Even Habitual Offenders Are Entitled to a Solid Criminal Defense
Lakeland, FL (Law Firm Newswire) May 7, 2014 – There are those that feel if a person continually ends up on the wrong side of the law, that they should be thrown in jail and left there. It’s not that cut and dried.
“A recent case, that I am not involved in, caught my attention because the man involved is considered to be a habitual offender in a number of states and has a criminal record featuring several felony convictions for things such as theft, burglary and drugs, assault, resisting arrest and robbery, and a rape case. His arrest record, which dates back to 1974, shows 61-pages detailing offenses in Oregon, Florida, California, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. His latest brush with the law was as a result of a felony bank robbery,” says Thomas Grajek, a Lakeland criminal defense attorney.
In an odd twist, the man entered the bank, not wearing anything over his head, and handed the teller a note. He then left the bank with the cash and voluntarily turned himself in and offered a full statement to police outlining his involvement in the robbery. The bank was full that day, with 30 employees on site. Given the man’s violent past, many were relieved that things had not gotten out-of-hand during the robbery.
The man was assigned a public defender that would not speak to the media, but did indicate the individual was remorseful. She also suggested she was waiting to confirm her client’s prior arrests and/or convictions before determining how to defend the case. The police have indicated the man will be brought before a magistrate and circuit judge. They do not wish to pursue charges in federal court.
Over the course of this man’s criminal career, the police came to know him as a habitual offender, capable of doing just about anything. “However, no matter what an accused’s history may be, they are still entitled to a defense. In this instance, it appears he may have attempted to rob the bank because he was a homeless veteran. Whatever the circumstances are, each individual deserves competent criminal defense counsel. His circumstances may well mitigate any punishment a court may decide to hand down. That’s for an experienced attorney to determine,” says Grajek.
Thomas C. Grajek
206 Easton Drive, Suite 102
Lakeland, FL 33803
View Larger Map
- Arrest made in Polk County "SWAT"ting incident involving "anonymous" calls to police to lure SWAT team to high school.
A Canadian juvenile was arrested in the recent Polk County “swatting” case. “SWATting” is when an individual attempts to lure the SWAT time to respond to a location for a fake threat of some type. Polk County deputies allege the teen anonymously placed hoax calls to law enforcement officials in an effort to lure SWAT teams to respond to Ft. Meade high school over the past four-months. Deputies say the investigation began in September, when an unidentified male called the sheriff’s office and Fort Meade High School and said he was going to “drive to Fort Meade High School in […]
- Just in time for Christmas, Polk Sheriff Grady Judd's prostitution sting results in 61 arrests.
Sheriff Grady Judd will hold a press conference today to announce the results of the latest Polk Prostitution sting from last week. The sting was part of a undercover operation targeting individuals who respond to online advertisements on Backpage.com. The online ads are usually listings for escort or massage services, but once the person responds to the hotel, the undercover deputies try to make an arrest for an illegal activity. These undercover officers can be very aggressive and often do most of the talking. The sheriff was also targeting human trafficking which is a much more serious felony offense. There are some harsh […]
- Medical marijuana amendment fails in Florida, pot still illegal to possess. What defenses do you have to a possession of cannabis case?
Florida’s medical marijuana amendment did not pass yesterday in the election. Even though a majority of the voters voted in favor of passing the medical marijuana amendment, receiving 58% of the vote, it fell 2% shy needed to pass. In 2006, Florida voters decided all constitutional amendments needed a “super majority” to pass (60% instead of 50%). Ironically, that amendment that now requires a super majority, only passed with 57.8% of the vote. Whether or not the issue is placed back on the ballot is unknown at this time. John Morgan of Morgan & Morgan who spearheaded the campaign had previously […]