» Normal Faculties In A DUI Case May “Not” Be Impaired, Despite Police Charging A Driver

Normal Faculties In A DUI Case May “Not” Be Impaired, Despite Police Charging A Driver

Lakeland, FL (Law Firm Newswire) May 6, 2013 – Can a driver arrested for DUI who refuses to blow be proven guilty?

“I get this question a lot when people contact me for my help with DUI charges,” indicated Thomas Grajek, a Lakeland criminal defense attorney. “They want to know if they refused to submit to a breath test, how can anyone prove they are guilty. There is a common fallacy that if you don’t blow, the charge has to be dismissed, because a prosecutor can’t prove the driver was over 0.08. This is wrong.”

Under the Florida DUI statue, 316.193, a person is guilty if a prosecutor proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the individual driver the police arrested had a breath test result or level higher than 0.08 at the time they were stopped and arrested. Or, that the driver the police arrested was under the influence of something that impaired their normal faculties.

What is the definition of normal faculties? “Normal faculties may include, but are not limited to an arrested driver’s ability to make judgments, drive, judge distances, talk coherently and walk in a normal manner, barring a physical disability. To prove a driver’s faculties were impaired, a prosecutor would run a copy of the DUI video, if there is one,” Grajek explained.

In some counties in Florida, such as Polk County, the Sheriff’s Office does not videotape DUI arrests, which would open the door to a number of defenses and create a situation where he said/she said, and who is right or wrong? Since there is no visual evidence, any case made would boil down to either the physical evidence of a breath or blood test, etc., or if the person refused to blow, the officer’s assessment of the person’s normal faculties.

“Without visual evidence, such as a videotape, the prosecutor has the officer testify relating to the indicators of impairment at the time of arrest. That may include the individual’s appearance, if their speech was slurred, how they responded on field sobriety tests and so forth,” explained Grajek.
Only an experienced Lakeland criminal defense attorney knows how to tell the jury that an individual is not guilty of DUI, and he does that by showing that the driver’s normal faculties were not impaired. This may be done in a number of ways, such as referring to a person’s normal driving pattern, that the driver got out of the car without any issues, they performed well on the field tests and did not slur when speaking, etc.

“Also, a case may be defended by pointing out the DUI officer did not take the time to thoroughly explain the field exercises, or wrongly interpreted/graded the driver’s performance, as in not according to the National Highway Safety and Traffic Administration manual,” Grajek outlined. Every driver arrested for DUI is entitled and deserves a vigorous criminal defense. This is not something an individual should attempt to do alone.

For more information about Lakeland criminal defense lawyer Thomas Grajek, go to http://www.flcrimedefense.com/ or call 863-688-4606.

Thomas C. Grajek
206 Easton Drive, Suite 102
Lakeland, FL 33803
Phone: 863.688.4606


View Larger Map

  • Criminal Profiling is not just done on TV
    The law enforcement tactic of criminal profiling, pioneered by FBI Agent John Douglas, is not just a tool injected into TV shows for extra entertainment, but is a reality in law enforcement, even used to try and hunt down Jack the Ripper in London. Profiling does not take place in a vacuum and investigators rely on any evidence found at a crime scene to draw conclusions. Other important aspects police consider are the crime location, the circumstances of the crime, whether it is similar in nature to another crime (using the same modus operandi), if there is any physical evidence […]
  • Sexually Dangerous Convicts Can be Held Indefinitely
    The government now has more power and discretion in holding sexually dangerous convicts. At one time, once a sexually dangerous inmate served a full sentence, he or she was released. The U.S. Supreme Court has now indicated this may no longer be the case when it comes to sexually dangerous convicts. How is a convict classified as being sexually dangerous? There are two conditions that an inmate must meet prior to receiving this classification. In the first, a court must see clear evidence and convincing proof that the convict would not be able to stop molesting children or cease sexually […]
  • Arrest made in Polk County "SWAT"ting incident involving "anonymous" calls to police to lure SWAT team to high school.
    A Canadian juvenile was arrested in the recent Polk County “swatting” case.  “SWATting” is when an individual attempts to lure the SWAT time to respond to a location for a fake threat of some type. Polk County deputies allege the teen anonymously placed hoax calls to law enforcement officials in an effort to lure SWAT teams to respond to Ft. Meade high school over the past four-months.  Deputies say the investigation began in September, when an unidentified male called the sheriff’s office and Fort Meade High School and said he was going to “drive to Fort Meade High School in […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required