Chesapeake Energy’s Legal Troubles Worsen
Houston, TX (Law Firm Newswire) July 28, 2014 - An appeals court upheld a judgment against an oil and gas giant that backed out of a deal to buy Texas leaseholds.
Chesapeake Energy lost its appeal of a $121 million judgment in a lawsuit filed by Preston Exploration and two other parties, who said they had finalized a deal to sell over 500 leaseholds to the company. In continuing bad news for Chesapeake, a Texas school district and newspaper filed separate lawsuits against the company, alleging underpayment of royalties.
Houston attorney Richard LaGarde, who is not involved in the lawsuits, gave a rundown of Chesapeake's mounting legal woes.
“The loss on appeal may be the end of a long legal battle for Chesapeake,” LaGarde said. “The three plaintiffs said the company backed out of a done deal after natural gas prices plunged.”
Previously, Chesapeake had persuaded a federal judge in Houston that the contracts for sale had not been finalized before the company called off the deal. But landowners successfully appealed that ruling, and in 2012, won a nine-figure judgment in a new trial. Chesapeake then appealed that ruling on the grounds that Preston Exploration did not have legal title to some $9 million worth of leases. The appeals court rejected the argument, saying Preston had “satisfied all conditions” of the deals.
Just weeks later, two new lawsuits were filed against the company in as many days.
The first came from the Fort Worth school district, which claims that Chesapeake improperly deducted its own expenses from royalties paid to the district.
“The lawsuit says that Chesapeake promised the district cost-free royalties while negotiating the leases, but then started charging for costs,” LaGarde explained.
The second was filed by the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. The newspaper also claims Chesapeake underpaid royalties, alleging improper deduction of expenses on one lease and a failure to pay any royalties on a second.
“It's too early to tell the strength of these new lawsuits, but even without them, Chesapeake is in a lot of trouble,” LaGarde said.
Chesapeake Energy, based in Oklahoma City, is the second-largest natural gas producer in the U.S. It also faces pending lawsuits from the cities of Fort Worth and Arlington, the Arlington school district, and two separate groups of Forth Worth residents.
LaGarde Law Firm, P.C
3000 Weslayan, Ste. 380
Houston, TX 77027
Phone: (713) 993-0660
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE
LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.
Jason M. Welborn - Of Counsel
617 S. Buchanan Street
PO Box 2053
Lafayette, LA 70501
Phone: (337) 443-4100
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE
- Author of Lottery Petition to Meet with Representative of Governor Abbott
Denice Deckard, the author of a petition to restore honesty and fairness to the Texas Lottery Commission, is scheduled to meet with Jared Staples, Policy Advisor to Texas Governor Greg Abbott tomorrow, June 22nd. Ms. Deckard started a petition on Change.org in reaction to the Fun 5’s scandal involving misleading lottery scratch-off tickets that were designed by […]
- Expert Witnesses Designated by Plaintiffs in Fun 5’s Lawsuit
The Plaintiffs in the Fun 5’s lawsuit pending against GTECH (IGT) in Travis County have filed their Plaintiff’s Amended Response to Request for Disclosures. In it, the Plaintiffs indicated that they may call several expert witnesses at the time of trial. The first expert, Ronald Butters, Ph.D., was previously identified by the Plaintiffs months ago. Dr. […]
- Expert Witnesses Designated by GTECH in Fun 5’s Lawsuit
GTECH (IGT) filed its Third Amended Response to Disclosures in which it identified the expert witnesses it intends to use at the time of trial. GTECH intends to present testimony from Laurel Smith Stvan, Ph.D., Chair of the Department of Linguistics at The University of Texas at Arlington. GTECH described her anticipated testimony as follows: “Dr. Stvan will rely upon her […]
- Appellant Brief Filed in Nettles Case in Dallas
Attorneys for Dawn Nettles have filed their Appellant’s Brief in the 5th Court of Appeals in Dallas. The brief asks the court of appeals to overturn the Dallas trial court’s ruling that GTECH has “derivative immunity”. The Dallas trial court’s decision in Ms. Nettles case is directly opposite to the decision reached by the Austin court […]
- GTECH Files Appeal in Fun 5’s Case
GTECH Corporation (IGT) has filed a notice of appeal to the 3rd Court of Appeals in Austin. GTECH is asking the court of appeals to overrule the Austin trial court’s denial of GTECH’s Plea to the Jurisdiction. In its Plea, GTECH claims it is immune from liability for any fraud claims because it is a […]