» Widow of Shipyard Worker Files Wrongful Death Suit, Citing Asbestos Exposure

Widow of Shipyard Worker Files Wrongful Death Suit, Citing Asbestos Exposure

Houston, TX (Law Firm Newswire) September 4, 2014 - On June 30, Shirley Holmes of Gretna, Louisiana, filed a wrongful death lawsuit after her husband's passing, pointing toward alleged asbestos exposure he suffered years before.

In the 1970's, Kermit Holmes worked at the Avondale shipyard in Louisiana, where he was allegedly exposed to asbestos dust and fibers. In the years that followed, he developed asbestosis and mesothelioma lung cancer. He died in September 2013. 

"His wife blames his death on this exposure, claiming that he was not provided with appropriate safety equipment that could have protected him from the harmful fibers," explained Richard LaGarde, a Louisiana workplace accident and wrongful death attorney not affiliated with the case.

Asbestos was used as insulation and a fire retardant for more than 2,000 years before its dangerous risks were confirmed. In the 1930's, workers began to bring and win lawsuits against employers who had exposed them to the mineral fibers, but the use of the material remained legal (though discouraged by such suits). Some manufacturers continued to expose their employees in spite of the risk, favoring the profitable and simple solutions the material offered in construction.  

Today, the use of asbestos is legally banned in some types of structures. "Protective measures, including disposable clothing covers and company showers, were designed to shield workers from exposure, and they were readily available for use in the 1970's. The dangers of asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma were solidly confirmed by the time Mr. Holmes worked at the Avondale yard," LaGarde noted.

The list of defendants is lengthy: Holmes has named 3M Company, American Employers Insurance Company, ANCO Insulations Inc., Avondale Industries, Avondale Shipyard, Albert Bossier Jr., CBS Corporation, The Dox Chemical Company, Eagle Inc., Foster-Wheeler LLC, Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Maryland Casualty Company and Onebeacon America Insurance Company.

The suit alleges that Holmes' employers should have known of and acted against the health risks their site posed. The case claims that the defendants failed to reveal and concealed critical information, including the risk of working with asbestos. Moreover, they allegedly failed to provide sufficient and necessary protection or proper ventilation. 

Above all, the suit argues, these companies are at fault for Holmes' death because of their reckless, improper handling and storage of the dangerous material. 

The suit seeks an unspecified amount in damages.

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C
3000 Weslayan, Ste. 380
Houston, TX 77027
Phone: (713) 993-0660
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.
Jason M. Welborn - Of Counsel
617 S. Buchanan Street
PO Box 2053
Lafayette, LA 70501
Phone: (337) 443-4100
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

facebook twitter google_plus_32

  • Supreme Court Requests Response from GTECH in Nettles Appeal
    The Texas Supreme Court has issued a Response Request to GTECH (now doing business as IGT) in the Nettles v. GTECH case.  What does this mean?  It means that at least one Justice wanted to see a response from GTECH before deciding whether to grant or deny Ms. Nettles’ Petition for Review.  As a reminder, Ms. Nettles […]
  • Dangerous Tree Stands
    A lot of our clients are deer hunters.  We recently received a report from Safety Research and Strategies that warns about injuries and deaths associated with defective deer stands.  We wanted to share this report with our clients and friends to urge them to be safe while hunting and to warn them about some of […]
  • Partnership Disputes
    We have received a number of calls from business people who feel that their business partners have cheated them, have taken business opportunities belonging to the business, or have stolen partnership money.  For information about the legal rights and duties you might have as a business partner, view our Partnership Disputes page on this website.
  • Supreme Court Grants GTECH a Second Extension of Time to File Petition for Review
    GTECH filed a Motion for Second Extension of Time to file its Petition for Review in the Fun 5’s lottery lawsuit.  As grounds for its motion, GTECH’s appellate lawyers told the Supreme Court that they have scheduling conflicts including other deadlines for Petitions for Review and other appellate briefs that they have recently filed and are due […]
  • Dawn Nettles Files Petition for Review with Texas Supreme Court
    Dawn Nettles has asked the Texas Supreme Court to review the decision of the Dallas Court of Appeals in her lawsuit against GTECH (IGT).  The Dallas Court ruled that GTECH was entitled to immunity from fraud claims brought by Ms. Nettles.  Ms. Nettles alleged that GTECH made a knowing decision to use instructions that represented […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required