New Study Confirms: FDA Medical Device Approval Process Flawed | Law Firm Newswire

New Study Confirms: FDA Medical Device Approval Process Flawed

Houston, TX (Law Firm Newswire) December 30, 2014 - Studies are again criticizing the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), saying its fast-track process for medical devices approves many that do not meet regulatory standards.

The National Center for Health Research reports that a worrying majority of medical devices approved under the FDA’s fast-track process lack publicly available safety documentation. Without this documentation, doctors and hospitals cannot accurately assess the risk a device poses to patients.

“The FDA gets a lot of pressure from medical device companies that want to beat the competition to market,” commented Richard LaGarde, a defective products attorney. “Sadly, despite previous warnings on this issue, this new study shows that the FDA is still doing a poor job of putting patient safety first.”

Previously, a major study called the FDA’s fast-track medical device approval process “fatally flawed.” That study, published in 2011, attributed a growing number of device failures and recalls to inadequate testing, according to Reuters.

The FDA commissioned the 2011 report after major headlines brought publicity to a number of massive medical device recalls.

But upon receipt of the 2011 report, the FDA immediately rejected the findings and continued using the controversial fast-track approval process with few improvements. Last month, FDA officials announced at a medical device conference that they would be searching for ways to make the medical device approval process even faster.

The latest study from the National Center for Health Research looked at more than a thousand devices approved under the fast-track process, and found that 84 percent lacked publicly-available documentation showing why the device should be considered safe.

“At the end of the day, the manufacturer is responsible for ensuring that the device is safe,” said LaGarde. “Nonetheless, it is frightening to know how easy it is for a company to have a device declared safe by the FDA, even when the device does not meet the FDA’s own standards.”

Currently, most medical devices are approved under the fast-track process.

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C
3000 Weslayan, Ste. 380
Houston, TX 77027
Phone: (713) 993-0660
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.
Jason M. Welborn - Of Counsel
617 S. Buchanan Street
PO Box 2053
Lafayette, LA 70501
Phone: (337) 443-4100
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

facebook twitter google_plus_32

  • Court Enters Scheduling Order for Fun 5’s Trial
    <p>The 201st Judicial District Court in Travis County, Texas has issued a Docket Control Order setting a series of deadlines for the first bellwether trial against GTECH, Inc. (n/k/a IGT) in the Fun 5’s lawsuit. The Court has set a trial date of April 25, 2022, and has ordered the parties to participate in a […]</p>
    The post <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com/blog/">Blog</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com">LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.</a>.
  • Court Holds Hearing on GTECH’s No Evidence Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
    <p>The Honorable Amy Clark Meachum, judge of the 201st Judicial District Court in Austin, held a hearing today on GTECH’s No Evidence Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. GTECH Corporation (n/k/a IGT Global Solutions Corporation) was sued by hundreds of Texas Lottery players. The players allege that GTECH designed and printed instructions on the Fun 5’s […]</p>
    The post <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com/blog/">Blog</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com">LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.</a>.
  • Court Holds Status Conference in Fun 5’s Lawsuit
    <p>The 201st Civil District Court in Travis County held a status conference today. Attorneys representing the plaintiffs, intervenors, and Defendant GTECH participated. Judge Amy Clark Meachum agreed with the attorneys that it makes sense to hold a series of “bellwether” trials instead of attempting to hold one trial for all plaintiffs at the same time. […]</p>
    The post <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com/blog/">Blog</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com">LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.</a>.
  • GTECH Decides Not to Ask Court to Reconsider
    <p>The Texas Supreme Court recently decided not to grant immunity to GTECH Corporation (n/k/a IGT) for fraud claims filed by over 1,000 Texas lottery players. GTECH did not ask the Court to reconsider its decision before the deadline to do so. That is not surprising since the Court seldom grants a request to reconsider one […]</p>
    The post <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com/blog/">Blog</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com">LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.</a>.
  • Mark Lanier Wins $2.1 Billion Appeal Against Johnson & Johnson
    <p>Attorney Mark Lanier represented 22 women who alleged that Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder contained asbestos and caused them to suffer ovarian cancer. A Missouri jury awarded Lanier’s clients $4.69 billion in damages. J&J appealed the jury’s verdict. A Missouri appellate court upheld that jury verdict this week and found that J&J’ engaged in “reprehensible conduct” […]</p>
    The post <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com/blog/">Blog</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.lagardelaw.com">LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.</a>.

Tags: , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required