» Man With BB Gun Shot to Death by Police

Man With BB Gun Shot to Death by Police

Austin, TX (Law Firm Newswire) December 11, 2012 – This wrongful death suit involves police shooting and killing a man armed with a BB gun.

Austin Personal Injury Lawyers

Austin Personal Injury Lawyers - Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP

“It helps to look before shooting,” suggested Brooks Schuelke, an Austin personal injury lawyer with Perlmutter & Schuelke, L.L.P. “It may save wrongful death lawsuits, such as this one, in which the family of the deceased is seeking $20 million in damages for the death of their husband, son and father.”

The 36-year-old deceased was shot to death by members of a SWAT team, and the family alleges he was shot without cause, while in a parking lot visiting with friends. Evidently, the police received a 911 call about someone with a gun. The police responded, and ended up shooting the man, as they state they were threatened with a gun. “In reality,” explained Schuelke, “the gun was a BB rifle the man bought for his son.”

The family and other witnesses suggest the man did not threaten the police with the BB rifle and he was not a danger to them. They suggest the police had their minds made up when they arrived that the man was a danger given his Hispanic origin. However, a neighbor in the area suggested the man may have been shooting out street lights.

When the police arrived, they apparently ran down an alley, in full SWAT gear with assault rifles, turned the corner and found the man near the steps in a small common area. What happened next is not clear, and may never be. However, whatever did happen resulted in the man being shot twice. Officers did attempt to revive him by performing CPR. He died at the scene.

What happened may never be completely understood, but because the police reacted to a perceived threat, a man is dead. This begs the question of how closely they looked at the man and his ‘weapon,’ whether or not they talked to him, asked him to hand over the rifle or if they took anytime to assess the situation, other than noting it was a rifle of some type.

“These questions are likely to find their way into court. Will the outcome favour the deceased’s family? Tough question, as much hinges on the details of what happened between the time the police arrived and the time the man was shot. This encompasses mere seconds and apparently no one has a clear accounting of what triggered the shooting,” said Austin injury lawyer Schuelke. Further information provided by the police includes the dead man had a drug record and was sentenced to three years probation. He was also ordered to take a drug program.

To learn more or to contact an Austin personal injury attorney or Austin injury lawyer, visit http://www.civtrial.com.

Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP
206 East 9th Street, Ste. 1511
Austin, TX 78701
Call (512) 476-4944


View Larger Map

  • I Waited Two Months To Go To The Doctor. Do I Still Have A Case?
    I received this question the other day, and I thought others might be interested in the answer as well. The short answer is “yes.”  Just because you didn’t immediately go to the doctor does not mean that you were not hurt and that you don’t have a case. But those types of delay do make [...]
  • How Long Will My Personal Injury Case Take?
    This is a common question we hear, and it’s hard to give a great answer because the potential span is so large depending on a number of factors.  For instance, we might resolve some cases within a few months of opening the case, and we might resolve some several years after opening the case.  But [...]
  • I was hit by a drunk driver. Does that affect the value of my case?
    This is a question that I’ve received a few times.  And the answer is, “Being hit by a drunk driver should increase the value of your case, but it doesn’t always.” What do I mean?  Obviously, if the jury knows that you were hit by a drunk driver, they would get mad at the drunk [...]

See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: , , , , , ,



Get headlines from Law Firm Newswire sent right to your inbox.

* indicates required