Austin Employment Lawyer Discusses Supreme Court Opinion, Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis | Law Firm Newswire

Austin Employment Lawyer Discusses Supreme Court Opinion, Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin Oil and Gas Attorney, Gregory D. Jordan

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) July 11, 2019 - On June 3, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis. The case discusses the requirement that an employee who believes they have been the victim of discrimination first file a claim with the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (EEOC) before filing a case in court. Ultimately, the Court concluded that this rule, while mandatory, is not jurisdictional. By that, the Court means that a plaintiff’s failure to file a claim with the EEOC will not deprive the court of the power to hear the case and a plaintiff’s case will only be dismissed if the defendant makes a timely objection.

The Court’s decision does not mean that employees do not need to file a claim with the EEOC before filing a case in federal court, only that an employee’s failure to do so does not deprive the court of jurisdiction to hear the case.

In this case, a female employee properly filed a retaliation claim against her employer with the EEOC. While the EEOC was investigating her claim, the woman was terminated after she did not come to work on a Sunday, and instead attended an event for her church. The woman informally “amended” her complaint by jotting down an additional claim of religious discrimination on an intake form.

Initially, the woman’s employer did not mention the woman’s failure to file her claim of religious discrimination with the EEOC. Years into the litigation, the employer argued that the rule requiring plaintiffs file with the EEOC was jurisdictional, and the plaintiff’s failure to file with the EEOC required the Court to dismiss her case.

The Supreme Court disagreed with the employer, holding that the rule was not jurisdictional. The Court went on to explain that by failing to raise the issue in a timely manner, the defendant forfeited the right to object on appeal.

Austin employment attorney Gregory Jordan reminds employees that the Court’s ruling in no way changes the requirement that any Texas discrimination claim must first be filed with the EEOC or the Yexas Workforce Commission(TWC). Attorney Jordan notes that the situation presented by the Davis case is unique, and that typically a case will be dismissed if an employee fails to file their claim with the EEOC or the TWC.

The Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan is an Austin employment law firm that represents both employees and employers in a wide variety of Texas employment issues. Contact the Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan at http://www.theaustintriallawyer.com/.

Law Offices of Gregory D. Jordan
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 310
Austin, Texas 78731
Call: 512-419-0684


View Larger Map

  • Texas High Court Holds Limitation-Of-Liability Clause Can Effectively Bar a Party From Obtaining Punitive Damages
    In November 2018, the state supreme court issued a written opinion in a Texas breach of contract case discussing whether a clause purporting to limit the availability of punitive damages in a contract between two business was enforceable. Ultimately, the court concluded that the term was enforceable and reversed the lower court’s award of punitive [...]
  • Are Texas Arbitration Agreements Between Employers and Their Employees Always Enforceable?
    Over the past decade, it has become common to see arbitration agreements in a variety of business agreements. Indeed, arbitration is the preferred method for many businesses to resolve all kinds of Texas business disputes, whether a dispute is between a company and its customers, employees, suppliers or another business. Recently, forced arbitration clauses have [...]
  • The Duties of the Holder of the Executive Right to Minerals
    In the case of Texas Outfitters, LLC vs. Nicholson, the Texas Supreme Court examined the holder of the executive right’s duty of utmost good faith and fair dealing to non-participating mineral interest owners. In Texas Outfitters, the holder of the executive right to lease minerals refused to sign a lease which the owner of a [...]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA |



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required