» Widow of Shipyard Worker Files Wrongful Death Suit, Citing Asbestos Exposure

Widow of Shipyard Worker Files Wrongful Death Suit, Citing Asbestos Exposure

Houston, TX (Law Firm Newswire) September 4, 2014 - On June 30, Shirley Holmes of Gretna, Louisiana, filed a wrongful death lawsuit after her husband's passing, pointing toward alleged asbestos exposure he suffered years before.

In the 1970's, Kermit Holmes worked at the Avondale shipyard in Louisiana, where he was allegedly exposed to asbestos dust and fibers. In the years that followed, he developed asbestosis and mesothelioma lung cancer. He died in September 2013. 

"His wife blames his death on this exposure, claiming that he was not provided with appropriate safety equipment that could have protected him from the harmful fibers," explained Richard LaGarde, a Louisiana workplace accident and wrongful death attorney not affiliated with the case.

Asbestos was used as insulation and a fire retardant for more than 2,000 years before its dangerous risks were confirmed. In the 1930's, workers began to bring and win lawsuits against employers who had exposed them to the mineral fibers, but the use of the material remained legal (though discouraged by such suits). Some manufacturers continued to expose their employees in spite of the risk, favoring the profitable and simple solutions the material offered in construction.  

Today, the use of asbestos is legally banned in some types of structures. "Protective measures, including disposable clothing covers and company showers, were designed to shield workers from exposure, and they were readily available for use in the 1970's. The dangers of asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma were solidly confirmed by the time Mr. Holmes worked at the Avondale yard," LaGarde noted.

The list of defendants is lengthy: Holmes has named 3M Company, American Employers Insurance Company, ANCO Insulations Inc., Avondale Industries, Avondale Shipyard, Albert Bossier Jr., CBS Corporation, The Dox Chemical Company, Eagle Inc., Foster-Wheeler LLC, Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Maryland Casualty Company and Onebeacon America Insurance Company.

The suit alleges that Holmes' employers should have known of and acted against the health risks their site posed. The case claims that the defendants failed to reveal and concealed critical information, including the risk of working with asbestos. Moreover, they allegedly failed to provide sufficient and necessary protection or proper ventilation. 

Above all, the suit argues, these companies are at fault for Holmes' death because of their reckless, improper handling and storage of the dangerous material. 

The suit seeks an unspecified amount in damages.

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C
3000 Weslayan, Ste. 380
Houston, TX 77027
Phone: (713) 993-0660
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.
Jason M. Welborn - Of Counsel
617 S. Buchanan Street
PO Box 2053
Lafayette, LA 70501
Phone: (337) 443-4100
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

facebook twitter google_plus_32

  • Dawn Nettles Files Petition for Review with Texas Supreme Court
    Dawn Nettles has asked the Texas Supreme Court to review the decision of the Dallas Court of Appeals in her lawsuit against GTECH (IGT).  The Dallas Court ruled that GTECH was entitled to immunity from fraud claims brought by Ms. Nettles.  Ms. Nettles alleged that GTECH made a knowing decision to use instructions that represented […]
  • Corpus Christi Caller Times’ Article About Fun 5’s Lawsuit
    The Corpus Christi Caller Times recently ran an article by reporter John Moritz about the Fun 5’s lawsuit and the recent Austin Court of Appeals opinion.  The Caller Times is part of the USA Today network.  To read the article, go to the Caller Times’ website.
  • GTECH Skips Motion for Rehearing in Fun 5’s Case
    GTECH, now known by the trade name IGT, has apparently decided to skip filing a motion for rehearing or a motion for rehearing en banc in the Austin Court of Appeals.  A three-judge panel of that court issued an opinion in the Steele v. GTECH lawsuit on January 11, 2018.  In its opinion, the Austin […]
  • Deadlines to Appeal Austin Court of Appeals’ Decision
    As we noted in our last post, the Austin Court of Appeals issued its long-awaited decision in the Steele v. GTECH  Fun 5’s case on January 11, 2018.  The Austin Court denied GTECH’s request to be given immunity from suit under the  legal doctrine of “derivative sovereign immunity”.  Many lottery players are now wondering what […]
  • Court of Appeals Rules in Favor of Fun 5s Players
    The Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued its long-awaited opinion in the Steele v. GTECH Corporation case today.  The lawsuit was brought by over 1,000 lottery players against GTECH, the operator of the Texas Lottery.  The players contend that GTECH made the knowing decision to print misleading and fraudulent instructions on the Fun 5’s scratch-off […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required