Wrongful Death may Involve Breach of Implied Warranty in Product Lawsuits | Law Firm Newswire

Wrongful Death may Involve Breach of Implied Warranty in Product Lawsuits

Atlanta, GA (Law Firm Newswire) September 1, 2011 - Some cases involving a death may involve a breach of implied warranty. No two cases are ever alike, making the outcome unpredictable.

“In this reported case, a driller was killed after the drill he was operating, a 380,000 pound Pit Viper 351, toppled over, throwing him from the cab,” said Stephen Ozcomert, an Atlanta injury lawyer who practices personal injury, accident and malpractice law. “The worker was dead on impact. It turned out that one of the drill’s leveling jacks gave way and caused the drill to fall sideways.”

Stephen Ozcomert is an Atlanta Personal Injury Lawyer

Stephen Ozcomert is an Atlanta Personal Injury Lawyer

The man’s wife realized that she could not possibly move forward with her life with any degree of financial certainty as her husband had been the sole provider for their family. She chose to file a wrongful death lawsuit against the company her husband worked for and the company that supplied the bolts for the leveling jack.

“This is where the case got a bit complicated,” Ozcomert indicated. “The drill was made by Atlas Copco. The bolts were supplied by Standard Hardware. The company the man worked for was United Taconite. When the wrongful death lawsuit was filed, Atlas brought third-party claims for contribution and indemnity against United Taconite. They filed a counterclaim against Atlas for negligence, fraud, breach of warranty and several other issues dealing with the lease and sale of the Pit Viper.”

This turned into a jury trial and the jury found that United Taconite should be awarded $2.9 million in damages from Atlas. It was also discovered that Atlas breached its implied warranty to United on the Pit Viper drill, and that they were 100 percent liable for the driller operator’s death. The drill was defective, dangerous, and the proximate cause of the man’s injuries and death.

An implied warranty of merchantability is not written in stone. In fact, it is not written at all. It is an unwritten and unspoken guarantee to a buyer that goods they are purchasing are up to ordinary standards, and of the same average grade, quality and value as other similar items sold in similar circumstances. “In English, that just means that goods people buy are fit to be used as they are supposed to be used,” added Ozcomert, an Atlanta personal injury lawyer.

And what about the wife’s lawsuit? “She settled out of court with United Taconite,” said Ozcomert. “The rest of the case went to court for the various issues we discussed. It just shows you that even when death is center stage and someone wants justice for a loved one, commerce still moves forward to complete another business day. It also shows that wrongful death actions can come about in a variety of different ways and have different outcomes. If you ever find yourself in a situation like this, please don’t hesitate to call my office for assistance. That’s my job to help you get justice when you lose someone you love because of the negligence of another.”

To learn more, contact Atlanta personal injury lawyer, Stephen Ozcomert by visiting http://www.ozcomert.com.

Stephen M. Ozcomert, PC
215 North McDonough Street
Decatur, Georgia 30030
Call: (404)-370-1000

Atlanta office is by appointment only.
Stephen M. Ozcomert, PC
3575 Piedmont Road NE
Suite 1560-B
Atlanta GA 30305
Call: (404)-370-1000

  • Mall Liability for Negligent Security in Georgia
    A property owner who has notice of substantially similar prior crimes on his or her property may be held accountable in an Atlanta premises liability lawsuit. In a recent Georgia appellate decision, the court considered an appeal arising out of a car accident that occurred at a mall. The plaintiffs, a mother and daughter, were […]
  • Duty to Use Reasonable Care in Another’s House in Georgia
    In a recent Georgia personal injury action, the plaintiff sued the defendant, who worked for an electrical services company, when she fell on her as they walked down a staircase in her home. The plaintiff had asked the company for electrical services. Its two employees, one of whom was the defendant, met her to inspect […]
  • Apportionment in an Atlanta Truck Accident Lawsuit
    In a recent appellate case, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled on an important issue regarding apportionment of fault in truck accident lawsuits. The case arose when a man crossing the street was hit by a truck driven by the defendant and owned by the defendant’s employer. The administrator of the man’s estate sued the defendants […]

Tags: , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required