Schneider Logistics and Walmart Slapped with Lawsuit for Failure to Pay Overtime
Sacramento, CA (Law Firm Newswire) August 22, 2014 - California law dictates all workers must be paid for overtime, but employers are frequently ignoring the mandate.
“We’re seeing an increase in unpaid overtime and wage lawsuits,” reported Sacramento business attorney, Deborah Barron. “Companies in the unethical habit of violating the laws are not paying workers either overtime or their regular salary.”
Interestingly enough, bigger companies seem to flout the law most often. A recent case between Walmart and Schneider Logistics ultimately ended in a $21 million settlement.
The suit was launched in 2011, and it represented over 1,800 workers at various Schneider facilities. One of the allegations stated that the company did not pay its workers for all hours worked. “Plaintiffs indicated they often logged 16-hour days every day of the week. Allegedly, they were not allowed mandatory breaks, not paid overtime and did not even receive minimum wage,” Barron added.
Schneider’s is paying the whole of the settlement, according to an article in the Los Angeles Times. Although Walmart was not, at first, a named defendant, it was added later, with a judge finding that they could be liable as a co-employer due to their significant control over warehouse operations. Walmart objected to that suggestion. “Which is no real surprise,” commented Barron. “Whether they used a third-party or not to handle warehouse operations, the key point is their level of involvement in directing what went on at the Schneider warehouse.”
A second, similar case involving Schneider Logistics is also interesting to observe. In Franklin Quezada v. Schenider Logistics Transloading and Distribution at the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, it came to light that approximately 560 Schneider workers alleged their wages were illegally docked and that they did not receive overtime pay. The lawsuit settled for $4.7 million and came with a judge’s opinion that said Schneider’s actions were “fundamentally misleading and deceptive.”
The economy remains shaky, but this is no reason to penalize hardworking people who need their wages to take care of their families. “If you find yourself in a situation like either of these two cases, my office is able to assist you in understanding your legal rights,” said Barron.
Barron Law Corporation
1387 Garden Hwy, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95833
Toll Free: 800-LAW 5908
San Francisco Office
1750 Montgomery St., Suite 100
San Francisco, CA 94133
Toll Free: 800-LAW5908
View Larger Map
- A retroactive court ruling on waiving a second meal break may change the legal landscape
Health care employers may face a flood of lawsuits based on a recent court ruling relating to Industrial Wage Commission (IWC) Wage Order 5. Wage Order 5 has been interpreted by employers to mean workers are allowed to waive their right to a second meal break even when they work shifts that are longer than […]
- Harvard Is Clarifying Its Sexual Harassment Policies
Harvard University is one of numerous educational institutions to come under investigation for how its administration handles accusations of sexual harassment and assault. Initially, their existing policy relating to relationships between students and teaching staff stated that professors couldn’t have romantic or sexual relationships with students in their classes. The policy was silent on whether […]
- Does “yes mean yes” in high school?
“Yes means yes” (affirmative, conscious and voluntary consent to sexual activity) is intended to replace the saying “No means no,” but how far does this new maxim extend? Is it only relevant to college students? Is there any clear way to draw a line between consensual sex and rape? These are important questions. Nationally, several […]