»  Social Security Changes Its Position on Reimbursements

Social Security Changes Its Position on Reimbursements

Moorestown, NJ (Law Firm Newswire) March 26, 2012 – The Special Needs Task Force worked with Social Security to change how it reimburses third parties.

Historically, the Social Security Administration (SSA) permitted parents or other family members of disabled beneficiaries of special needs trusts to buy items for the beneficiary and be reimbursed from the special needs trust. Of course, the family members were required to keep receipts and records of these purchases and furnish them to the trustee. Items might include clothing and other relatively small items that were easier for the parent to pick up and pay for than to request a distribution from the trustee directly to the provider of the goods or services.

In the spring of 2012, the SSA stated that such items of reimbursement were “unearned income” to the trust beneficiary. This had the effect of reducing the SSI payment to the trust beneficiary dollar-for-dollar and, if the reimbursement items exceeded the maximum federal benefit rate (2013 rate is $710 per month for an individual), then the SSI payment was lost. If the trust beneficiary’s Medicaid was linked to SSI, then Medicaid was lost as well.

On May 21, 2012, SSA contended that it was “clarifying” the Program Operating Manual System (POMS) and began reducing and eliminating benefits of the disabled. It is the document that Social Security eligibility workers look to for guidance. While technically, the POMS do not have the force of law, they are given great deference by the courts and are followed scrupulously by eligibility workers. The effect of this clarification by SSA was chaos for trust beneficiaries with disabilities, as well as parents and trustees.

“In response, an advocacy group was assembled, led by the Special Needs Alliance,” stated Thomas D. Begley, Jr., New Jersey estate planning attorney and founding president of the Special Needs Alliance. “The Task Force held a series of meetings with SSA and was able to convince SSA that the policy enunciated in the spring made little sense and worked a hardship on all involved.”

On February 8, 2013, the POMS were changed, authorizing a special needs trust to reimburse a third party, such as a parent or other family member, for expenditures made on behalf of the special needs trust beneficiary with disabilities. Such distributions for reimbursement are no longer considered unearned income. The changes are found at POM SI 01120.200.E.1.d and POMS SI 01120.201.I.1.f.

This change brings a sigh of relief to trust lawyers, beneficiaries and trustees alike. The Task Force continues to work with SSA in identifying primary issues such as this and advocate for the clients it serves.

To learn more about Begley Law Group call 1.800.533.7227 or visit www.begleylawgroup.com.

Begley Law Group, P.C.
509 S. Lenola Road, Building 7
Moorestown, NJ 08057
Tel: 800.533.7227


  • PLAN/NJ Celebrates 25 Years Of Service And Honors Thomas Begley Jr.
    In 2014 Planned Lifetime Assistance Network of New Jersey celebrated 25 years of service to individuals with severe developmental disabilities and mental health challenges. To commemorate the occasion, PLAN held a wonderful event on June 5th at the New Jersey Law Center, located at One Constitution Square in New Brunswick, NJ. The festivities included cocktails, hors d’oeuvres, a special celebrity silent fundraising auction and a keynote address by Sarah Helena Vazquez, national motivational speaker, advocate, and author.   In addition that evening, PLAN honored several distinguished individuals who have made significant and long-term contributions in improving outcomes and enhancing the quality of [...]
  • THE IMPORTANCE OF PUBLIC BENEFITS IN SETTLING PERSONAL INJURY CASES
    Article by Thomas D. Begley Jr. Public benefits must always be considered in the settlement of a personal injury case.  They are important for two reasons:  (1) whether there is a lien to repay the public benefits, and (2) whether the plaintiff’s continued eligibility for public benefits depends on the establishment of a self-settled special needs trust.  Common public benefits include the following: Supplemental Security Income (SSI)  SSI is a monthly payment from the Social Security Administration to the SSI recipient.  The maximum payment for an individual for 2014 is $721 per month.[1]  For many people this is a significant [...]
  • THE IMPACT OF WINDSOR ON TAX AND PUBLIC BENEFITS PLANNING FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES PART II
    Article by Thomas D. Begley Jr. This is the second part of a two-part article dealing with the impact of Windsor on taxation and public benefits.  This article will examine the impact of Windsor on public benefits planning. In United States v. Windsor,[1] the United States Supreme Court declared §3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional.  This section limited marriage to a union between one man and one woman.  Windsor did not apply to §2 of DOMA, which permits states to refuse to recognize the actions of another state on the issue of same-sex marriage.  Therefore, a couple [...]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required