» Speed Limits in School Zones May be Toughened

Speed Limits in School Zones May be Toughened

Chicago, IL (Law Firm Newswire) June 17, 2013 – A bill approved in the Illinois House would toughen speed limits in school zones.

Under the proposed legislation, drivers would be required to slow down to 20 mph any time a child is present in a school zone, not only when school is in session. Current law requires drivers to slow down in a school zone only on school days between 7 a.m. and 4 p.m. Rep. Elaine Nekritz, D-Northbrook, said that children should be protected when crossing the street after school hours. Researchers have found that this time period is when children are most often struck by automobiles.

“Children on foot are at great risk of being struck by an automobile, and safety measures are needed to protect them,” said Paul Greenberg, a Chicago car accident attorney.

The new bill would require drivers to slow down to 20 mph in a school zone whenever a child is within 50 feet of the street. Violations would result in a $150 fine for the first offense; a second offense would bring a fine of at least $300.

The bill’s supporters pointed out that the proposed legislation is based on data indicating that most car accidents involving children on foot occur after school hours. Opponents of the bill said it was aimed at collecting fines from drivers in Chicago, where population density results in more school zones within a given area. Rep. Monique Davis, D-Chicago said that she believed the bill was well-intentioned, but that in her district, which includes the Far South Side of Chicago, there are “schools everywhere you turn.” Davis said she suspected the bill was aimed at making money from people working in the city.

According to a Chicago Tribune analysis of data from the Chicago Police Department and the Illinois Department of Transportation, the greatest number of accidents in which school-age children were hit by cars occurred in the hours between 3 p.m. and 8 p.m. From 2007 through 2011, in the hour starting at 3 p.m, there were 460 such accidents; 4 p.m., 384 accidents; 5 p.m., 408 accidents; 6 p.m., 399 accidents; and 7 p.m., 285 accidents.

To learn more about a Chicago personal injury lawyer and Chicago personal injury attorney, Paul Greenberg, visit http://www.briskmanandbriskman.com or call 877-595-HURT (4878).

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg
351 West Hubbard Street, Ste 810
Chicago, IL 60654
Phone: 312.222.0010
Facebook: Like Us!
Google Places: Contact a Chicago personal injury lawyer from Briskman Briskman & Greenberg on Google Places!To learn more, contact a Chicago personal injury attorney or Chicago car accident lawyer at Briskman, Briskman & Greenberg by calling 312.222.0010 or visiting http://www.briskmanandbriskman.com.



  • Mother of girl hit by bus sues Chicago Transit Authority
    The mother of a child who was struck and killed by a city bus on Memorial Day has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the Chicago Transit Authority. The lawsuit was filed in Cook County Circuit Court by La’Tasha Upshaw. Her daughter was 19 months old when she died. The lawsuit alleges that the driver [...]
  • How brain injuries occur during birth
    Injuries to a baby’s brain can occur during or shortly after labor and delivery, as a result of three main categories of cause: reduced oxygen, reduced glucose and trauma. A baby in the womb gets its oxygen from its mother, as the mother’s oxygenated blood flows across the placenta and through the umbilical cord. If [...]
  • Research suggests under-reported birth injury
    Research suggests that Chiari malformation may be an under-reported birth injury. Chiari malformations are structural problems in the cerebellum, the area of the brain that maintains balance. The cerebellum normally sits above the foramen magnum with parts of the brain stem. The foramen magnum is in the lower back portion of the skull and leads [...]
  • Appellate court rules: employer must pay medical expenses in workers’ compensation case
    The Appellate Court of Illinois recently decided an important workers’ compensation case. The court denied an employer’s request for a rehearing in a case concerning the issue of whether the company’s intent was to stipulate to payment of certain rates for the medical treatment expenses of an employee.  The court upheld the award of benefits [...]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required