» FDA Now Moves to Reclassify Transvaginal Mesh Kits as High Risk

FDA Now Moves to Reclassify Transvaginal Mesh Kits as High Risk

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) July 14, 2014 – The FDA has announced new regulations pertaining to surgical mesh used in transvaginal surgery to repair pelvic organ prolapse.

“The new regulations are supposed to impose greater levels of scrutiny on such products and mandate that manufacturers submit a pre-market approval application to have their product evaluated. Prior to issuing these new regulations, the transvaginal mesh kit was rated as being a moderate risk device. However, in the face of thousands of lawsuits against various mesh makers, the FDA had to move to do something. Because the mesh was rated as a moderate risk, there was no requirement to conduct human clinical trials before marketing it,” explains Bobby Lee, a personal injury lawyer with Lee, Gober and Reyna in Austin.

The move to reclassify the transvaginal mesh products as high-risk means any further mesh products would not be marketed without trials and that if current mesh makers intend to keep selling their products, they must conduct safety studies. “While this is good news, it is a bit like closing the barn door after the horse has escaped. Testing existing products in light of the thousands of lawsuits for defective surgical mesh would seem to be redundant since it was inappropriately tested in a live, unsuspecting market over the last few years, with disastrous consequences,” points out Lee. “Clearly, settling the large number of lawsuits relating to defective mesh products may take many years.”

Recent court documents indicate there are over 50,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia by women allegedly injured by mesh products.

The lawsuits are:
· In Re Cook Medical, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2440)
· In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support System Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2387)
· In Re C. R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2187)
· In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2326)
· In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation - MDL No. 2327)
· In re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325)

Lee, Gober & Reyna
11940 Jollyville Road #220-S
Austin, Texas 78759
Phone: 512.478.8080

  • ‘The happy song makes me happy,’ were a woman’s last words on Facebook
    Texting while driving is never a good idea. Just seconds before a head-on collision, a woman posted to her Facebook account about how the happy song by Pharrell made her happy. The six words she used to express that sentiment were the last she ever texted. Courtney Sanford hit a recycling truck, after crossing the median. Taking her eyes off the road to text cost Sanford her life. Was it worth the risk, posting to friends and family while she was driving? Her friends and family do not think so. The Facebook message was posted at 8:33 a.m., and one […]
  • Smartphones still let teens do dumb things behind the wheel
    It is no secret that texting while driving increases the risk of getting into a serious accident more than 20-fold. That statistic suggests it is far more dangerous that driving while impaired (DWI). Teens tend to be enthusiastic texters and also do not have the same driving experience as older adults, something that can spell disaster on its own. Inexperience increases the chances of the worst kind of crash. And even relatively experienced teen drivers may be more likely than adults to make the poor decision to text while driving, increasing their chances of getting into a serious accident. In […]
  • Seibert Clarification from the U.S. Supreme Court Regarding Miranda Rights
    Anyone who has seen a cop show knows about the now famous 1966 Miranda case where the US Supreme Court imposed procedures designed to protect people from being coerced into giving a confession to the police while the person is being interrogated in police custody. The police, not wanting to be hindered by the requirement to provide Miranda warnings developed a two-step “question-first warn later” technique wherein the police interrogate a suspect without providing Miranda warnings, get the suspect to fully confess, then give the suspect the Miranda warnings and get the suspect to re-confess. The effect of this technique […]
  • Texting distracts movement even when not on wheels
    Distracted driving isn’t the only transportation danger posed by texting, as distracted walking can result in harm as well. Some media reports indicate a rise in texting while biking even. What people don’t seem to realize is that walking with eyes on one’s phone and not on their surroundings can get them seriously injured or killed. We’re all familiar with the woman who went viral in a video after she walked and fell into a fountain in the middle of a mall while texting. Such stories are in the media everyday: people walking into moving traffic, fountains, walls, creeks, lakes, […]
  • Cop pulls over distracted driver, only to get hit by another texting driver
    In a tale almost too bizarre to comprehend, an Oregon motorcycle police officer pulled over a driver for texting while driving on the Interstate, when a van ran into him from behind and ejected him from his motorcycle. The 55-year-old van driver wasn’t paying attention to where he was going because he was using his cellphone. The 41-year-old trooper was taken to the nearest medical center for treatment and listed in stable condition. This is the ultimate graphic example of the dangers of distracted driving, and highlights the difficulties of enforcing such a law at the grassroots law enforcement level. […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required