» Patent Attorney With Brooks Acordia Explains Importance Of Provisional Patent Applications

Patent Attorney With Brooks Acordia Explains Importance Of Provisional Patent Applications

Los Angeles, CA (Law Firm Newswire) October 21, 2013 - Under the “first-inventor-to-file” patent system created by the America Invents Act (AIA) of 2011, an increasing number of inventors are encouraged to file provisional patent applications.

A local intellectual property attorney says that because filing a provisional application secures a priority date with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the process is likely to be employed far more than it was under the nation's former—pre-AIA “first to invent” patent system.

“Provisional applications are more important than ever under the “first to file” regime of the America Invents Act,” said Los Angeles patent attorney Pejman “PJ” Yedidsion. “We encourage all our clients to file provisional applications early, and often, in the course of development of their inventions.”

A provisional patent application is an inexpensive way to begin the patent process. The fee due the USPTO for small entities (individuals and companies with 500 or fewer employees) is currently $130, and the fee for micro entities (available under the AIA) is just $65. Small entities not named on more than four previous patent applications and not exceeding three times the national median household income may qualify as micro entities.

It is important to note that the word “provisional” describes the application, not the patent – there is no such thing as a “provisional patent.”

Provisional applications do not require a formal patent claim, formal drawings, or an information disclosure statement (prior art statement). For this reason, they are relatively easy to prepare, and associated legal fees are affordable. As soon as a provisional patent application has been filed, the inventor may apply a “patent pending” claim to their invention and/or products.

“The first provisional application should be filed as early as possible – that is, as soon as the invention can be clearly described,” Yedidsion went on. “Inventors need not worry that the invention will inevitably change in nature as the process continues. Subsequent provisional applications should be filed whenever the invention changes in any significant way.”

A provisional application provides a 12-month benefit of priority to non-provisional applications and foreign-filed applications – for example, PCT applications. A corresponding non-provisional application must be filed during that period in order to benefit from the earlier filing date of the provisional application, otherwise the provisional application becomes abandoned. Filing subsequent provisional applications will not extend the 12-month period.

Yedidsion added that another way in which the AIA encourages provisional applications is by weakening the one-year grace period protecting patentability. Prior to the AIA, inventors had a one-year grace period in which to file an application after their invention was publicly disclosed by themselves or a third party. Now, that grace period only protects disclosures made by the inventor or derived from the inventor.

“The disclosures of a third party can destroy the patentability of your invention under AIA,” Yedidsion said. “Accordingly, it is a good idea to file a provisional application as soon as you can describe your invention in concrete terms.”

Brooks Acordia IP Law, P.C.
1445 E. Los Angeles Ave. #108
Simi Valley, CA 93065-2827
Phone: (805) 579-2500
Fax: (805) 584-6427




  • More Guidance on What Software IS and IS NOT Patentable
    In a recent holding of Finjan Holdings, Inc., the Federal Circuit cited to another decision saying that they had previously concluded virus scanning is well-known, an abstract idea, and not patentable.  However, after further review, the Finjan patent  appeared to be claiming a method of operating differently than traditional virus scans that tagged as being previously-identified viruses.  In doing so, the Federal Circuit characterized the Finjan family of patents as using a “behavior-based” approach as compared to a “code-matching” approach of ...
  • Right to Use and Resell Patented Products
    The U.S. Supreme Court in a recent ruling has opined on the rights of a purchaser to use and resell patented products.<br />
    The patent system give the patent owner the right to exclude others from making, using, and selling the patented invention, for the life of the patent. The right to exclude, however, is subject to the rule of patent exhaustion – upon the sale of a patented product, the patent owner’s patent rights are exhausted and the buyer is ...
  • Trademark Cancellation Proceedings
    The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides administrative procedures for contesting the validity of a trademark registration through a procedure known as cancellation proceeding via a “Petition to Cancel” an already registered mark. This procedure is useful to eliminate an interfering trademark registration or to weaken an opponent’s threatening litigation. It is also useful to cancel a mark that perhaps should not have been obtained and is now being cited against your pending application. The cancellation proceeding is essentially a micro-lawsuit within the USPTO and ...

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,

Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required