» Texas Landowners Sue Over Keystone Oil Pipeline

Texas Landowners Sue Over Keystone Oil Pipeline

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) April 30, 2013 - Texas landowners are suing TransCanada Corp. over the Keystone XL Pipeline.

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

The landowners argue that TransCanada does not qualify as a common carrier and does not have the right to acquire their property through eminent domain to build the oil pipeline. The planned pipeline would transport Canadian tar-sands oil to refineries on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.

“These cases involve two important interests in the state of Texas: oil and property rights,” said Gregory D. Jordan, a Texas oil and gas attorney.

The landowners argue that TransCanada is not a common carrier and cannot acquire property by condemnation. District Court Judge Tom Rugg ruled against one group of landowners in September, saying that the acquisition of the land is constitutional and the pipeline can proceed. The landowners are appealing to the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont, Texas. Several similar cases are making their way through the Texas courts.

The landowners are attempting to build on a landmark 2011 ruling from the Texas Supreme Court in the case of Texas Rice Land Partners Ltd. v. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas LLC, which made it more difficult for pipeline operators to claim common carrier status. The issue in that case was whether a pipeline was truly available for public use, or was intended for private use and was a common carrier in name only.

In the Denbury case, the Denbury Green pipeline company had attempted to establish itself as a common carrier of carbon dioxide by indicating that status in an application to the Texas Railroad Commission. Texas Rice Land Partners refused to allow the company access to its land for surveying purposes, which led to the court battle. A lower court granted a motion for summary judgment by Denbury Green, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, stating that when a landowner challenges common-carrier status, the company must do more to prove that the pipeline is available for public use.

Austin oil and gas lawyer Jordan notes, “Many pipelines cross our great state, but Denbury has helped level the playing field for landowners who want to stop really 'private' pipelines from being built on their land.”

The Texas lawsuits are potentially the last hurdle keeping TransCanada from building the southern extension of the oil pipeline from Cushing, Oklahoma to the Texas coast. Another extension of the pipeline, from Alberta, Canada, to Steele City, Nebraska, has been delayed by environmental concerns and still needs U.S. government approval.

The Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan has handled many business and employment disputes involving non-compete agreements, unfair competition, confidentiality agreements and breaches of contract. To learn more visit, http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com.

Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684

Other Practice Areas offered by the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan:

  • Business litigation
  • Employment law
  • Oil and gas law
  • Patent, trademark and copyright litigation
  • Real estate and construction litigation
    • Texas appeals court rules in lawsuit over gas well blowout costs
      A Texas appeals court issued a ruling in a lawsuit over costs associated with the blowout of a gas well. The Eleventh Court of Appeals issued its opinion Aug. 31, 2015 in the case of St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Appellants v. Petroplex Energy, Inc, Appellee, [...]
    • Texas jury awards over 60 million dollars in oil and gas lease breach of fiduciary duty case
      A Texas jury awarded over $60 million to investors in an oil and gas breach of fiduciary duty case. The plaintiff investors claimed that their business partners gave themselves credit for financial contributions that were not actually made and excluded the investors from a lease acquisition project when the defendants learned that it would be [...]
    • Texas employment lawsuit claims company made employees work off the clock
      An employee at a Texas call center has filed a lawsuit claiming that she and other employees were not paid for work that they were required to do off the clock. Elissa Shetzer filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against her employer, Harte-Hanks Response Management/Austin LP, which manages [...]

    See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

    Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

    * indicates required