» Chesapeake Energy’s Legal Troubles Worsen

Chesapeake Energy’s Legal Troubles Worsen

Houston, TX (Law Firm Newswire) July 28, 2014 - An appeals court upheld a judgment against an oil and gas giant that backed out of a deal to buy Texas leaseholds.

Chesapeake Energy lost its appeal of a $121 million judgment in a lawsuit filed by Preston Exploration and two other parties, who said they had finalized a deal to sell over 500 leaseholds to the company. In continuing bad news for Chesapeake, a Texas school district and newspaper filed separate lawsuits against the company, alleging underpayment of royalties.

Houston attorney Richard LaGarde, who is not involved in the lawsuits, gave a rundown of Chesapeake's mounting legal woes.

“The loss on appeal may be the end of a long legal battle for Chesapeake,” LaGarde said. “The three plaintiffs said the company backed out of a done deal after natural gas prices plunged.”

Previously, Chesapeake had persuaded a federal judge in Houston that the contracts for sale had not been finalized before the company called off the deal. But landowners successfully appealed that ruling, and in 2012, won a nine-figure judgment in a new trial. Chesapeake then appealed that ruling on the grounds that Preston Exploration did not have legal title to some $9 million worth of leases. The appeals court rejected the argument, saying Preston had “satisfied all conditions” of the deals.

Just weeks later, two new lawsuits were filed against the company in as many days.

The first came from the Fort Worth school district, which claims that Chesapeake improperly deducted its own expenses from royalties paid to the district.

“The lawsuit says that Chesapeake promised the district cost-free royalties while negotiating the leases, but then started charging for costs,” LaGarde explained.

The second was filed by the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. The newspaper also claims Chesapeake underpaid royalties, alleging improper deduction of expenses on one lease and a failure to pay any royalties on a second.

“It's too early to tell the strength of these new lawsuits, but even without them, Chesapeake is in a lot of trouble,” LaGarde said.

Chesapeake Energy, based in Oklahoma City, is the second-largest natural gas producer in the U.S. It also faces pending lawsuits from the cities of Fort Worth and Arlington, the Arlington school district, and two separate groups of Forth Worth residents.

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C
3000 Weslayan, Ste. 380
Houston, TX 77027
Phone: (713) 993-0660
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.
Jason M. Welborn - Of Counsel
617 S. Buchanan Street
PO Box 2053
Lafayette, LA 70501
Phone: (337) 443-4100
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

facebook twitter google_plus_32

  • Dawn Nettles Files Petition for Review with Texas Supreme Court
    Dawn Nettles has asked the Texas Supreme Court to review the decision of the Dallas Court of Appeals in her lawsuit against GTECH (IGT).  The Dallas Court ruled that GTECH was entitled to immunity from fraud claims brought by Ms. Nettles.  Ms. Nettles alleged that GTECH made a knowing decision to use instructions that represented […]
  • Corpus Christi Caller Times’ Article About Fun 5’s Lawsuit
    The Corpus Christi Caller Times recently ran an article by reporter John Moritz about the Fun 5’s lawsuit and the recent Austin Court of Appeals opinion.  The Caller Times is part of the USA Today network.  To read the article, go to the Caller Times’ website.
  • GTECH Skips Motion for Rehearing in Fun 5’s Case
    GTECH, now known by the trade name IGT, has apparently decided to skip filing a motion for rehearing or a motion for rehearing en banc in the Austin Court of Appeals.  A three-judge panel of that court issued an opinion in the Steele v. GTECH lawsuit on January 11, 2018.  In its opinion, the Austin […]
  • Deadlines to Appeal Austin Court of Appeals’ Decision
    As we noted in our last post, the Austin Court of Appeals issued its long-awaited decision in the Steele v. GTECH  Fun 5’s case on January 11, 2018.  The Austin Court denied GTECH’s request to be given immunity from suit under the  legal doctrine of “derivative sovereign immunity”.  Many lottery players are now wondering what […]
  • Court of Appeals Rules in Favor of Fun 5s Players
    The Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued its long-awaited opinion in the Steele v. GTECH Corporation case today.  The lawsuit was brought by over 1,000 lottery players against GTECH, the operator of the Texas Lottery.  The players contend that GTECH made the knowing decision to print misleading and fraudulent instructions on the Fun 5’s scratch-off […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required