» Texas Landowners Sue Over Keystone Oil Pipeline

Texas Landowners Sue Over Keystone Oil Pipeline

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) April 30, 2013 - Texas landowners are suing TransCanada Corp. over the Keystone XL Pipeline.

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

The landowners argue that TransCanada does not qualify as a common carrier and does not have the right to acquire their property through eminent domain to build the oil pipeline. The planned pipeline would transport Canadian tar-sands oil to refineries on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.

“These cases involve two important interests in the state of Texas: oil and property rights,” said Gregory D. Jordan, a Texas oil and gas attorney.

The landowners argue that TransCanada is not a common carrier and cannot acquire property by condemnation. District Court Judge Tom Rugg ruled against one group of landowners in September, saying that the acquisition of the land is constitutional and the pipeline can proceed. The landowners are appealing to the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont, Texas. Several similar cases are making their way through the Texas courts.

The landowners are attempting to build on a landmark 2011 ruling from the Texas Supreme Court in the case of Texas Rice Land Partners Ltd. v. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas LLC, which made it more difficult for pipeline operators to claim common carrier status. The issue in that case was whether a pipeline was truly available for public use, or was intended for private use and was a common carrier in name only.

In the Denbury case, the Denbury Green pipeline company had attempted to establish itself as a common carrier of carbon dioxide by indicating that status in an application to the Texas Railroad Commission. Texas Rice Land Partners refused to allow the company access to its land for surveying purposes, which led to the court battle. A lower court granted a motion for summary judgment by Denbury Green, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, stating that when a landowner challenges common-carrier status, the company must do more to prove that the pipeline is available for public use.

Austin oil and gas lawyer Jordan notes, “Many pipelines cross our great state, but Denbury has helped level the playing field for landowners who want to stop really 'private' pipelines from being built on their land.”

The Texas lawsuits are potentially the last hurdle keeping TransCanada from building the southern extension of the oil pipeline from Cushing, Oklahoma to the Texas coast. Another extension of the pipeline, from Alberta, Canada, to Steele City, Nebraska, has been delayed by environmental concerns and still needs U.S. government approval.

The Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan has handled many business and employment disputes involving non-compete agreements, unfair competition, confidentiality agreements and breaches of contract. To learn more visit, http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com.

Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684

Other Practice Areas offered by the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan:

  • Business litigation
  • Employment law
  • Oil and gas law
  • Patent, trademark and copyright litigation
  • Real estate and construction litigation
    • Eight ex-employees of Texas sanitation company claim racial discrimination
      Eight African American employees of a Texas sanitation company have filed a lawsuit claiming discrimination and retaliation. Dantrell Patterson, Lamonte Young, Demetrius Patterson, Tadarious Dixon, Keithdrick Patterson, Jarvis Hill, Jermaine Bell and Derrick Robert filed the lawsuit against Sanitation Solutions Inc. in the Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas on April 20. The [...]
    • Pipeline owners file $300 million breach of contract lawsuit against midstream operator
      An amended breach of contract lawsuit was filed by Magellan Midstream Partners and Plains All American Pipeline against Stampede Energy, seeking over $300 million in damages over an oil transport deal. The lawsuit claims that Stampede did not meet minimum volume obligations on the BridgeTex pipeline from March 2015 through 2016, breaching its contract. The [...]
    • Texas appeals court’s decision shows importance of wording in noncompete agreements
      A recent decision by a Texas appeals court demonstrates that the wording of a noncompete agreement must be precise. In the case, East Texas Copy Systems, Inc. v. Player, the Court of Appeals in Texarkana ruled that a noncompete agreement was nonbinding due to the language used in the agreement. As part of the sale [...]

    See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , , , , , ,



    Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

    * indicates required