» Elder Financial Abuse On The Rise

Elder Financial Abuse On The Rise

Moorestown, NJ (Law Firm Newswire) November 30, 2012 – According to The MetLife Mature Market Institute, approximately five million aging or elderly adults are prey to financial fraud.

MetLife’s Investor Protection Elder Fraud Survey found that one out of every five elderly individuals surveyed had been victimized. Financial experts believe that the number of victims is on the rise, and that for every one case brought to the attention of authorities, 25 cases never get reported. Victims often do not know where to turn after experiencing financial fraud, or are too embarrassed or frightened to report the fraud.

The National Center on Elder Abuse states that the majority of incidences of financial fraud are committed by someone they know, such as a family member, a neighbor or a caregiver. There are also numerous reports of financial professionals, hired by the victim to manage financial affairs, who defraud the elderly. Fraud may take place as a crime of opportunity, or as part of a well-orchestrated, ongoing relationship with the planned intention to commit financial abuse.

“The betrayal is one of the hardest things about financial fraud,” stated New Jersey elder law attorney Thomas D. Begley, Jr. “Most financial fraud crimes are committed against the victims by someone they know, or someone they have hired to protect their interests.”

Financial fraud may include cashing the victim’s Social Security checks without permission, stealing cash, forging the victim’s signature to purchase goods or withdraw their funds, or tricking them into signing a will or contract that includes content they would not otherwise approve.

The older population is a prime target for financial fraud, as cognitive changes in the elderly can mean an increase in vulnerability to financial criminals, and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and vascular dementia are estimated to affect approximately 50 percent of people age 80 and up.

If there is concern that financial fraud has been committed, contact an experienced New Jersey elder law attorney.

To learn more about Begley Law Group call 1.800.533.7227 or visit www.begleylawgroup.com.

Begley Law Group, P.C.
509 S. Lenola Road, Building 7
Moorestown, NJ 08057
Tel: 800.533.7227


  • PLAN/NJ Celebrates 25 Years Of Service And Honors Thomas Begley Jr.
    In 2014 Planned Lifetime Assistance Network of New Jersey celebrated 25 years of service to individuals with severe developmental disabilities and mental health challenges. To commemorate the occasion, PLAN held a wonderful event on June 5th at the New Jersey Law Center, located at One Constitution Square in New Brunswick, NJ. The festivities included cocktails, hors d’oeuvres, a special celebrity silent fundraising auction and a keynote address by Sarah Helena Vazquez, national motivational speaker, advocate, and author.   In addition that evening, PLAN honored several distinguished individuals who have made significant and long-term contributions in improving outcomes and enhancing the quality of [...]
  • THE IMPORTANCE OF PUBLIC BENEFITS IN SETTLING PERSONAL INJURY CASES
    Article by Thomas D. Begley Jr. Public benefits must always be considered in the settlement of a personal injury case.  They are important for two reasons:  (1) whether there is a lien to repay the public benefits, and (2) whether the plaintiff’s continued eligibility for public benefits depends on the establishment of a self-settled special needs trust.  Common public benefits include the following: Supplemental Security Income (SSI)  SSI is a monthly payment from the Social Security Administration to the SSI recipient.  The maximum payment for an individual for 2014 is $721 per month.[1]  For many people this is a significant [...]
  • THE IMPACT OF WINDSOR ON TAX AND PUBLIC BENEFITS PLANNING FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES PART II
    Article by Thomas D. Begley Jr. This is the second part of a two-part article dealing with the impact of Windsor on taxation and public benefits.  This article will examine the impact of Windsor on public benefits planning. In United States v. Windsor,[1] the United States Supreme Court declared §3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional.  This section limited marriage to a union between one man and one woman.  Windsor did not apply to §2 of DOMA, which permits states to refuse to recognize the actions of another state on the issue of same-sex marriage.  Therefore, a couple [...]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required