» Lawsuit Against Texas Lottery Operator Expands: Players Now Seek $440 Million Dollars

Lawsuit Against Texas Lottery Operator Expands: Players Now Seek $440 Million Dollars

"...the company did nothing for more than six weeks, while players continued to buy tickets in good faith." - Richard LaGarde

"...the company did nothing for more than six weeks, while players continued to buy tickets in good faith." - Richard LaGarde

Houston, TX (Law Firm Newswire) February 11, 2015 - More than 400 Texas lottery players have joined a lawsuit alleging that Texas Lottery operator GTECH Corporation owes them millions in unpaid winnings.

The controversy began last fall, when players of the now-discontinued Fun 5’s scratch-off game began to complain that lottery redemption computers were rejecting some winning tickets. Despite mounting player complaints, GTECH and lottery officials allowed the Fun 5’s game to continue for nearly two months.

Two hundred and fifty players filed a lawsuit in December for $248 million in unpaid winnings. Now, attorneys for the plaintiffs have filed an amended petition, adding 419 players to the list of plaintiffs and raising the damages sought to $438 million. The lawsuit alleges that GTECH negligently programmed its computers to reject some winning tickets from the Fun 5’s scratch off game.

“GTECH could have fixed the problem as early as one week into the game, but the company did nothing for more than six weeks, while players continued to buy tickets in good faith,” remarked Richard LaGarde, an attorney for the plaintiffs in this case. “It is because of GTECH’s own actions that the number of plaintiffs in this case continues to grow.”

The dispute revolves around Game 5 on the Fun 5’s game ticket. The instructions on the ticket state, “Reveal a Money Bag symbol in the 5X BOX, win 5 times that PRIZE.” But GTECH computers did not award a prize to many players holding tickets with the symbol in the 5x box.

Officials claim that winning the money bag prize was dependent on having already won a prize from a tic-tac-toe game on the same ticket. But attorneys for the plaintiffs point out that the rules never state that a player had to win the tic-tac-toe game to be eligible for the money bag prize.

“Players participate in the lottery because they expect to receive the prizes that they are promised in the rules of the game,” said LaGarde. “GTECH programmed its computers to deny players their rightful winnings, and the company needs to take responsibility for that if anyone is to have any faith in the Texas Lottery in the future.”

The amended petition was filed in Travis County state district court on January 26, 2015. The case is Steele v. GTECH Corporations, case no. D-1-GN-14-005114.

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C
3000 Weslayan, Ste. 380
Houston, TX 77027
Phone: (713) 993-0660
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

LaGarde Law Firm, P.C.
Jason M. Welborn - Of Counsel
617 S. Buchanan Street
PO Box 2053
Lafayette, LA 70501
Phone: (337) 443-4100
Toll Free: 1-866-LAGARDE

facebook twitter google_plus_32

  • Benzene Spike Near Houston Chemical Plant Fire Causes Me Concern About Future Leukemia Cases
    Having survived a battle with Leukemia, I am concerned by the latest report in the Houston Chronicle that a spike in benzene levels has been detected near the Deer Park site of the ITC chemical plant fire. Benzene is a major cause of leukemia which is a cancer of the bone marrow. Leukemia is a […]
  • GTECH Files Reply Brief in Fun 5’s Case
    GTECH filed its Reply Brief on the Merits in the Fun 5’s scratch-off lottery ticket lawsuit currently pending before the Texas Supreme Court. Now that all the briefs have been filed in Steele et al. v. GTECH, the Supreme Court is likely to take one of two steps. It may either deny GTECH’s Petition for […]
  • Plaintiffs in Fun 5’s Lawsuit File Their Brief on the Merits
    Plaintiffs in the Fun 5’s lawsuit in Texas filed their Respondents’ Brief on the Merits  today.  In their 61 page brief, attorneys for the Plaintiffs argue that GTECH (now known as IGT) is not entitled to derivative sovereign immunity.  GTECH claims it was just following orders when it printed scratch-off lottery tickets with instructions that falsely […]
  • Briefing Schedule in Steele et al. v. GTECH
    The current briefing schedule in the Texas Supreme Court is as follows: Respondents’ (Plaintiffs’) Brief on the Merits is due on February 19, 2019; Petitioner’s (GTECH) Reply Brieff is due March 6, 2019. Once those briefs are filed, the Supreme Court may decide to grant GTECH’s Petition for Review, it may decide to deny the […]
  • GTECH Files Brief on the Merits in Fun 5’s Appeal
    GTECH filed a 157 page brief on the merits in the Steele et. al v. GTECH, Inc. lawsuit pending in the Texas Supreme Court.  In its brief, GTECH argues that the Supreme Court should grant GTECH’s petition for review.  GTECH wants the Supreme Court to overturn the Austin Court of Appeals’ decision that allowed approximately […]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , ,

Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required