Health Insurance Companies May Find Themselves Policing Doctors and Hospitals
Cleveland, OH (Law Firm Newswire) June 13, 2013 - Nevada’s courts ruled health insurance companies must monitor the practices of health care professional members.
“Nevada just handed down a ruling with the potential for an octopus-like reach ---- a $24 million jury verdict in a hepatitis C outbreak case that indicated health insurance companies are required to watch over the practices of their members,” stated Christopher Mellino, a Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer. “It’s well worth reading: Helen Meyer v. Health Plan of Nevada Inc, Eighth Judicial District Court (Clark County), No. 09A583799; and Bonnie Brunson v. Health Plan of Nevada Inc, Eighth Judicial District Court (Clark County), No. A-10-608344-C.”
Evidently the court found medical professionals related to UnitedHealth Group Inc., accountable for infecting two individuals with liver destroying Hepatitis C. The plaintiffs alleged they were infected due to their doctor using unsafe injection practices during an endoscopy. There were three plaintiffs in the suit, with one being the wife of one of the affected plaintiffs.
“What is unusual about this case is that in medical negligence cases, plaintiffs may only obtain damages from a hospital, doctor or both. In this lawsuit, the argument was made that the UnitedHealth Group should be held accountable, because the doctor was a member of their network and they should have known about his questionable and unsafe practices,” Mellino explained.
If this presumption of liability is upheld on appeal, and brought into play across the nation, it would be a major change for insurance companies. They would find themselves having to police their network physicians, which would likely translate into further restricting what doctor members of the network may do, or raise their malpractice premiums further.
“Even though this particular case was decided based on Nevada’s tort law, other states may take Nevada’s lead and force insurance companies to become Big Brother overseeing member doctors. This would actually bode well for potential victims of medical malpractice, as it would offer them protection in the form of a third party making sure the doctor is doing their job the right way. Given that most medical malpractice victims routinely get the short end of the stick with capped damages, this may be a welcome addition to their arsenal of protection,” suggested Mellino.
Based on evidence that may have been withheld at trial, it appears the doctor may have been a one-off exception in that he hid his actions from everyone, including other health agencies and the federal government. Whether that is the case and that information does come out on appeal, the can of worms that represents medical malpractice accountability and justice for innocent victims has been opened.
Plaintiffs in this case are seeking punitive damages for over $1 million. Since any award would be capped, it may ultimately come out at $240 million. The clock is ticking. If the case is upheld, patient care may take on a new dimension, with insurance companies watching over the physician’s shoulder.
Mellino Robenalt LLC
200 Public Sq., Suite 2900
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Call: (216) 241-1901
- What Is the Difference Between a Coma and Brain Death?
When someone suffers traumatic brain injury, coma and brain death are two possible outcomes. Although coma sometimes progresses to brain death, the two injured states are distinct and characterized by very different symptoms. Coma and Vegetative State Coma is a state of deep unconsciousness that lasts for an indeterminate length of time. While in this state, the brain continues to emit electrical impulse signals to the rest of the body, but it is working at the lowest possible level. A vegetative state is a coma from which the patient has recovered brain stem function but not higher cognitive abilities. Such […]
- Study Analyzes Use of Simvastatin and Environmental Enrichment on TBI Patients
A recent study published in the medical journal Brain Injury explored the use of Simvastatin and environmental enrichment on brain injury patients and the outcomes of each treatment. The target group of the study was patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injuries that affected their temporal order memory and spontaneous object recognition. Researchers used male Wistar rats in the study, and compared the therapeutic effects of both Simvastatin and environmental enrichment to see whether they improved memory and recognition and, if so, by how much. Here’s how they conducted the study: The rats arrived at the research facility. Seven […]
- Study Assesses Using Vyvanse to Treat Brain Injured People with ADHD
Attention deficit disorder is one of the most common and debilitating results of traumatic brain injuries. A recent study published in the journal Brain Injury looked at the effectiveness of Vyvanse in terms of treating attention deficit disorder caused by moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries. This is the first study of its kind among traumatic brain injury patients, being unique in that no other study has examined how stimulant medications can affect this disorder, rather than the typical methylphenidate. The study was conducted over 12 weeks and utilized a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind test with cross-over. Twenty-two patients were […]