» Texas Lottery Shuts Down Fun 5 Scratch-Off Game Days After Watchdog Asks Court for Deposition

Texas Lottery Shuts Down Fun 5 Scratch-Off Game Days After Watchdog Asks Court for Deposition

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.

Houston, TX (Law Firm Newswire) October 23, 2014 - The Texas Lottery Commission announced its decision to end the Fun 5’s scratch-off game just five days after a Texas Lottery watchdog asked a Travis County Court for the right to depose the Commission over alleged problems with the game.

The move to shut down the game is a major turning point in a controversy that has been gaining momentum. Since the game launched in early September, hundreds of lottery players have complained that official lottery computers had been programmed to deny prizes to some winning Fun 5’s tickets. The Texas Lottery Commission held that those players misunderstood the language in the rules, but did not move to change the language.

Dawn Nettles, the self-appointed lottery watchdog who filed the petition, has chronicled the Commission’s response to the ongoing public uproar on her website, Lotto Report.

“Ms. Nettles and many other lottery players went directly to the Texas Lottery Commission to ask them to address multiple problems with these deceptive tickets” says Richard LaGarde of the LaGarde Law Firm, her attorney. “But the Commission refused to do anything. It is unfortunate that legal action was necessary to get the Lottery Commission to take a first step in the right direction.”

The next step, according to Ms. Nettles, is for the Texas Lottery Commission to honor all of the winning Fun 5’s tickets sold, including the tickets in question in her petition. On her website, she encourages all players to do what they can to obtain their prize money, including writing to the Federal Trade Commission.

The statement from the Texas Lottery Commission announcing the end of the Fun 5’s scratch-off game does not directly acknowledge the problem with the rules of the game. It does acknowledge that many players were confused by the game, and states that no more tickets will be sold after December 5, 2014.

The petition filed by Nettles is Dawn Nettles vs. The Texas Lottery Commission and GTECH Corporation, cause number D-1-GN-14-004345, filed in the Travis County District Court for the 345th Judicial District of Texas.

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C
3000 Weslayan, Ste. 380
Houston, TX 77027
Phone: (713) 993-0660
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.
Jason M. Welborn - Of Counsel
617 S. Buchanan Street
PO Box 2053
Lafayette, LA 70501
Phone: (337) 443-4100
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

facebook twitter google_plus_32

  • Dawn Nettles Files Motion for En Banc Reconsideration in Fun 5’s Appeal
    Plaintiff Dawn Nettles has asked the Court of Appeals for the 5th District in Dallas for an en banc reconsideration of its decision to grant immunity to GTECH (n/k/a IGT) the private contractor that operates the Texas Lottery.  In Nettles’ Motion for En Banc Reconsideration, Nettles’ appellate attorney, Peter Kelly, asked the entire Dallas Court of […]
  • Plaintiffs in Fun 5’s Suit File Letter Brief with Austin Court of Appeals
    Over 1,000 Texas consumers filed a letter brief with the Austin Court of Appeals today.  The brief was was filed in response to a letter brief filed by GTECH (IGT).  In its brief, GTECH urged the Austin Court to adopt the ruling recently made by the Dallas Court of Appeals.  The Dallas opinion held that […]
  • Dallas Court of Appeals Rules Against Dawn Nettles in Favor of GTECH
    A three-judge panel of the Dallas Court of Appeals issued an opinion today in which the court ruled that GTECH has “derivative governmental immunity” which shields it from being sued for fraud related to the Texas Lottery’s Fun 5’s scratch-off game.  A copy of the opinion can be read here: Dallas Court of Appeals’ Opinion.
  • Did Exposure to Chemicals Cause My Leukemia?
    I was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia over one year ago.  After multiple rounds of chemotherapy and a stem cell transplant, I am happy to report that I am in complete remission.  As a trial attorney who has represented consumers for more than 30 years, I want to understand what caused my leukemia.  I will […]
  • Nettles and GTECH File Post Submission Briefs in Dallas
    Attorney Peter Kelly, appellate counsel for Dawn Nettles, filed Nettles’Post Submission Brief with the Dallas Court of Appeals.  The brief deals with the question of whether the Texas Legislature intended for GTECH to have derivative governmental immunity.  In response, GTECH’s appellate counsel filed GTECH’s Response to Nettles’ Post Submission Brief.  In its response, GTECH argued that the Texas […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required