Contract Breaches and Ignored Non-compete Agreements Cost a Houston Hospital Millions

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) June 15, 2011 - The University General Hospital in Houston and its affiliated companies – Ascension Physician Solutions and Luxxus Health Systems – are under scrutiny after a jury slammed a hefty verdict against them in Houston's 270th State District Court. Prexus Health LLC was awarded $7.86 million in the complex lawsuit.

Austin Business Litigation Lawyer and Employment Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Luxxus was found to have interfered with confidentiality and noncompete agreements by employing past Prexus executives and workers to perform similar jobs at the Houston hospital. University General Hospital was found to have wrongfully terminated and breached contractual agreements with Prexus.

The contractual agreements involved management and administrative services at the hospital. The 72-bed specialty hospital is part of Houston’s massive Texas Medical Center. University General Hospital is no stranger to lawsuits. Over the last couple of years, it has settled disputes involving alleged contract breaches, unpaid equipment leases and rents, and other matters, according to its March 28, 2011 filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

“Businesses must be diligent about meeting their contractual obligations or they potentially face stiff consequences,” said Austin business litigation attorney and Austin non-compete attorney Gregory D. Jordan. “Texas law on non-compete agreements has changed dramatically in the last five years. Expert legal counsel is often advisable when a business faces questions regarding its hiring policies and non-compete agreements or wants to hire workers from inside an industry.”

Non-compete agreements may be critical to businesses seeking to protect their trade secrets, confidential business information, client and vendor lists, as well as sales and marketing strategies. “You see many types of non-compete agreements,” said Jordan, who has extensive experience representing employers and employees in disputes involving these types of agreements. “Some of them are enforceable and some are not. It usually pays to have a knowledgeable attorney review a non-compete agreement as it can have a long-term impact on both the business and the employee.”

The movement of employees between businesses can provide fertile grounds for disputes. Sometimes the disputes are warranted and sometimes they are not. The issue with the University General Hospital in Houston was obviously a dispute where the jury found inappropriate conduct had occurred. To learn more, please contact Austin non-compete attorney, Austin business litigation lawyer and Austin business attorney Gregory D. Jordan at http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com or call (512) 419-0684.

To learn more, contact Austin employment attorney and Austin business attorney, Gregory D. Jordan or visit http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com.
Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684

Other Practice Areas offered by the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan

[mappress mapid="39"]

• Texas Lawmakers Pass Law to Curtail Common Oil and Gas Scam Tactic
  To some extent, the history of Texas is closely tied to the state’s historically ample supply of oil and gas. Texas has been at the forefront when it comes to establishing oil and gas laws throughout the country. Unfortunately, due to the value of the commodity, over the years, enterprising scammers have come up with [...]
• Texas Court Holds Plaintiff Failed to “Pierce the Corporate Veil” of Employer 
  One of the primary factors business owners consider when choosing how to set up their company is how each type of structure will impact their personal liability, should the business fail, or incur sizable debt during its operation. Historically, there have been three main types of business organization structures: sole proprietorship, partnership and corporation. Sole [...]
• Texas employees who are pregnant or recently returning from maternity leave are protected from employment discrimination
  In 1964, the United States Congress passed the Civil Rights Act. The Civil Rights Act was a landmark piece of legislation that ended segregation of public places and banned discrimination based on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Civil Rights Act did much to combat the discrimination that was common [...]

Tags: Austin business attorney, Austin business lawyer, Austin business litigation attorney, Austin business litigation lawyer, austin employment attorney, austin employment lawyer