT for a disabled person, care must be taken to examine the other government benefits currently being received, or which may be received in the future by the person with disabilities. If the person with disabilities is receiving Supplemental Security Disability Income (“SSDI”), this is usually accompanied by Medicare. SSDI and Medicare are insurance-based programs, rather than means-based programs. Receipt of income from the DAT would not cause a loss of [...]
  • WHAT DOES “SOLE BENEFIT OF” MEAN WITH RESPECT TO A DISABILITY ANNUITY TRUST
    by Thomas D. Begley, Jr., CELA The key issue concerning trusts “for the sole benefit of” is availability. In a private letter, HCFA, now CMS, has taken the position that a trust established for the sole benefit of a community spouse under HCFA Transmittal 64 is an available resource.[1] HCFA maintained that there is a material difference between a standard annuity and an “annuitized” trust. HCFA states: a standard annuity can protect the funds used to purchase the annuity from being counted as resources in determining eligibility for Medicaid. However, there is a fundamental difference between a standard annuity and [...]
  • DISABILITY ANNUITY TRUSTS
    by Thomas D. Begley, Jr., CELA The Concept. A sole benefit of trust is a creature of HCFA Transmittal 64.[1] These trusts have traditionally been used in crisis planning. They can be established for the benefit of disabled persons—a Disability Annuity Trust (“DAT”).[2] The idea is that assets would be transferred to an irrevocable trust for the sole benefit of the disabled individual. The assets in the trust were then paid out to the beneficiary on an actuarially sound basis using the actuarial tables contained in HCFA Transmittal 64.[3] However, some states, including New Jersey, maintain that despite the clear [...]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required