House Committee Opens Hearings On Inefficiencies In SSA Disability Program
Tampa, FL (Law Firm Newswire) December 27, 2013 - The United States House Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and Entitlements has opened hearings with testimony on the SSA’s struggles with its disability program.
A subcommittee of the House Oversight and Oversight Reform Committee launched hearings November 19 on the Social Security Administration. The Republican-controlled body headlined its mission on the committee website as one of overseeing the SSA’s “mismanagement of federal disability programs.”
The SSA officials who offered opening statements did acknowledge some of their agency’s ongoing problems. Inspector General Patrick P. O’Carroll Jr. shed some light on the reasons that he believes the SSA has been bedeviled by backlogs and lost savings for disability claims.
He stressed in his testimony to the House Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and Entitlements that an increasing number of claims has left the SSA overwhelmed and struggling to process disability claims in a timely manner. This, he maintained, left the agency vulnerable to fraud and abuse.
According to O’Carroll, the number and completion rate of two of the SSA’s most effective means for identifying and eliminating cases of fraud — continuing full medical disability reviews and Supplemental Security Income re-determinations — were not keeping pace with the number of disability claims filed. And O’Carroll provided some figures on CDRs and re-determinations that put the agency’s challenges in perspective, including the following:
* A March 2010 report found that the SSA’s completed CDRs declined by 65 percent from fiscal year 2004 to 2008. Had the CDRs been completed when due, the SSA would have avoided paying at least $556 million during calendar year 2011.
* In a September 2013 review, the SSA found that it had not been able to complete 201,000 high-error profile re-determinations in fiscal year 2011. Had those re-determinations been completed, the SSA would have avoided making at least $228.5 million in additional improper payments.
The inspector general suggested that insufficient funding was a major reason that the SSA has not been able to meet many of its goals on disability claims. He detailed in numerically stark terms the mounting backlog of review work — such as CDRs — the agency has yet to process.
“SSA’s goal based on its FY2013 budget request was to conduct 650,000 full medical CDRs, but given the actual funding it received, the agency has reported that it conducted 428,568,” O’Carroll said. “SSA expected a backlog of 1.3 million full medical CDRs to remain at the end of FY2013. This is an increase over the FY2012 year-end backlog of 1.2 million.”
David W. Magann, P.A.
156 W. Robertson St.
Brandon, FL 33511
Call: (813) 657-9175
4012 Gunn Highway #165
Tampa, Florida 33618
View Larger Map
- NEW IMPAIRMENT LISTING IN FULL EFFECT & APPLICABLE TO ALL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IMMEDIATELY
NEW MENTAL LISTINGS Effective: January 17, 2017 After a revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), and thousands of public comments later, the Social Security Administration (SSA) has published significant revisions to its mental impairment listings. SSA had issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making in August 2010, proposing what at the time appeared to be […]
- SSA is Heading For Delays Again After Recent Cutbacks & Years of Improvement
Service Cuts, Computer Problems Cloud Social Security’s 79th Birthday: The Social Security Administration should have reason to celebrate. After all, August 14, 2014, marked the 79th anniversary of the day when President Franklin Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act, which ushered in the landmark entitlement program. However, the agency’s birthday was a less than cheerful […]
- SSA is Ramping Up Disability Reviews in 2014
The Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984 (“DBRA 1984”) was passed by a unanimous, bipartisan vote in the House and Senate (99-0) in September 1984. President Reagan signed the law on October 9, 1984, when it became Pub. L. No. 98-460. One of the main provisions required “medical improvement” before benefits could be terminated where […]
- Never Allow A Non-Attorney to Represent You At Your Social Security Hearing!
You should NOT have a non-attorney clerk at your hearing? This seems obvious, but several Florida law firms and any company identifying themselves as “Experts”, some who are advertising on TV, are sending non-attorney clerks to Social Security Hearings simply because its cheaper for them to do so rather than have an actual attorney appear. How in […]
- Do Not Believe Non-Lawyer Websites Who Post 95% Success Rates!
Continually we see claimants who have had a non-lawyer representative whose company boasts a 95% success rate when in fact it is simply not true. No lawyer website can ethically advertise with success rates in percentages because it is misleading and yes, unethical. Each claim is different and if it is to good to be true, […]