» Not All Medical Malpractice Cases Succeed In Court Says Cleveland Medical Malpractice Lawyer

Not All Medical Malpractice Cases Succeed In Court Says Cleveland Medical Malpractice Lawyer

Cleveland, OH (Law Firm Newswire) May 8, 2013 – Not all bad medical outcomes are the result of physician malpractice. This case is such an example.

Mellino Robenalt LLC has Cleveland Medical Malpractice and Personal Injury Attorneys

Mellino Robenalt LLC has Cleveland Medical Malpractice and Personal Injury Attorneys

“This case resulted in a win for the defense, and two doctors sued for medical malpractice were absolved in misdiagnosing and improperly treating preeclampsia. The jury handed down the verdict after several days of deliberation on the facts of the case,” explained Tom Robenalt, a Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer.

The plaintiff filed a medical malpractice lawsuit in 2009, stating the two doctors involved in the birth of her child caused her to lose her sight. The doctors sued had provided prenatal care and an emergency C-section to deliver her baby. In court documents, it was alleged that the mother was displaying symptoms of preeclampsia prior to the C-section, and that because of the symptoms she had, the doctor should have diagnosed the problem correctly. In short, by the time the mother arrived at the emergency room, it should have been obvious what the issue was and been attended to quickly.

On closer inspection of the medical records relating to the incident, it was discovered that the plaintiff’s prenatal care had not involved any signals that would lead the doctor to believe preeclampsia was a possibility. Additionally, the E.R. doctor did suspect preeclampsia, but the woman was too early in her pregnancy to immediately perform an emergency delivery without checking out other alternatives.

“One of the alternatives was to put the woman on immediate bed rest and perform lab tests. This was done and once the tests came back the next day indicating a positive finding for preeclampsia, the emergency C-section was performed,” related Robenalt. During the delivery, the plaintiff was temporarily blinded, but subsequently, most of her sight returned. She even made several other visits to both doctors after the delivery.

Based on the information in the medical file, the circumstances and the fact the plaintiff’s sight had returned, and she continued to doctor with the same physicians, the jury handed down a verdict for the defendant. It was a case that might have gone either way, as many medical malpractice lawsuits do.

“Never let the fear of possibly losing a case stop you from seeking experienced help from a medical malpractice lawyer,” said Robenalt, “Each case is different and so is each jury. You cannot always tell how they will find. One thing is certain though, if you ‘do’ have a valid case, it ‘will’ be taken to court to seek justice.”

To learn more or to contact a Cleveland medical malpractice attorney, or visit http://www.mellinorobenalt.com.

Mellino Robenalt LLC
200 Public Sq., Suite 2900
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Call: (216) 241-1901

  • Morcellator Used During Hysterectomy May Spread Cancer
    Did a doctor use a power morcellator during your hysterectomy or fibroid removal surgery? If so, attorney Chris Mellino welcomes you to contact our Cleveland office with any questions you may have. Anesthesiologist Brings Morcellator Danger to Light In October 2013, Dr. Amy Reed, an anesthesiologist and mother of six, underwent a laparoscopic hysterectomy to have fibroids removed. As umm.edu has stated, “Fibroids are the most common type of tumor found in female reproductive organs.” Typically, the word ‘tumor’ sends a patient into a panic, said WebMD. “But when it’s a fibroid tumor, experts say there is little to fear.” […]
  • Anesthesia Malpractice Claims Suggest Increase in Surgical Fires
    July 14, 2014, Crain’s reported that “a series of operating room fires” burned patients at the Cleveland Clinic in 2009 and 2010. Staff members were forced to undergo extensive training on how to prevent such incidents in the future, but hospitals in general are reluctant to change their procedures unless something happens in their own OR. In June 2013, a patient at another facility suffered second-degree burns to his neck and shoulders during an emergency tracheostomy. The surgical team violated the FDA’s Preventing Surgical Fires Initiative by using an alcohol-based cleanser to prep the patient’s skin, administering 100 percent oxygen, […]
  • Military Hospital Malpractice Statistics
    June 28, 2014, nytimes.com reported that military hospitals have “consistently had higher than expected rates of harm and complications in two central parts of its business — maternity care and surgery.” Since punishing doctors for medical malpractice hadn’t affected these statistics, in 2001, the Pentagon instructed military hospitals to conduct an investigation, or “root-cause analysis,” within 45 days of a debilitating injury or death. These reports were to be forwarded to the Pentagon’s patient-safety office where analysts would review what happened and come up with a solution to prevent it from happening again. “Unfortunately, R.C.A.s are used relatively infrequently,” a […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required