Are Head Injuires Really Being Taken Seriously? The NFL Settlement Indicates They Are Not
Sacramento, CA (Law Firm Newswire) March 3, 2014 - It may be doubtful that the three-quarters of a billion dollar National Football League (NFL) traumatic brain injury settlement offers enough recompense for stricken former players and other league staff.
“Although this particular settlement is being touted as the NFL stepping up to take responsibility, the 4,800 players may not individually receive enough funds to deal with their neurological problems,” indicates Sacramento brain injury lawyer, Deborah Barron. On the surface of the deal, it appears that each player would receive up to $5 million. Such is likely not the case. The U.S. District Judge overseeing the settlement process is indicating the funding could be significantly less than anticipated due to the possibly restrictive rules dealing with who is eligible. The Court is asking for further information before any kind of a deal is approved.
As it stands, the proposed plan, the result of the lawsuit filed in 2012, may have to be reworked to cover close to 20,000 other men for 65 years, as more with head injuries step forward. The current draft of the settlement suggests those suffering from Lou Gehrig’s disease be awarded $5 million, those with dementia receive $3 million and those who have died get $4 million. However, if 20,000 individuals divvied up the settlement pool, their awards would only be $38,000 per player – nowhere nearly enough for them to cope with their medical and mental issues. The judge is questioning whether or not players receiving a qualifying diagnosis (or the families of deceased players) would get paid and how the fund would be sustainable over such a long period of time, given the higher levels of payouts initially indicated.
Even though the League has annual revenues of up to $10 billion, many legal experts suggest the settlement was almost a bargain. Whether or not the forthcoming further information results in the agreement being rewritten is not known, but many suggest the settlement needs to be higher to compensate for those who desperately need the funding to be able to live a marginally normal life, trying to cope with brain trauma.
“Since the main issue here is the negligence of the League in not admitting what they knew to be true about head trauma, it may transpire that the Court suggests higher compensation. This possibility makes this settlement process worth watching. Certainly there has been some movement towards a safer style of game play since the high numbers of player suicides. However, safer play does not completely eliminate traumatic brain injury,” adds Barron.
Barron Law Corporation
1387 Garden Hwy, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95833
Toll Free: 800-LAW 5908
San Francisco Office
1750 Montgomery St., Suite 100
San Francisco, CA 94133
Toll Free: 800-LAW5908
View Larger Map
- SLU MD Graduate Denied Promised Promotion, Dismissed for Reporting Racism at Jefferson Barracks VA
This case bears witness to alleged racism, discrimination, sexual harassment and fraudulent administrative actions that prompted St. Louis University MD graduate, Dr. Jane Doe, to blow the whistle and reveal the full extent of the story. Doe filed a racism/sexual harassment/Veterans Affairs (VA) government fraud complaint with the Missouri U.S. Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC) […]
- Sexual harassment allegations led to resignation of astronomer Geoff Marcy
Apparently, world-renowned astronomer Geoff Marcy has more than just a solid track record for finding exo-planets. He has a documented, but deliberately squelched track record for sexual harassment while working at two universities in California: University of California, Berkeley, and San Francisco State University (SFSU). And while it appears that university officials knew about his […]
- Uber says drivers are independent contractors, drivers say they are employees
More and more employees in California are taking a hard look at the nature of their employment contracts. Are they being denied benefits? Is their employer flaunting the law and not paying them formeal breaks or allowing rest time? Are they wrongly classified as independent contractors when in reality they are employees? An Uber company […]