Social Security Changes Its Position on Reimbursements
Moorestown, NJ (Law Firm Newswire) March 26, 2012 - The Special Needs Task Force worked with Social Security to change how it reimburses third parties.
Historically, the Social Security Administration (SSA) permitted parents or other family members of disabled beneficiaries of special needs trusts to buy items for the beneficiary and be reimbursed from the special needs trust. Of course, the family members were required to keep receipts and records of these purchases and furnish them to the trustee. Items might include clothing and other relatively small items that were easier for the parent to pick up and pay for than to request a distribution from the trustee directly to the provider of the goods or services.
In the spring of 2012, the SSA stated that such items of reimbursement were “unearned income” to the trust beneficiary. This had the effect of reducing the SSI payment to the trust beneficiary dollar-for-dollar and, if the reimbursement items exceeded the maximum federal benefit rate (2013 rate is $710 per month for an individual), then the SSI payment was lost. If the trust beneficiary’s Medicaid was linked to SSI, then Medicaid was lost as well.
On May 21, 2012, SSA contended that it was “clarifying” the Program Operating Manual System (POMS) and began reducing and eliminating benefits of the disabled. It is the document that Social Security eligibility workers look to for guidance. While technically, the POMS do not have the force of law, they are given great deference by the courts and are followed scrupulously by eligibility workers. The effect of this clarification by SSA was chaos for trust beneficiaries with disabilities, as well as parents and trustees.
"In response, an advocacy group was assembled, led by the Special Needs Alliance," stated Thomas D. Begley, Jr., New Jersey estate planning attorney and founding president of the Special Needs Alliance. "The Task Force held a series of meetings with SSA and was able to convince SSA that the policy enunciated in the spring made little sense and worked a hardship on all involved."
On February 8, 2013, the POMS were changed, authorizing a special needs trust to reimburse a third party, such as a parent or other family member, for expenditures made on behalf of the special needs trust beneficiary with disabilities. Such distributions for reimbursement are no longer considered unearned income. The changes are found at POM SI 01120.200.E.1.d and POMS SI 01120.201.I.1.f.
This change brings a sigh of relief to trust lawyers, beneficiaries and trustees alike. The Task Force continues to work with SSA in identifying primary issues such as this and advocate for the clients it serves.
To learn more about Begley Law Group call 1.800.533.7227 or visit www.begleylawgroup.com.
Begley Law Group, P.C.
509 S. Lenola Road, Building 7
Moorestown, NJ 08057
- RESOLVING MEDICARE ADVANTAGE, PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLAN, VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, TRICARE AND WELFARE LIENS IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES
by Thomas D. Begley, Jr., CELA Medicare Advantage and Prescription Drug Plans Medicare Part C, commonly known as Medicare Advantage, is a Medicare substitute program operated by private health insurance companies as a managed care plan. Medicare Part D similarly provides prescription coverage to eligible beneficiaries through private insurance plans. To the extent a reimbursement right may be created under a specific MAO plan, the Part C statute itself limits any recovery from a beneficiary to the amount actually received from a third party as payment for plan-covered expenses. Veterans Administration and TRICARE Claims The Veterans’ Benefits Act and the [...]
- RESOLVING MENTAL HEALTH LIENS, TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY FUND LIENS, CATASTROPHIC ILLNESS IN CHILDREN RELIEF FUND LIENS IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES
by Thomas D. Begley, Jr., CELA Mental Health Liens In New Jersey, a person with a mental illness who is over age 18 and is being treated in a state psychiatric hospital shall be liable for the full cost of his treatment, maintenance, and all necessary related expenses. Although this statute does include a repayment obligation, it does not appear to impose a lien, particularly with respect to personal injury claims. Traumatic Brain Injury Fund The New Jersey Traumatic Brain Injury Fund is the payer of last resort for costs of post-acute care, services, and financial assistance provided to [...]
- RESOLVING HOSPITAL, CHILD SUPPORT AND DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES LIENS IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES
by Thomas D. Begley, Jr., CELA Hospital Liens Generally, every hospital, nursing home, licensed physician, or dentist may assert a lien for services rendered by way of treatment, care, or maintenance to any person who has sustained personal injuries in an accident as a result of negligence or alleged negligence of any other person. The lien attaches to the proceeds of any settlement, award, or judgment an injured person may obtain from a third party as a result of the injuries for which services were provided. Hospital liens may be difficult to negotiate; however, such liens are subject to [...]
See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: new jersey elder law, new jersey elder law attorney, new jersey estate planning, new jersey estate planning attorney, new jersey estate planning lawyer, New Jersey personal injury settlement consultant, New Jersey Special Needs attorney, New Jersey Special Needs Lawyer, New Jersey Special Needs planning, new jersey veterans law, nj elder, nj estate planning, nj estate planning attorney