Health Insurance Companies May Find Themselves Policing Doctors and Hospitals
Cleveland, OH (Law Firm Newswire) June 13, 2013 – Nevada’s courts ruled health insurance companies must monitor the practices of health care professional members.
“Nevada just handed down a ruling with the potential for an octopus-like reach —- a $24 million jury verdict in a hepatitis C outbreak case that indicated health insurance companies are required to watch over the practices of their members,” stated Christopher Mellino, a Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer. “It’s well worth reading: Helen Meyer v. Health Plan of Nevada Inc, Eighth Judicial District Court (Clark County), No. 09A583799; and Bonnie Brunson v. Health Plan of Nevada Inc, Eighth Judicial District Court (Clark County), No. A-10-608344-C.”
Evidently the court found medical professionals related to UnitedHealth Group Inc., accountable for infecting two individuals with liver destroying Hepatitis C. The plaintiffs alleged they were infected due to their doctor using unsafe injection practices during an endoscopy. There were three plaintiffs in the suit, with one being the wife of one of the affected plaintiffs.
“What is unusual about this case is that in medical negligence cases, plaintiffs may only obtain damages from a hospital, doctor or both. In this lawsuit, the argument was made that the UnitedHealth Group should be held accountable, because the doctor was a member of their network and they should have known about his questionable and unsafe practices,” Mellino explained.
If this presumption of liability is upheld on appeal, and brought into play across the nation, it would be a major change for insurance companies. They would find themselves having to police their network physicians, which would likely translate into further restricting what doctor members of the network may do, or raise their malpractice premiums further.
“Even though this particular case was decided based on Nevada’s tort law, other states may take Nevada’s lead and force insurance companies to become Big Brother overseeing member doctors. This would actually bode well for potential victims of medical malpractice, as it would offer them protection in the form of a third party making sure the doctor is doing their job the right way. Given that most medical malpractice victims routinely get the short end of the stick with capped damages, this may be a welcome addition to their arsenal of protection,” suggested Mellino.
Based on evidence that may have been withheld at trial, it appears the doctor may have been a one-off exception in that he hid his actions from everyone, including other health agencies and the federal government. Whether that is the case and that information does come out on appeal, the can of worms that represents medical malpractice accountability and justice for innocent victims has been opened.
Plaintiffs in this case are seeking punitive damages for over $1 million. Since any award would be capped, it may ultimately come out at $240 million. The clock is ticking. If the case is upheld, patient care may take on a new dimension, with insurance companies watching over the physician’s shoulder.
Mellino Robenalt LLC
200 Public Sq., Suite 2900
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Call: (216) 241-1901
- Medicare’s Somewhat Faulty Attempt at Preventing Medical Malpractice
Back in 2012, Kaiser Health News reported that Medicare would begin rewarding hospitals that provided quality care to patients and reducing payments to those that didn’t. “The Medicare program wants to ensure that the services they pay for are of high quality,” apta.org stated. As a result, Cleveland Clinic and 1,556 others were slated to receive bonuses, according to Kaiser’s December 20 article. Conversely, more than 2,200 hospitals were penalized because too many patients wound up readmitted within 30 days. “The way the program works is that Medicare is reducing payments to all hospitals by 1 percent, estimated at $964 […]
- Were You Overcharged for Your Surgery? Attorney Tom Robenalt Invites Your Medical Billing Questions
When recovering from surgery, the last thing you need is a surprise medical bill, but that’s what’s happening to many people. One spinal fusion patient told nytimes.com that his hospital charged him $56,000, his anesthesiologist charged him $4,300, and his orthopedist charged him $133,000. He was also billed $2,470 and $3,990 for two surgical screws. “He was blindsided, though, by a bill of about $117,000 from an ‘assistant surgeon’ [that he] did not recall meeting,” the September 20, 2014, article stated. Reasons behind unexpected fees are manyfold. First, the insurance company isn’t present in the OR, so it doesn’t know […]
- Ohio Woman Awarded $1.2 Million in Perforated Bowel Lawsuit
A Hamilton County resident and her husband have been awarded a total of $1.2 million in a medical malpractice lawsuit that could have been avoided if her doctor had diagnosed and treated her perforated bowel sooner, per Cincinnati.com September 11, 2014. In 2009, the woman sought treatment for stomach pain. After undergoing two partial hysterectomies, her pain persisted. According to her medical malpractice attorney, her doctor neglected to order a CT scan until she was critically ill with acute respiratory distress syndrome. She now has 80 percent lung capacity and walks with a walker. A Perforated Bowel Can Cause Septic […]