» Murphy Oil Settles for 100,000 Dollars EEOC Claim it Discriminated Against Worker With Bad Back

Murphy Oil Settles for 100,000 Dollars EEOC Claim it Discriminated Against Worker With Bad Back

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) November 16, 2018 - The operator of a nationwide chain of gas stations has agreed to pay $100,000 to settle a claim that it unlawfully rejected a manager’s request for an accommodation for his bad back.

Gregory D. Jordan, an employment attorney with the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan in Austin, Texas, notes, “This case helps illustrate why it is so important for an employer to have a candid discussion with any employee that asserts he or she has a disability and requests a reasonable accommodation.”

Murphy Oil USA, in addition to paying damages, also agreed to implement written policies to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and to train its employees regarding their responsibilities under the federal disability discrimination law.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed the lawsuit on behalf of a long-term employee who alleged that Murphy Oil required him to perform work that violated physician-imposed restrictions that help him cope with a serious back condition. According to the EEOC, the employee was fired after he complained to Murphy Oil management about the company’s failure to accommodate his physical limitations.

The EEOC charged that Murphy Oil’s actions violated the ADA. The ADA requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations for a worker’s disability unless it would cause a significant expense or difficulty to the employer. In addition to unlawfully failing to accommodate the employee’s disability, Murphy Oil’s retaliation against the employee by firing him also violated the ADA, the EEOC charged.

EEOC officials said that the lesson to be drawn from the settlement is that employers, when informed that an employee has a disability, should initiate a dialogue with the employee designed to find a reasonable accommodation rather than simply terminating the employee.

In this case, the government said, that dialogue never took place.

“If the employer and employee do not have a good discussion about the employee’s disability, problems can easily arise,” concludes Jordan.

The case is EEOC v. Murphy Oil USA, No. 2:16-CV-00048-AM-CW (W.D. Texas, settlement announced Aug. 13, 2018).

Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684


View Larger Map

  • Co-owner dispute at Spider House in Austin, Texas gets serious
    The Spider House Cafe and Ballroom has been a famous Austin college hang-out since it opened its doors in 1995. Most customers, however, probably do not know of the legal battle between the two co-owners of the business, John Dorgan and Conrad Bejarano. In October of 2018, Dorgan filed a lawsuit against Bejarano and an [...]
  • Retaliation claim over firing that took place soon after workplace injury should have gone to jury
    The close proximity in time between a construction worker’s termination and his filing of a workers’ compensation claim, along with other factors that called the employer’s justification into question, should have been enough to get the employee past the employer’s motion for a judgment in their favor, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth [...]
  • Disclosure requirements reach mailed, but not emailed, offers to purchase oil interests
    A Texas statute requiring that offers to purchase oil rights contain a conspicuous, large-print disclaimer does not apply to emailed offers, according to a recent ruling from the Texas Court of Appeals in El Paso. The court turned back several arguments why an arbitration clause in an agreement to purchase mineral interests was unconscionable, among [...]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA |



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required