Six Banks Cheat Veterans on Refinanced Home Loans
Cleveland, OH (Law Firm Newswire) January 9, 2013 - A whistleblower lawsuit will proceed against Wells Fargo and Mortgage Investors Corporation (MIC). It alleges that they illegally charged veterans hidden fees for refinancing home loans.
“This case is as shocking as it is disgusting,” said Christopher Mellino, a Cleveland whistleblower lawyer. “It involves six big name banks that apparently illegally charged vets hidden fees on refinanced home loans from the Veterans Administration (VA). The result of this perfidy is American taxpayers were taken for hundreds of millions of dollars.” The two remaining defendants, Wells Fargo and MIC opted to litigate, while the others settled out of court for a total of $161.7 million.
United States of America ex rel. Victor E. Bibby and Brian J. Donnelly, Defendants, Relators/Plaintiffs vs. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Mortgage Investors Corporation United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-0547-AT should be interesting, as the two remaining banks carry about 70 percent of the damages. “Based on the evidence before the court, it also appears that a jury will have no difficulty understanding the issue, which is they misled veterans and ripped off taxpayers for almost ten years,” added Mellino.
The case is set to move forward and deal with the whistleblower’s claims that Wells Fargo and MIC committed fraud by creating false certifications to the VA, to get those claims paid by the government. Such acts are in direct violation of 31 U.S.C. § 3279(a)(2) of the False Claims Act. It appears that the eight banks involved in this scheme hid illegal fees in veteran’s home mortgage refinancing documents, then submitted claims to the federal government to recoup their fraudulent losses if a loan went into default. “The bottom line here is that any VA-backed loans are void, as illegal fees were charged,” Mellino stated.
The qui tam lawsuit was filed in 2006 by two whistleblowers, Brian Donnelly and Victor Bibby, under the auspices of the federal False Claims Act. The lawsuit is thus brought to court on behalf of the U.S. government, and it will be aimed at recovering damages, ultimately payable to the government. The whistleblowers will be paid a portion of the amount recovered at the end of the day.
“If you find yourself in a similar situation to this case, and are aware of fraud being perpetrated against the federal government, talk to me. We handle whistleblower cases and can advise you of your rights and the process involved,” added Mellino.
Mellino Robenalt LLC
200 Public Sq., Suite 2900
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Call: (216) 241-1901
- What Is the Difference Between a Coma and Brain Death?
When someone suffers traumatic brain injury, coma and brain death are two possible outcomes. Although coma sometimes progresses to brain death, the two injured states are distinct and characterized by very different symptoms. Coma and Vegetative State Coma is a state of deep unconsciousness that lasts for an indeterminate length of time. While in this state, the brain continues to emit electrical impulse signals to the rest of the body, but it is working at the lowest possible level. A vegetative state is a coma from which the patient has recovered brain stem function but not higher cognitive abilities. Such […]
- Study Analyzes Use of Simvastatin and Environmental Enrichment on TBI Patients
A recent study published in the medical journal Brain Injury explored the use of Simvastatin and environmental enrichment on brain injury patients and the outcomes of each treatment. The target group of the study was patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injuries that affected their temporal order memory and spontaneous object recognition. Researchers used male Wistar rats in the study, and compared the therapeutic effects of both Simvastatin and environmental enrichment to see whether they improved memory and recognition and, if so, by how much. Here’s how they conducted the study: The rats arrived at the research facility. Seven […]
- Study Assesses Using Vyvanse to Treat Brain Injured People with ADHD
Attention deficit disorder is one of the most common and debilitating results of traumatic brain injuries. A recent study published in the journal Brain Injury looked at the effectiveness of Vyvanse in terms of treating attention deficit disorder caused by moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries. This is the first study of its kind among traumatic brain injury patients, being unique in that no other study has examined how stimulant medications can affect this disorder, rather than the typical methylphenidate. The study was conducted over 12 weeks and utilized a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind test with cross-over. Twenty-two patients were […]
See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: Cleveland medical malpractice, Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer, Cleveland whistleblower lawyer, Personal Injury Law Cleveland malpractice lawyer