Texas Lottery Player Files Petition in Scratcher Controversy over Fun 5 Scratch-Off Ticket | Law Firm Newswire

Texas Lottery Player Files Petition in Scratcher Controversy over Fun 5 Scratch-Off Ticket

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.

Houston, TX (Law Firm Newswire) October 16, 2014 - Dawn Nettles has filed an official petition with the Travis County District Court in the growing controversy over the Texas Lottery Fun 5’s scratch-off ticket.

“We’re just trying to get some basic answers,” said Richard LaGarde, an attorney for Ms. Nettles. “The public deserves to know who is responsible for this situation, and what will be done about it.”

An increasing number of lottery players are expressing their anger over what they regard as deceptive language in the Fun 5’s rules. Language on the ticket suggests that the combination of a Money Bag symbol and a dollar amount means that the player has won a prize for that game.

Following that language, some players believed they had won hundreds of thousands of dollars. But when players with the winning combination took the tickets to be scanned, the machine told them that they hadn’t won anything. Many want to know who made the decision to treat the tickets as losing tickets.

The petition seeks a court order to depose representatives from the Texas Lottery Commission and GTECH Corporation, the company that operates the Texas Lottery. According to lawyers for Ms. Nettles, the purpose of the deposition is to find out who is responsible for the language used on the Fun 5’s ticket.

Before filing a petition, Ms. Nettles wrote repeatedly to both to the Texas Lottery Commission and to state and local officials, asking that someone take responsibility and act to end the ongoing problem.

The Texas Lottery Commission has not announced plans to rectify the language in the rule, and continues to sell Fun 5’s tickets despite acknowledging a number of player complaints.

“The Texas Lottery Commission holds itself to a high standard,” commented Mr. LaGarde. “It is time for them to act with integrity in this situation so they can begin to earn back the trust of the public.”

Ms. Nettles' lawyers say that despite filing a petition with the court, their client is still hopeful that the Texas Lottery Commission will do the right thing, alleviating the need for any further legal action.

pdf_icon Download the Verified Petition to Take Depositions

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C
3000 Weslayan, Ste. 380
Houston, TX 77027
Phone: (713) 993-0660
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.
Jason M. Welborn - Of Counsel
617 S. Buchanan Street
PO Box 2053
Lafayette, LA 70501
Phone: (337) 443-4100
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

facebook twitter google_plus_32

  • Court Enters Scheduling Order for Fun 5’s Trial
    <p>The 201st Judicial District Court in Travis County, Texas has issued a Docket Control Order setting a series of deadlines for the first bellwether trial against GTECH, Inc. (n/k/a IGT) in the Fun 5’s lawsuit. The Court has set a trial date of April 25, 2022, and has ordered the parties to participate in a […]</p>
    The post <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com/blog/">Blog</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com">LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.</a>.
  • Court Holds Hearing on GTECH’s No Evidence Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
    <p>The Honorable Amy Clark Meachum, judge of the 201st Judicial District Court in Austin, held a hearing today on GTECH’s No Evidence Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. GTECH Corporation (n/k/a IGT Global Solutions Corporation) was sued by hundreds of Texas Lottery players. The players allege that GTECH designed and printed instructions on the Fun 5’s […]</p>
    The post <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com/blog/">Blog</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com">LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.</a>.
  • Court Holds Status Conference in Fun 5’s Lawsuit
    <p>The 201st Civil District Court in Travis County held a status conference today. Attorneys representing the plaintiffs, intervenors, and Defendant GTECH participated. Judge Amy Clark Meachum agreed with the attorneys that it makes sense to hold a series of “bellwether” trials instead of attempting to hold one trial for all plaintiffs at the same time. […]</p>
    The post <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com/blog/">Blog</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com">LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.</a>.
  • GTECH Decides Not to Ask Court to Reconsider
    <p>The Texas Supreme Court recently decided not to grant immunity to GTECH Corporation (n/k/a IGT) for fraud claims filed by over 1,000 Texas lottery players. GTECH did not ask the Court to reconsider its decision before the deadline to do so. That is not surprising since the Court seldom grants a request to reconsider one […]</p>
    The post <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com/blog/">Blog</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com">LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.</a>.
  • Mark Lanier Wins $2.1 Billion Appeal Against Johnson & Johnson
    <p>Attorney Mark Lanier represented 22 women who alleged that Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder contained asbestos and caused them to suffer ovarian cancer. A Missouri jury awarded Lanier’s clients $4.69 billion in damages. J&J appealed the jury’s verdict. A Missouri appellate court upheld that jury verdict this week and found that J&J’ engaged in “reprehensible conduct” […]</p>
    The post <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com/blog/">Blog</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com">LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.</a>.

Tags: , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required