Patent Attorney With Brooks Acordia Explains Importance Of Provisional Patent Applications | Law Firm Newswire

Patent Attorney With Brooks Acordia Explains Importance Of Provisional Patent Applications

Los Angeles, CA (Law Firm Newswire) October 21, 2013 - Under the “first-inventor-to-file” patent system created by the America Invents Act (AIA) of 2011, an increasing number of inventors are encouraged to file provisional patent applications.

A local intellectual property attorney says that because filing a provisional application secures a priority date with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the process is likely to be employed far more than it was under the nation's former—pre-AIA “first to invent” patent system.

“Provisional applications are more important than ever under the “first to file” regime of the America Invents Act,” said Los Angeles patent attorney Pejman “PJ” Yedidsion. “We encourage all our clients to file provisional applications early, and often, in the course of development of their inventions.”

A provisional patent application is an inexpensive way to begin the patent process. The fee due the USPTO for small entities (individuals and companies with 500 or fewer employees) is currently $130, and the fee for micro entities (available under the AIA) is just $65. Small entities not named on more than four previous patent applications and not exceeding three times the national median household income may qualify as micro entities.

It is important to note that the word “provisional” describes the application, not the patent – there is no such thing as a “provisional patent.”

Provisional applications do not require a formal patent claim, formal drawings, or an information disclosure statement (prior art statement). For this reason, they are relatively easy to prepare, and associated legal fees are affordable. As soon as a provisional patent application has been filed, the inventor may apply a “patent pending” claim to their invention and/or products.

“The first provisional application should be filed as early as possible – that is, as soon as the invention can be clearly described,” Yedidsion went on. “Inventors need not worry that the invention will inevitably change in nature as the process continues. Subsequent provisional applications should be filed whenever the invention changes in any significant way.”

A provisional application provides a 12-month benefit of priority to non-provisional applications and foreign-filed applications – for example, PCT applications. A corresponding non-provisional application must be filed during that period in order to benefit from the earlier filing date of the provisional application, otherwise the provisional application becomes abandoned. Filing subsequent provisional applications will not extend the 12-month period.

Yedidsion added that another way in which the AIA encourages provisional applications is by weakening the one-year grace period protecting patentability. Prior to the AIA, inventors had a one-year grace period in which to file an application after their invention was publicly disclosed by themselves or a third party. Now, that grace period only protects disclosures made by the inventor or derived from the inventor.

“The disclosures of a third party can destroy the patentability of your invention under AIA,” Yedidsion said. “Accordingly, it is a good idea to file a provisional application as soon as you can describe your invention in concrete terms.”

Brooks Acordia IP Law, P.C.
1445 E. Los Angeles Ave. #108
Simi Valley, CA 93065-2827
Phone: (805) 579-2500
Fax: (805) 584-6427




  • New Guidance On What Is Patentable by the USPTO
    Since the Alice decision, there has been a lot of confusion about what is patentable – especially for life science and software related patents. At the beginning of 2019, the USPTO has issued new guidelines for determining patetability. These new guidelines set forth that non-patentable subject matter, or “judicial exceptions”, include abstract ideas such as “mathematical concepts, certain methods of organizing human activity, and mental processes.” Additionally, it also includes “laws of nature and natural phenomena.” It further goes on to say ...
  • Grace period and on sale bar related to “secret” sales
    In a Supreme Court decision which was unanimous and authored by Justice Thomas, the Court reiterated the significance of offering a product for sale and how it affects the patent eligibility of the product. In Helsinn Healthcare v. Teva Pharma USA (Supreme Court 2019) the Court was asked to look at the enacted AIA and whether “secret” sales continue to qualify as prior art under the revised Section 102.  The court examined the provision that “an inventor’s sale of an invention to a ...
  • Trademark and Trade-dress Laws
    Christian Louboutin’s signature red-soled heels are universally known as the ultimate signs of luxury in the shoe fashion world. However, despite their fame, the question arises of whether Louboutin can trademark his red soles as exclusively his own.<br />
    Louboutin has attempted to obtain trademarks in several countries, and the verdicts are varied. In Switzerland, for example, Louboutin was denied trademark protection because the court ruled that the red sole was not of distinctive character. However, Louboutin has successfully obtained trademarks ...

Tags: , , , , ,

Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required