Social Security Changes Its Position on Reimbursements
Moorestown, NJ (Law Firm Newswire) March 26, 2012 - The Special Needs Task Force worked with Social Security to change how it reimburses third parties.
Historically, the Social Security Administration (SSA) permitted parents or other family members of disabled beneficiaries of special needs trusts to buy items for the beneficiary and be reimbursed from the special needs trust. Of course, the family members were required to keep receipts and records of these purchases and furnish them to the trustee. Items might include clothing and other relatively small items that were easier for the parent to pick up and pay for than to request a distribution from the trustee directly to the provider of the goods or services.
In the spring of 2012, the SSA stated that such items of reimbursement were “unearned income” to the trust beneficiary. This had the effect of reducing the SSI payment to the trust beneficiary dollar-for-dollar and, if the reimbursement items exceeded the maximum federal benefit rate (2013 rate is $710 per month for an individual), then the SSI payment was lost. If the trust beneficiary’s Medicaid was linked to SSI, then Medicaid was lost as well.
On May 21, 2012, SSA contended that it was “clarifying” the Program Operating Manual System (POMS) and began reducing and eliminating benefits of the disabled. It is the document that Social Security eligibility workers look to for guidance. While technically, the POMS do not have the force of law, they are given great deference by the courts and are followed scrupulously by eligibility workers. The effect of this clarification by SSA was chaos for trust beneficiaries with disabilities, as well as parents and trustees.
"In response, an advocacy group was assembled, led by the Special Needs Alliance," stated Thomas D. Begley, Jr., New Jersey estate planning attorney and founding president of the Special Needs Alliance. "The Task Force held a series of meetings with SSA and was able to convince SSA that the policy enunciated in the spring made little sense and worked a hardship on all involved."
On February 8, 2013, the POMS were changed, authorizing a special needs trust to reimburse a third party, such as a parent or other family member, for expenditures made on behalf of the special needs trust beneficiary with disabilities. Such distributions for reimbursement are no longer considered unearned income. The changes are found at POM SI 01120.200.E.1.d and POMS SI 01120.201.I.1.f.
This change brings a sigh of relief to trust lawyers, beneficiaries and trustees alike. The Task Force continues to work with SSA in identifying primary issues such as this and advocate for the clients it serves.
To learn more about Begley Law Group call 1.800.533.7227 or visit www.begleylawgroup.com.
Begley Law Group, P.C.
509 S. Lenola Road, Building 7
Moorestown, NJ 08057
- Ethan Ordog to Make Presentation on Special Needs Trusts & Guardianships
This Thursday, May 26th, Begley Law Group partner Ethan J. Ordog, Esquire, in association with Advocates for Special Kids (ASK), will be making a presentation on the topic of Trust and Guardianship considerations for families with special needs children. The program is being presented in conjunction with the Mount Laurel school system and will be held at the Larchmont Media Center from 6:30 to 8:30.
- MEDICAID MANAGED LONG-TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS
by Melanie S. Kaplan, Esquire As of July 1, 2014, what was formerly known as Global Options for Long Term Care (GO) is now known as Managed Long Term Services and Supports. (MLTSS). Individuals previously receiving benefits under AIDS Community Care Alternatives Program (ACCAP), Community Resources for People with Disabilities (CRPD) and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) were automatically enrolled in the MLTSS program. The MLTSS program was designed to permit individuals to live in the community for as long as possible with services and support. The change from GO to the MLTSS program has reduced the number of programs and [...]
- COMPARISON BETWEEN TRANSFERS TO INCOME ONLY TRUSTS AND TRANSFERS TO CHILDREN
by Thomas D. Begley, Jr., CELA The following chart compares the advantages and disadvantages of an outright transfer of assets and putting assets in an Income Only Trust. Trusts v. Transfers Comparison Issue Income Only Trusts Children Look-Back 5 Years 5 Years Control None None Risk Avoidance Yes No Estate Recovery Maybe No Income Tax Parent Children Gift Tax Maybe Yes Step Up in Basis Yes No Principal Residence Exclus. Yes No
See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: new jersey elder law, new jersey elder law attorney, new jersey estate planning, new jersey estate planning attorney, new jersey estate planning lawyer, New Jersey personal injury settlement consultant, New Jersey Special Needs attorney, New Jersey Special Needs Lawyer, New Jersey Special Needs planning, new jersey veterans law, nj elder, nj estate planning, nj estate planning attorney