Family Law Attorney Lisa McDevitt Offers Observations On Virginia Gay Marriage Lawsuit
Fairfax, VA (Law Firm Newswire) September 16, 2013 – A gay Virginia couple has filed a federal lawsuit against state officials because they were denied a marriage license.
Timothy Bostic and Tony London filed the lawsuit July 18, claiming that they were denied a marriage license on July 1, just days after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act. Although the Supreme Court’s ruling did not overrule Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage, legal experts said it provides an opening to challenge it.
“Same-sex marriage is not legal in Virginia, and the Supreme Court’s ruling did not change that,” said Lisa McDevitt, a family law attorney not involved in the case. “However, plaintiffs can now argue that the state is denying them access to federal benefits that they would have if they were married.”
According to the lawsuit, Bostic, a professor at Old Dominion University, and London, a Norfolk real estate agent, have been in a committed relationship since 1989. They claim they were denied a marriage license at the Circuit Court in Norfolk due to Virginia’s 2006 constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.
On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Section 3 of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, holding that restricting the federal definition of marriage to heterosexual unions was unconstitutional. The court left Section 4 of the Act in place, which allows states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriage.
Bostic and London’s lawsuit asks the court to enjoin enforcement of statutes excluding gays and lesbians from marriage, arguing that by prohibiting same-sex marriage, Virginia deprives couples of numerous benefits that are available to married people, such as Social Security and Medicaid benefits and favorable treatment under state and federal law with regard to income and estate taxes.
The lawsuit cites the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision on the Defense of Marriage Act and its 1967 ruling in Loving v. Virginia, which allowed for mixed-race couples to marry. “Marriage is one of the ‘basic civil rights of man,’” Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote in that decision, “fundamental to our very existence and survival.”
Lisa Lane McDevitt
2155 Bonaventure Drive
Vienna, VA 22181
Toll Free: 866-602-7850
- Women Have Usually Trumped Men in Child Custody, But More Men May Win custody Cases
In divorce cases, child custody and child support (its possible financial corollary) have, traditionally, been skewed heavily in the mother’s favor. But changing legal doctrines, social mores and economic factors have been changing the balance. Statistics from recent decades show that women were consistently awarded custody of children from 1993 through 2007 — 83 percent [...]
- Watching for deception: Bitcoin may be used to conceal assets in divorce
Increasingly, divorcing spouses who wish to conceal their assets are turning to electronic currencies like Bitcoin. Bitcoin is the most popular of a host of computer-generated currencies that are used to buy all manner of goods and services. It rivals cash in terms of its anonymity and surpasses it in its ease of transfer and [...]
- Extra estate planning support may be necessary for those with dementia
Disabilities that sometimes develop with age can inhibit long-term planning skills. If you deal with such a condition, you may need to adjust your plans for the future so that they can support you and adhere to your wishes under any circumstance. The best advice is simply to start early. If Alzheimer’s or another form [...]
- When estate planning involves minor children, a testamentary trust may be the best option
One of the advantages of a living trust is that the assets held within it are not subject to probate, which can be a complicated, drawn-out and costly process. As such, many people automatically choose living trusts as they plan their estates. But there is another type of trust: a testamentary trust. While probate is [...]
- Good estate planning depends on good communication with loved ones
Because estate planning involves preparation for the disposition of assets after death, people often feel uncomfortable discussing it. It can be especially challenging for people to face planning with their children. But serious challenges can arise from a lack of communication between estate grantors and their children (their most likely beneficiaries and executors) before death [...]
- When Mediation Is Not the Best Way to Resolve a Divorce
Divorce proceedings can be expensive as well as time-consuming and emotionally draining on the main parties involved. An array of issues, including the division of property, child custody, alimony and other items of contention can prove to be the catalyst for a contentious, drawn-out affair in court. Mediation is often suggested as a viable alternative [...]