Six Banks Cheat Veterans on Refinanced Home Loans
Cleveland, OH (Law Firm Newswire) January 9, 2013 - A whistleblower lawsuit will proceed against Wells Fargo and Mortgage Investors Corporation (MIC). It alleges that they illegally charged veterans hidden fees for refinancing home loans.
“This case is as shocking as it is disgusting,” said Christopher Mellino, a Cleveland whistleblower lawyer. “It involves six big name banks that apparently illegally charged vets hidden fees on refinanced home loans from the Veterans Administration (VA). The result of this perfidy is American taxpayers were taken for hundreds of millions of dollars.” The two remaining defendants, Wells Fargo and MIC opted to litigate, while the others settled out of court for a total of $161.7 million.
United States of America ex rel. Victor E. Bibby and Brian J. Donnelly, Defendants, Relators/Plaintiffs vs. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Mortgage Investors Corporation United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-0547-AT should be interesting, as the two remaining banks carry about 70 percent of the damages. “Based on the evidence before the court, it also appears that a jury will have no difficulty understanding the issue, which is they misled veterans and ripped off taxpayers for almost ten years,” added Mellino.
The case is set to move forward and deal with the whistleblower’s claims that Wells Fargo and MIC committed fraud by creating false certifications to the VA, to get those claims paid by the government. Such acts are in direct violation of 31 U.S.C. § 3279(a)(2) of the False Claims Act. It appears that the eight banks involved in this scheme hid illegal fees in veteran’s home mortgage refinancing documents, then submitted claims to the federal government to recoup their fraudulent losses if a loan went into default. “The bottom line here is that any VA-backed loans are void, as illegal fees were charged,” Mellino stated.
The qui tam lawsuit was filed in 2006 by two whistleblowers, Brian Donnelly and Victor Bibby, under the auspices of the federal False Claims Act. The lawsuit is thus brought to court on behalf of the U.S. government, and it will be aimed at recovering damages, ultimately payable to the government. The whistleblowers will be paid a portion of the amount recovered at the end of the day.
“If you find yourself in a similar situation to this case, and are aware of fraud being perpetrated against the federal government, talk to me. We handle whistleblower cases and can advise you of your rights and the process involved,” added Mellino.
Mellino Robenalt LLC
200 Public Sq., Suite 2900
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Call: (216) 241-1901
- Common Anesthesia Mistakes: An Overview
Due to the development of better sedation drugs and more sophisticated means of patient monitoring, the mortality rate from anesthesia has dropped significantly since it was first declared a public health problem 50 years ago. Anesthesia mistakes still happen, however, affecting the lives of tens of thousands of patients every year. Lapses in Protocol Anesthesiologists must follow a complex routine each time a patient has a sedation procedure. They need to administer not only the proper drug but also the right amount. Monitoring begins the minute a patient enters the hospital, and the anesthesiologist conducts an interview with the patient […]
- Common Causes of Birth Injuries
The last thing any woman thinks about when she is about to give birth is the possibility that her baby will be injured during the hospital delivery process. Yet injuries occur during at least 2 percent of live births each year in the United States, and they can lead to expensive and sometimes life-threatening conditions, including broken bones, permanent nerve damage, emotional and cognitive impairment, and cerebral palsy. Natural Risk Factors for Birth Injury Some conditions increase an infant’s chances of being injured. They are: A birth weight over 8 pounds, 13 ounces. Premature labor. An unusually shaped uterus. Difficult […]
- What Is the Difference Between a Coma and Brain Death?
When someone suffers traumatic brain injury, coma and brain death are two possible outcomes. Although coma sometimes progresses to brain death, the two injured states are distinct and characterized by very different symptoms. Coma and Vegetative State Coma is a state of deep unconsciousness that lasts for an indeterminate length of time. While in this state, the brain continues to emit electrical impulse signals to the rest of the body, but it is working at the lowest possible level. A vegetative state is a coma from which the patient has recovered brain stem function but not higher cognitive abilities. Such […]
See other news sources publishing this article. BETA | Tags: Cleveland medical malpractice, Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer, Cleveland whistleblower lawyer, Personal Injury Law Cleveland malpractice lawyer