» Judge Rejects Request for Pre-Suit Discovery from Texas Lottery

Judge Rejects Request for Pre-Suit Discovery from Texas Lottery

Texas state district court judge Stephen Yelenosky has rejected a request for depositions in the ongoing controversy over the Fun 5’s scratch-off game by the Texas lottery.

Attorneys Richard LaGarde and Mary LaGarde

“If the Texas lottery is not open and fair in all respects, it loses legitimacy in the eyes of the people and their elected representatives.” - Richard LaGarde

Houston, TX (Law Firm Newswire) November 18, 2014 - Lawyers for lottery watchdog Dawn Nettles sought to take the pre-suit deposition of representatives of the Texas Lottery Commission (TLC) and lottery operator GTECH Corporation. Nettles and hundreds of other Fun 5’s players hold tickets that they believe to be winning tickets based on language on the ticket, but that TLC says are losers. Nettles argued that TLC and GTECH should be forced to say who was responsible for the language on the tickets.

Richard LaGarde of the LaGarde Law Firm, one of the attorneys for Ms. Nettles and for over 400 additional lottery players, says that the lottery is not being fair to players. “These folks spent their hard-earned money for lottery tickets. Now the Texas Lottery Commission refuses to honor the rules of its own game, and it refuses to give anyone any answers. If the lottery is not open and fair in all respects, it loses legitimacy in the eyes of the people and their elected representatives.”

Averaging more than $3 million in weekly ticket sales since it was introduced on September 1st, the Fun 5’s scratch-off game was one of the Texas Lottery’s top selling games. However, almost immediately after the launch of the game, angry consumers began complaining to their State Representatives when tickets they believed to be winners were rejected as losers.

On October 21st, the Lottery Commission announced it would be prematurely ending the game because of what it described as “confusion regarding certain aspects of this popular game.”

Judge Yelenosky’s ruling did not comment on the merits of Nettles’ case. It simply means that Nettles and hundreds of her fellow lottery players will now have to file suit in order to get answers.

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C
3000 Weslayan, Ste. 380
Houston, TX 77027
Phone: (713) 993-0660
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.
Jason M. Welborn - Of Counsel
617 S. Buchanan Street
PO Box 2053
Lafayette, LA 70501
Phone: (337) 443-4100
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

facebook twitter google_plus_32

  • Briefing Schedule in Steele et al. v. GTECH
    The current briefing schedule in the Texas Supreme Court is as follows: Respondents’ (Plaintiffs’) Brief on the Merits is due on February 19, 2019; Petitioner’s (GTECH) Reply Brieff is due March 6, 2019. Once those briefs are filed, the Supreme Court may decide to grant GTECH’s Petition for Review, it may decide to deny the […]
  • GTECH Files Brief on the Merits in Fun 5’s Appeal
    GTECH filed a 157 page brief on the merits in the Steele et. al v. GTECH, Inc. lawsuit pending in the Texas Supreme Court.  In its brief, GTECH argues that the Supreme Court should grant GTECH’s petition for review.  GTECH wants the Supreme Court to overturn the Austin Court of Appeals’ decision that allowed approximately […]
  • Supreme Court Grants GTECH Final Extension of Time to File Brief
    The Texas Supreme Court has granted a second extension of time to GTECH to file its brief on the merits in the Steele et al. v. GTECH lawsuit.  In its Order Granting GTECH’s Second Motion for Extension of Time, the Court ordered GTECH to file its brief on or before December 28, 2018, and warned GTECH […]
  • Supreme Court Requests Briefs on the Merits in both Steele and Nettles Cases
    The Supreme Court of Texas has requested that the parties provide detailed briefs on the merits in both the Steele mass action lawsuit and in the Nettles lawsuit against GTECH.  The Court gave the parties in both cases the following deadlines: Petitioner’s brief due no later than October 29, 2018; Response brief due November 19, […]
  • Supreme Court Requests Briefs in Nettles’ Fun 5’s Lawsuit
    The Texas Supreme Court issued a Request for Briefs on the Merits in the Dawn Nettles lawsuit against GTECH this evening.  Ms. Nettles sued GTECH in Dallas.  The Dallas trial judge ruled that GTECH was immune from suit for fraud.  The Dallas Court of Appeals agreed with the Dallas trial court and ruled that GTECH cannot […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , ,

Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required