» Austin Oil and Gas Attorney Stresses Importance of Lease Clause Prohibiting Cost Deductions

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney Stresses Importance of Lease Clause Prohibiting Cost Deductions

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) June 28, 2013 - When landowners enter into a lease with an oil and gas company, they should include a clause that the company cannot deduct costs from their royalties.

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

“To protect your royalties, a lease should clearly provide that the driller cannot make deductions based on the costs of processing, transporting or marketing the oil or natural gas,” said Gregory Jordan, an Austin oil and gas attorney. “There are numerous examples of provisions that were intended to accomplish this result that have been held in case law to not quite cut it,” notes Jordan. “It is important to have a knowledgeable oil and gas attorney assist you with a lease so that you can make sure such a clause will be effective under the law.”

The importance of a “no deductions” clause has been made clear by several recent lawsuits. In August 2011, Chesapeake Energy sent letters to royalty owners in Texas and other states saying that the company would start deducting “post-production costs” from the sales price for natural gas used to calculate payments of royalties.

At that time, Chesapeake said that if a royalty owner's lease prohibited such deductions, then there would be no change in payments to that owner. However, the company has been accused of making such deductions, even from payments to owners whose leases did contain such a clause, according to recent lawsuits.

“Language in your lease prohibiting deductions puts you on much stronger footing should a company attempt to make such deductions,” said Jordan. “It does not mean that a dispute is impossible, but it provides strong evidence for your side.”

According to a Bloomberg News report, Chesapeake is facing at least eight lawsuits in five different states claiming underpayments of natural gas royalties. A lawsuit by landowners in Johnson County, Texas, seeks class action status. For its part, Chesapeake claims that it had always been permitted to make the deductions for post-production costs, but had chosen not to do so until 2011. Such costs, which can vary greatly, can constitute a large percentage of the royalty.

In the class action lawsuit, Chesapeake has asked the court for a dismissal, claiming that the “no deductions” clause should be regarded as “mere surplusage” that should be ignored. This illustrates one reason why it is important to have a knowledgeable oil and gas attorney involved in the leasing process. In Arlington, Texas, a neighborhood group achieved results without legal action, convincing Chesapeake to reinstate higher royalty payments based on the “no deductions” clause in their lease.

To learn more visit, http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com.

Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684

Other Practice Areas offered by the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan:

  • Business litigation
  • Employment law
  • Oil and gas law
  • Patent, trademark and copyright litigation
  • Real estate and construction litigation
  • [mappress mapid="39"]

    • Texas appeals court rules on consent provision in oil lease case
      A Texas appeals court eliminated a $27.7 million judgment against an oil and gas company in a dispute over a drilling farmout agreement, ruling that the contract permitted the company to withhold consent to an assignment of the agreement. Carrizo Oil & Gas Inc. had appealed a jury verdict finding it liable for fraud, breach [...]
    • Texas telecommunications company sues Comcast claiming tortious interference
      A small Texas telecommunications company has filed a lawsuit against cable giant Comcast, alleging tortious interference with contract. In the lawsuit, Anthony Luna claims Comcast dug up and destroyed cables owned by his company, Telecom Cable. Luna alleges that Comcast workers cut cables and disrupted service to his customers in the Houston area. The complaint [...]
    • Texas appellate court rules against owner of royalty interest in fraudulent inducement lawsuit
      A Texas appellate court held that the owner of a royalty interest could not claim fraudulent inducement with regard to its settlement with a Shell Oil affiliate that operated the oil and gas property. In 2014, a Texas state court jury found that the Syrian American Oil Corp. (Samoco) was fraudulently induced into entering a [...]

    See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,

    Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

    * indicates required