» Production Line Justice: Immigration Judges Told to Meet Quotas

Production Line Justice: Immigration Judges Told to Meet Quotas

Dallas immigration lawyers

Dallas immigration lawyers - Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C.

Dallas, TX (Law Firm Newswire) May 11, 2018 – The Department of Justice is imposing quotas on immigration judges with the aim of addressing a backlog of more than 650,000 pending immigration cases. The Department’s Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) has introduced a new set of metrics that will be directly linked to the immigration judges’ annual performance reviews.

“Judges make hard decisions in weighing the merits of each case. Do we want our judges to focus on how little time their decisions took to reach, or on making the right decision in light of the facts and the law?,” said Stewart Rabinowitz of the Dallas and Frisco, Texas law firm of Rabinowitz & Rabinowitz, P.C.

According to a directive issued on March 30, 2018, immigration judges will be evaluated on the basis of how promptly they process cases and the number of cases they hear. Judges will be required to clear a minimum of 700 cases each year to receive a “satisfactory” performance grade. Those that adjudicate under 560 cases will be given an “unsatisfactory” rating. The new metrics will be enforced starting on October 1, 2018.

The quota system is an effort to speed up the courts and reduce the backlog of cases, which has been a priority for the Trump administration. The EOIR directive states that the metrics are designed to “encourage efficient and effective case management while preserving immigration judge discretion and due process.” However, advocates and the National Association of Immigration Judges have been highly critical of the numerical standards, saying they could potentially endanger the fairness of courts.

“All legal work takes time, and justice on a time measure model is demeaning not only to those who make such decisions, and those who receive it but also to our judicial system,” said Rabinowitz. “Our Pledge of Allegiance concludes ‘. . . with liberty and justice for all.’ Is there now an exception for foreign nationals in removal proceedings where justice is now to be measured by how many cases a judge moved instead of justice for every person?”

The memo details highly specific performance benchmarks for immigration judges such as how much time they should spend on various case types and court motions. For example, judges have three days from a hearing in which to complete cases that involve a detained immigrant and 10 days to finish cases in which the immigrant is not detained. Unlike other courts, immigration judges report to the attorney general as immigration courts are part of the Executive Branch.

By Appointment Only
Three Galleria Tower
13155 Noel Road, Suite 900
Dallas, TX 75240
http://www.rabinowitzrabinowitz.com

  • CRS Addresses Legal Issues in Migrant Protection Protocols for Asylum Applicants
    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on January 28, 2019, started implementing a new policy that requires Central American asylum seekers arriving at the southern border of the United States to wait in Mexico while their cases are processed in U.S. immigration courts. In a report released on February 6, 2019, the Congressional Research Service ...
  • CRS Examines Per Country Immigration Limits in Employment Based Immigration
    The Congressional Research Service (CRS) released a report on the employment-based immigration process on December 21, 2018, recommending the removal of per-country ceilings on visa numbers, or caps, for employment-based prospective immigrants applying for lawful permanent resident status. As background, the current U.S. immigration systems allots a maximum 7 percent quota to each country for ...
  • Court Enjoins Pentagon Policy on Permanent Residents Serving in the U.S. Military
    On November 30, 2018, a federal court enjoined a Trump administration policy adopted last year that called for enhanced background checks for lawful permanent residents wanting to serve in the U.S. military. The extra vetting in addition to biometrics screening and other existing requirements caused long delays that have prevented potential recruits from reporting for ...

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA |



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required