Elders May be Given More Colonoscopies Than Needed, Agrees Elder Law Attorney
Bloomfield Hills, MI (Law Firm Newswire) June 20, 2013 – Too many seniors are being given colonoscopies too often, a new study states.
A recent study in the American Medical Association’s JAMA Internal Medicine stated that many seniors report “a strong moral obligation” when it comes to undergoing medical testing, even in their advanced years. But many medical professionals are advising them that the risks that come with screenings such as colonoscopies and other medical procedures may not be worth it.
Though all Americans are urged by multiple advocacy groups to begin colorectal cancer screening at age 50, little public awareness exists of when someone may wish to stop screening for cancer and some other diseases. In 2008, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force surveyed multiple years of research, and determined that routine screening for colorectal cancer after age 75 was unnecessary, and any screening was unnecessary in individuals over the age of 85.
“Screening for individuals over the age of 50 is common sense,” agrees Michigan elder law attorney Christopher Berry. “But there may be an age cap after which it simply is not necessary.”
Routine screening for the group most at risk is the best way to catch any issues early, say advocates. But though colonoscopies are not used often enough to catch colorectal cancers in those over 50, critics say they are being used as a screening tool on too many elderly patients.
In 2011, a study was overseen by geriatrician Dr. James Goodwin at the University of Texas Medical Branch. His study looked at a sample of Medicare beneficiaries from across the U.S. and researchers determined that seniors were typically given colonoscopies more often than generally recommended by medical guidelines.
A repeat test is suggested 10 years after a first negative colonoscopy, but the study showed that almost 50 percent of patients who had negative colonoscopies were given another within three-to-five years. Twenty-five percent of them were recommended when there had been no notable medical indication of potential concern.
Looking at 2008 – 2009 Medicare data for Texas-based patients above the age of 70 who underwent a screening colonoscopy, researchers found that 23 percent of the tests were “potentially inappropriate,” or performed with no overt medical issues or too soon after the last one.
Though screening can catch many issues, Goodwin agrees, colon cancer is such a slow-growing disease that for the very elderly, if it has not developed by a certain age, it likely will not be the disease to be concerned about. And with colonoscopies, even the prep can come with a certain amount of discomfort for older patients.
Learn more at http://www.michiganelderlawattorney.com/
The Elder Care Firm of Christopher J. Berry
2550 S Telegraph Rd.
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302
Toll free: 855-41-Elder (855-413-5337)
- Massive Changes to Medicaid Planning in Michigan For Married Couples using Sole Benefit Trusts
Today, the Department of Human Services made huge sweeping, unforeseen changes to Medicaid planning for Michigan married couples with their change in analysis of the Sole Benefit Trust and how it fits into the asset calculation. According to a communication from Terrence M. Beurer, Director, Field Operations Administration, all SBO Trust assets are deemed countable […]
- Philip Seymour Hoffman Leaves his Children Zilch…$35Million to his Partner
Phillip Seymour Hoffman died at the young age of 46, with three children, all under the age of 11. With his estimated $35 million fortune in his estate, he made the bold decision to disinherit his children, leaving the bulk of his $35 million to his partner, Mimi O’Donnell, according to an article on Today.com. […]
- Is your Michigan Caregiver for Your Senior a Felon?
According to a disturbing article in the Daily Reporter, convicted felons are being paid to take care of our Michigan seniors, according to a staffer at the Area Agency on Aging. Melissa Franklin of the Area Agency on Aging states, “We have multiple care providers now who are on the sex offender registry. There is […]
- BIG NEWS: Supreme Court Holds Inherited IRAs are Not Protected Anymore
In the big news department, the Supreme Court held in Clark v. Rameker that inherited IRA’s are not asset protected. There were differing opinions on whether an inherited IRA would be protected against bankruptcy, however it is now clear that they are not. Here’s the facts, at death Ms. Heffrom owned an IRA worth about […]