» Selling Life Insurance Policies To Third Parties A Growing Concern

Selling Life Insurance Policies To Third Parties A Growing Concern

Bloomfield Hills, MI (Law Firm Newswire) July 1, 2013 – Some life insurance policyholders are selling their policies to fund long-term care, but at what ultimate cost?

Bills in numerous states, including California, Florida, New York, Kentucky, Maine, Louisiana and New Jersey, are allowing elderly residents to sell their life insurance policies to pay for custodial health care.

“For anyone concerned about their long-term care, selling off their life insurance is not their only option,” commented Michigan elder law attorney Christopher J. Berry. “Long-term care insurance is designed specifically to ensure that no one needs to borrow from the future, or their children’s inheritance, to be safe and cared for in their later years.”

While state lawmakers backing the bills believe financing long-term care with life insurance policies might save the Medicaid system money, elder care advocates are concerned that this is just another way seniors are being convinced to pay out of their own pocket when a system is in place to help them.

The bills are part of a new push toward “life settlements;” a life insurance policyholder can cash in their policy at a discount, and the new buyer makes their premiums and then later collects their death benefit.

“What policyholders do not usually take into consideration,” said Berry, “is that the third-party buyer typically takes a huge chunk of value from the policy – as much as 45 percent, in some cases.”

In Texas, Gov. Rick Perry has signed a new law which allows Texas Medicaid officials the right to inform individuals who are applying for Medicaid assistance that they are allowed to sell their life-insurance policies to fund their long-term care. Opting to do so will not negate their eligibility for Medicaid later, when those funds run out.

If any individual chooses to sell their insurance policy to a third party, the fund typically must be placed in an irrevocable bank account so that the funds will solely be used to meet long-term care bills. While life insurance owners were not previously prohibited from selling their policies, the new laws are designed to both regulate and publicize the practice. Most policy holders are above the poverty level and not yet eligible for Medicaid, but do not have the funds in place to pay for needed long-term care.

Medicaid is a health program run jointly by each state with federal oversight for individuals below a standard poverty level, typically with less than $2,000 in assets.

Learn more at http://www.michiganelderlawattorney.com/

The Elder Care Firm of Christopher J. Berry
2550 S Telegraph Rd.
Ste 255
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302
Local: 248.481.4000
Toll free: 855-41-Elder (855-413-5337)

  • Massive Changes to Medicaid Planning in Michigan For Married Couples using Sole Benefit Trusts
    Today, the Department of Human Services made huge sweeping, unforeseen changes to Medicaid planning for Michigan married couples with their change in analysis of the Sole Benefit Trust and how it fits into the asset calculation. According to a communication from Terrence M. Beurer, Director, Field Operations Administration, all SBO Trust assets are deemed countable […]
  • Philip Seymour Hoffman Leaves his Children Zilch…$35Million to his Partner
    Phillip Seymour Hoffman died at the young age of 46, with three children, all under the age of 11.  With his estimated $35 million fortune in his estate, he made the bold decision to disinherit his children, leaving the bulk of his $35 million to his partner, Mimi O’Donnell, according to an article on Today.com. […]
  • Is your Michigan Caregiver for Your Senior a Felon?
    According to a disturbing article in the Daily Reporter, convicted felons are being paid to take care of our Michigan seniors, according to a staffer at the Area Agency on Aging. Melissa Franklin of the Area Agency on Aging states, “We have multiple care providers now who are on the sex offender registry.  There is […]
  • BIG NEWS: Supreme Court Holds Inherited IRAs are Not Protected Anymore
    In the big news department, the Supreme Court held in Clark v. Rameker that inherited IRA’s are not asset protected.  There were differing opinions on whether an inherited IRA would be protected against bankruptcy, however it is now clear that they are not. Here’s the facts, at death Ms. Heffrom owned an IRA worth about […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,

Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required